More photos (1 of 2)

Scooting along: A man pushes a chikudu near a refugee camp in the North Kivu province of eastern Congo. (Alex Halperin)

Wood, wheels, workhorse: the chikudu story

In Congo, wooden scooters are mainstays of the local economy, expressions of self-reliance, and, sometimes, the stuff of apprenticeships, too.

By Alex Halperin and Jina Moore / August 29, 2008 edition

Watch Video

Correspondent Jina Moore describes the skill and improvisation needed to make chikudus in Kibumba.


Kibumba, Democratic Republic of Congo

Kibumba, Democratic Republic of Congo

Emanuel Buke won’t train just anyone. Like a swami on a mountaintop, he is discerning about his disciples. For the past 16 years he has chiseled chikudus, two-wheeled wooden scooters unique to this part of eastern Congo. Here farmers use them to haul loads from the foothills of the Virunga Mountains to Goma, the regional hub. In the city’s hectic streets, thousands of chikudus make their way among motorcycles and the white SUVs owned by aid organizations.

Sturdy and effective, if not elegant, the scooters navigate these roads covered with the brittle rocks of solidified lava left from a volcanic eruption six years ago. Boys running errands coast down hills on smaller models, and adult men push chikudus six or seven feet long, weighed down with massive sacks of potatoes, building materials, jugs of water – or all of these at once.

Chikudus are as much a source of local pride as they are a part of the local economy. Formal jobs are rare here, and crafting chikudus is a skilled and prestigious occupation.

So seven years ago, when Samson Nahubusa showed up at Mr. Buke’s door, Buke wasn’t surprised.

He’d seen kids like this before, teenagers looking for work in a part of the world where the best way to feed oneself can be to pick up a gun and join a militia. But Mr. Nahubusa had something the others looking to learn a trade didn’t: a tiny chikudu in his hand. He’d been trying to teach himself by building miniature replicas for years; now, he wanted to work on the real thing. He offered one to Buke as proof he had what it takes.

“Is this right?” he asked.

“No,” Buke said. “You made it wrong…. I have to teach you to do it.”

With that, Nahubusa became Buke’s protégé. For a year, Buke made Nahubusa watch in his tiny workshop, the floor covered in woodchips, attached to his house. Nahubusa waited patiently, until one day, he decided he just couldn’t wait any more.

“Let me try,” he said, and Buke handed him a tool. The work wasn’t perfect, but Buke saw potential.

“He was cleverer than the others,” Buke says now. “To do this work you need to have force and power, but be clever also. He caught on quickly.”

Nahubusa studied under Buke for six years. This year, he opened his own workshop, just down the street from his teacher. His perseverance is less a character trait than a need born of circumstance, he says.

“Local youth don’t have work…. I saw this could help me,” he says. “And it could be important in our village.”

•••

Chikudus are the brainchild of desperate improvisation. Before they overtook the dusty foot paths and rocky roads of eastern Congo, men carried produce to market in wheelbarrows. They traveled only as fast as they could walk, and transported only as much as their arms could lift. The 30 kilometer (18.6 mile) round-trip journey from the fields – near Buke and Nahubusa’s workshops – to Goma and back would take three days. The chikudu cuts that time by two-thirds. Riders load sacks of potatoes six feet high on the footboard and hang jerrycans off the handlebars, which are wide v-shaped pieces of wood. In a single day, it’s possible for a farmer to reach market, get water, and return to sleep in his own bed.

No one is certain when chikudus were invented, or by whom, but locals agree they appeared after independence from colonial Belgium in 1960. By then bicycles and motorcycles had reached Congo, and chikudu makers tried to replicate their functionality.

The scooters are an expression of self-reliance, a sophisticated solution to the small-scale farmer’s needs. The body is made from eucalyptus wood chopped down in the village. The wheels are sculpted from a hard wood locals call mumba, found in the nearby Virunga forest; craftsmen use machetes and makeshift chisels to turn the logs into round wheels. Then they wrap the wheels in tread cut from old tires.

A plank connects the front and back wheels; a shaft, supported by a wooden frame, rises from the front wheel and fits into the handlebars. A tire-tread or abandoned flip-flop nailed to the plank does kneepad duty. The makers brag that the largest chikudus can carry up to 800 kilograms, or 1,760 pounds. Unvarnished and driven hard, they last two or three years.

For all their idiosyncracy, chikudus imitate more modern modes of transport. Most of them, for instance, have shocks made of several springs or, where spare parts are wanting, ribbons of tire treads suspended between the frame and the shaft. They have ball bearings on both wheels, which craftsmen added to compensate for the chikudus’ biggest design flaw: Wooden wheels whirring on wooden axles generated so much friction that they frequently caught fire.

Speed leads to another challenge: stopping. Though some Congolese boys can stop chikudus the way American kids skid to a halt on skateboards or in rollerblades, most drivers need the rear brake, a piece of tire in the back nailed to the footboard, curving above the rear wheel. Stopping a fully loaded chikudu by holding a foot against that small piece of tire requires serious physical power, but it’s safer than the hand brake. Pull that one too fast, and you might fly over the handlebars.

“The hand brake is very bad,” concedes Eugere Bagaruka, who’s been building chikudus since the 1970s. “It could kill someone.”

•••

It’s perhaps evidence of eastern Congo’s isolation that chikudus aren’t more widespread. Buke says he built 35 for people from other provinces last year and one for a Kenyan. He says he even received an order from a Chinese businessman who wanted to see if chikudus could transport luggage.

