Return trip: G5, a wayward bull elephant, was sedated and all 14,000 pounds of him lifted by crane onto a flatbed to return to Gorongosa National Park. The leaves would be used to cool him on the trip. (Stephanie Hanes)

The saga of a runaway elephant bull

It was a harrowing scramble to save man and beast when G5, a seven-ton elephant bull, escaped a Mozambique national park.

By Stephanie Hanes | Correspondent / November 20, 2008 edition

Watch Video

Wildlife officials try to save G5, a bull elephant that escaped Mozambique's Gorongosa National Park.


Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique

Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique

The elephant arrived in September with an entourage. There were veterinarians, rangers, transport trucks, and even a film crew to document the historical moment – the reintroduction of big tuskers to what was once the most animal-rich spot in Africa, Mozambique’s Gorongosa National Park.

After his 700-mile truck journey from South Africa, which had donated the animal and five others, the elephant was immobilized and fitted with a satellite collar by Gorongosa’s head of conservation, Carlos Lopes Pereira. The collar’s frequency, and hence the bull’s name, was G5.

Soon, G5 was hoisting his seven tons back onto his massive feet and walking into the bush.
G5 mingled with Gorongosa’s small herd of tuskless elephants for a few days, grazing his way through the palm and thorn trees.

But two weeks later, something happened. Maybe he was distressed by the fires – set by poachers – that swept through part of the park after he arrived. Or maybe an ornery matriarch chased him away. When Mr. Pereira checked G5’s satellite feed, he realized the bull was gone – he’d left the park, and seemed to be heading back to South Africa, a route filled with roads, railway lines, and tens of thousands of people. His life, and those of villagers in his path, were in danger.

“This,” Pereira said, “could be a disaster.”

• • •

In the 1960s, this park was a top tourist destination. Astronauts and movie stars vacationed here; the park boasted more lions than any other reserve of its size. There were thousands of elephants with massive tusks that measured as much as 8 feet and weighing 100 pounds. But not long after Mozambique won independence from Portugal in 1975, it fell into civil war. Gorongosa was at the center of the conflict, and soldiers from both sides slaughtered the animals for food and ivory.

About 300 elephants remain, almost all tuskless – a sort of natural selection by poaching. (In a normal population, 7 percent have no tusks.) Wildlife experts say the tuskless elephants can be more aggressive than their tusked counterparts. So when the South African park system offered to donate big-tusked elephants, Pereira saw it as an opportunity to diversify the local gene pool.

G5 was just what he wanted: More than 40 years old, 10-1/2 feet tall at his shoulders, ankles three feet around. The visible part of G5’s tusks measured four feet. (The part under the skin almost doubles the length.) And he was unarguably mellow – contentedly munching on thorn trees as tourists snapped photos. Young elephants learn behavior from their elders. So, park officials thought, G5 might calm resident herds.

But now, instead of symbolizing the resurgence of Gorongosa, G5 represented one of the toughest questions in conservation today: whether it is possible to manage the relationship between wild animals and the people who live in their traditional habitats, or whether animals will only survive if kept in fenced, closed parks.

• • •

Pereira held the satellite antenna by the open helicopter door the day after he realized G5 was missing, hoping to get a signal from the elephant’s collar. Beneath him, green palms dotted scorched, black earth.

Though warned not to, many people illegally clear brush in the park by fire, which helps poachers steer clear of lions and herd other animals into snares. These fires also burn the elephants’ food. Though villagers often complain about elephants leaving the unfenced park and eating their crops, there is a clear correlation between park fires and elephant movement.

“What do you expect the elephants to do? They need to eat,” explained Pereira.

For a newbie like G5, he said, fires can be terrifying. So as Pereira flew farther and farther away from the park’s boundaries, he was increasingly nervous. Elephants can cover up to 50 miles in a day if they’re really moving.

After 45 minutes in the air, Pereira returned to Gorongosa to wait for the next daily GPS transmission from G5’s collar. The next morning, he learned that G5 was making his way through small vegetable fields near Nhamatanda, a two-hour drive from the park. And the park director of human development, Mateus Mutemba, started getting calls from the irate Nhamatanda police chief. “He is very upset. He says that he is going to shoot it, that it is a threat,” Mr. Mutemba said.

Elephants are generally gentle creatures, but if threatened, they can easily crush a human.
The park contacted higher-level police officials who ordered the chief to hold his fire.

Meanwhile, the animal had now crossed a main road and railway line and was lingering at a Nhamatanda cattle farm. Pereira sent his best rangers there to form a barrier around the elephant. For three days, they kept villagers away, and kept the elephant from moving on.

But Pereira knew he had little time. So he called two of his associates in the animal translocation field – Kester Vickery of South Africa’s Specialist Game Services and pilot Barney O’Hara. The two have transported everything from rhinos to buffaloes to whole elephant herds all across southern Africa. By that weekend – seven days since G5 escaped – the two were at Gorongosa Park, and Mr. Vickery had sent one of his large animal relocation trucks north from the Mozambican capital of Maputo, 700 miles from Nhamatanda.

Usually, they’d have more equipment to move an elephant. But they couldn’t afford to wait. As it was, there had been problems. At first, police in Maputo stopped Vickery’s truck until others in the government finally persuaded the officers to let it go. Then the driver found four punctured tires. Eventually it arrived, and the wildlife experts made a plan to transport G5.

• • •

Midmorning of the 10th day of G5’s wandering, Pereira sat in the back seat of O’Hara’s helicopter with his dart gun ready. As the helicopter dipped toward the treeline, he had a clear shot and fired a powerful anesthetic into G5’s body.