Yet for all the chikudus’ success, their makers don’t see a path to riches. One chikudu sells for $100, but the building materials cost nearly $60. Bagaruka says chikudus weren’t born out of a hope that anyone would get rich – just a little less poor. “This was created because of the problem we got, to help us make transport,” he says. “We’re farmers. We’re digging. So we think, how can we take some food from these hills to come to the market?”

The risk involved in harvesting mumba for the wheels also eats into the profits. The wood can only be found in a national park, where logging by locals – and rebel groups – has become a problem. Park rangers on patrol arrest mumba harvesters, who pay fines or bribes ranging from $50 to $100 to get out of jail.

And then there’s the risk of just living in eastern Congo, where ongoing conflict has displaced tens of thousands from their homes. This spring, a camp for the newest of the displaced popped up just a few kilometers from Buke and Nahubusa’s workshops.

Still, neither man worries much about war. Nahubusa has a wife and a 9-month-old baby to consider, while Buke has already learned how to rebuild. His home was destroyed when the volcano erupted six years ago. Some of his neighbors fled to and stayed in Rwanda; some moved further north in Congo.

But after a few years, Buke came back. He rebuilt his house and his workshop, and he scrounged the money he needed for his tools. He has a trade, which, in this part of the world, means he’s fortunate.

( More backstory articles )

1. Mary | 08.29.08

I wish there was a better picture of this chikudu. Would like to see the whole thing. Too bad they can’t come up with a satisfactory substitute for the mumba, although I do like very much that these contraptions produce zero emissions. If only the idea were transported to the states and elsewhere, what a difference that would make.

2. skh.pcola | 08.30.08

Yeah, because producing zero emissions is more important than being able to travel 18.6 miles in 20 minutes, leaving the rest of the day available to engage in productive labor or lazy leisure. It is frightening that people like Mary, above, find virtue in wishing that the entire world was as poor as the Congolese. “Zero emissions” is an AlGorian code-phrase for “I’m too stupid to think for myself.”

3. Syd | 08.30.08

Be nice in comments, please. Not everyone understands that zero emissions means world-wide distribution of poverty. The fixed-in-resources people also believe that this earth couldn’t handle everyone’s living as people in the developed parts. They’d like to make those in the developed world poor and keep those in the rest of the world poor.

4. Bill Rudesill | 08.30.08

The interesting element here is innovation and practicality under the circumstances. But inventions can always be improved, and the trick is to hold on to virtues even as our solutions take new forms. These Congolese craftsmen have found a way to add value through their ingenuity and manual skills, without tapping into the petrochemical stream. Might there be lessons for the western world in how to creatively recycle and reuse, to provide needed services more economically? What do we need in order to transform our equivalent of tire strips, natural products, simple tools and mechanical principles into surprisingly useful devices?

5. Amazed | 08.31.08

It is amazing to me that Bill and Mary are so out of touch with the world. Ingenious inventions that improve on the chikudu are cars, trucks, wagons, ox carts, etc…

What we need to transform our equivalent into this type of “high” technology is poverty and subsistence farming. I suggest for you “amazed” people that YOU sell YOUR homes, cars and personal possessions, give away all YOUR clothes and buy yourself an acre of land out in the highland dessert of eastern Oregon. Fill a duffel bag with some knives and other sharp tools, put on a sack cloth and build yourself a hut on this land with your bare hands.

Now attempt to stay alive. You will producing no emissions and using no oil. You will be living sustainably. If you die, you will cease using up the world’s resources, leaving more for another much more worthy individual born in China or India. If you live, you can write a book and become famous.

It continues to amaze me that so many people have forgotten that only a little more than 100 years ago, no one used oil and everyone farmed sustainably. Somehow my great grandmother managed to raise 12 children to adulthood without electricity, a car, petroleum, running water, soccer, gym club membership, and a 3500 sq ft house. I can imagine how few resources she must have used only washing clothes once a week on top of a wood stove in a washtub with soap made from fat and wood ash. No packaging waste there as most of all the food came from her garden and was cooked on that same stove everyday. The “packaging” that the flour and sugar came in was used for clothes, towels and bedding. Also remember these 12 living children represented at least 24 years of constant pregnancy.

The children produced in this “poverty” all grew up to be productive, law abiding citizens. They were bi-lingual in French and english and all were taught to play piano. One became an Oregon state senator.

The biggest problem in our American society of consumerism is the need to improve our social power with our “packaging”. Picture yourself in a flour sack washed once a week at a cocktail party or rock climbing with your friends. Because most of us have no marketable production skills other than using our social (service industries), we must consume and waste to mask our inability to produce anything of value to have any personal power over others. If we all were in dirty flour sacks, only the truely interesting and useful people would have any social power.

Note one of the reasons the young man gives for his apprenticeship. He wants to be important/socially acceptable in his village. In other words, he wants to develop a skill that is important to others to improve his social standing in the community.

6. jake | 08.31.08

I believe I read somewhere that the calories you need to do manual labor transportation such as this requires crow growth and respiration causing greater greenhouse gasses than if you simply used a gasoline vehicle.

7. jake | 08.31.08

make that crop growth.

8. Keith | 08.31.08

Jake, that’s not the case. If you were pushing around a one ton vehicle, the total work (and energy consumed, and greenhouse gases created) might be about the same, but for example, riding a bicycle while carrying a basket of food is a lot more efficient than putting it in the car. One reason is you’re not lugging the extra weight of the car around, the other is that there is a lesser drag force (wind friction) on the bicyclist.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.