The chopper landed near the staggering elephant, and Vickery moved the flatbed truck in. The rest of the team tied the elephant to the truck’s massive crane, lifting the animal onto the flatbed. The rangers poured water on his skin, fanned him, and made sure his trunk did not get blocked. They chopped down bushes to cover him and keep him cool for the four-hour drive.

Villagers cheered as the elephant lashed to the flatbed rolled through Nhamatanda.
“We have been very, very scared,” said Nhamatanda resident Antonio Olvera. “We would see the footprints in the morning – we didn’t sleep.”

The rangers waved to the villagers, and everyone seemed joyous.
But about an hour north, Vickery noticed that G5 was struggling to breathe. He flagged the truck to stop, and rushed to treat the animal. But within moments, the elephant had stopped breathing.

A ranger tried to pour water on G5, but then stood still, realizing the futility. The rangers looked at the body quietly, and the other park employees stood silently on the asphalt as if stunned. One put his hand to his heart.

“Now,” said Pereira, jaw clenched, “you are watching a funeral.”

• • •

Lights blinking, the vehicles drove slowly back to the park, and then along dirt road deep into the bush. Rangers started the grim task of removing the bull’s tusks – necessary to prevent ivory seekers from coming into the park. A bulldozer dug a deep hole to bury G5 – because of the anesthetic his meat was dangerous for animals or people who might eat it.
Pereira, Vickery, and O’Hara sat in the shade, quiet. “If you move a hundred elephants, you maybe lose one,” Vickery said. “We knew the risks … our only alternative was to shoot it.”

As it was, they had demonstrated to the villagers that the park would do everything it could to protect people and animals, said Mutemba. “The people saw that we were willing to make an investment in removing the elephant…. It’s just very sad that he didn’t make it.”

When G5 was finally covered with earth, rangers lined up by the grave, and with an old, barely working rifle, fired two shots into the air.

( More backstory articles )

1. Don Griffith | 11.20.08

Life is God, and Life never ends; consequently, all of Life’s creatures (spiritual ideas) can never end, either. That man will struggle to preserve life–even material life–is a sign that those who care will go the extra mile in order to aid one of Life’s creatures. This is a proof of God’s care through man as God’s reflection. And, it is very good.

2. Amy | 11.20.08

Thank you for this heart-breaking story. (Also for the moving video of the rangers’ last tribute to G5.) It is emblematic of the larger struggle to find ways for humans and other animals to coexist. Right now the animals are losing, but that means in the end we will all lose.

3. williaesfriend | 11.20.08

oh for gosh sake it’s an animal, we kill millions of babies every year and no one blinks.

4. boredwell | 11.20.08

The poor guy. Fires, poachers,tuskless neighbors, homesick ofr South Africa. G5’s transplantation to Mozambique, a once devastated, still struggling country, illustrates the desire to restore the balance lost in their national parks.

G5’s death is culmination of too-much tranquillizer as evidenced by this shallow breathing and the weight of his massive body compressing his lungs. The trauma of capture, especially in highly intelligent and sensitve animals like elephants endangers their survial in new, foreign habitat. The physio-bio-socio ramifications of relocation-to the herd, human poplulation and the environment-needs to be reexamined in order to better serve the needs of parties involved.

5. S. Sandlin | 11.20.08

Were that animal conservation stories such as this were considered by our tv media important enough to educate the public what was happening around the world. Surely it’s as important as the newest clothes worn by politicians and the latest lament about some film star!

6. Olivia | 11.21.08

I know Don (#1) is stating divine truth (absolute reality) and Amy (#2) is right from a human standpoint, but I momentarily set aside everything I know to have a good cry. The last time I cried over an elephant was a year ago when a friend who is ignorant of the grandeur and glory of wild elephants sent me a Christmas card in which she described eating several kinds of unusual meat, including elephant, while on a trip to Africa. Upon reading that, I totally lost it. May we all learn to love and respect these noble creatures of God, and give them the space and peace they so richly deserve and require.

7. doris | 11.21.08

that was bad,the must have enougth security

8. Richard Estes | 11.21.08

I question whether the anesthetic made the whole carcass inedible or dangerous. If the area around the injection spot was removed, tons of meat would have been a great bonanza to the locals. Waste not, want not.

9. tracey pettersen | 11.21.08

how sad to have one of Gods most wise creatures have it’s life end so haphazardly at the hands of man

10. Dave Myers | 11.21.08

The big picture …

11. Pithy Opiner | 11.21.08

The project was doomed from the start. You can’t move a 14,000 lb animal in a state of “rest”. This animal did not sleep laying down. The massive weight would have hampered his breathing ability. For that reason, he would have slept standning up. Putting him on the truck in a state of rest was the kiss of death for him. How could those experts not know this. It would have been more productive to walk him back to the park even it would have taken a month to do it. By placing food in front of him you could have got him to walk back on his own. I’m amazed he knew the direction to go to get back home. How could he know this?

12. Kim Woodbridge | 11.30.08

This broke my heart - the video was so sad to watch. I’m sure he must have died from the tranquilizers. I agree with Pithy - they should have tried to find another way to get the animal back to the park.

13. Tim Serras | 12.15.08

Gorongosa is being run by imcompetent, corrupt and egocentrist indivuduals. The whole project is a reflection of the Mozambican tourism industry. Great potential but bad management. It´s like letting a formula one racing car in the hands of a kid who only knows how to drive the playstation. Pathetic!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.