Blotter fodder: Isaac Cornetti poses with a copy of his crime paper, ‘The Slammer.’ He goes by the nom de plume ’Dash Dangerfield’ on the masthead. (Ashley Lorenz/Courtesy of Isaac W. Cornetti)
A crime paper flourishes by printing mug shots
Isaac Cornetti, aka ‘Dash Dangerfield,’ finds an audience for ‘The Slammer’ in North Carolina – a publication that some think provides a public service but others call an unethical crime rag.
By Patrik Jonsson | Staff writer / January 6, 2009 edition
Raleigh, N.C.
Looking like a “Goodfellas”-era Ray Liotta, Isaac Cornetti strolls into the Raleigh Times restaurant here in a faded corduroy jacket. He’s carrying a stack of his famous – and infamous – tabloid newspaper, The Slammer.
Patrons grab copies. Some chuckle, some hunch over newsprint, and some simply gawk as they scan rows upon rows of mug shots and rap sheets in a frenzy that would spark envy in the hearts of newspaper publishers nationwide.
If “Jerry Springer” came in newsprint, The Slammer could be it – a garish compilation of the week’s local crimes and their alleged perpetrators. The men and women, with their dour mugs, bloodied noses, and booze-induced grins, have been arrested for everything from skipping a court date to robbing a food mart. It is, in essence, the local police blotter writ large.
To devoted readers, The Slammer and similar publications – like Cellmates in Florida’s Tampa Bay area and Jail in Orlando – perform a valuable public service, putting the gritty side of life on display and even protecting the community from predatory criminals.
“It really lets you know what’s going on around you,” says Omar Williams, a Raleigh bail bondsman who advertises every week in The Slammer and – no surprise – reaches a lot of clients through its pages. “You could see your best friend in there for forging checks or selling cocaine, and he’s driving around in the car with you, and you don’t know this stuff.”
Critics, on the other hand, see the papers as sensational, tawdry, and ethically dubious – a modern form of the “crime rags” that flourished in the heyday of early 20th-century yellow journalism. “This is a sad commentary on the state of American journalism,” says Bob Steele, a journalism ethics expert at the Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Fla. “It’s really painful to know that so many publications are struggling terribly and something as schlocky as this is succeeding.”
And succeeding it is. At a time when dozens of US newspapers are searching for buyers and for cash, The Slammer’s newsstand profit margin is four times that of most local dailies, and its circulation has grown to 29,000 – up nearly 50 percent from 20,000 just last year. At more than 500 convenience stores across North Carolina, it’s selling at a buck a pop.
In fact, the chief complaints the weekly paper gets come from perps complaining that their photos didn’t get printed. In February, the paper will expand its operations from three major North Carolina counties – including the cities of Charlotte, Raleigh, and Durham – to add Columbus, Ohio.
•••
Mr. Cornetti – “Dash Dangerfield” on the masthead – is a 30-something publisher with a thick shock of hair and a Philip Marlowe fascination with America’s “simmering undercurrent of low-level crime.” To him, The Slammer offers entertainment and, yes, social value as well, tracing the thin line many Americans tread between upstanding behavior and the occasional lapse into lawlessness.
“You look at this paper, and you’re amazed by the amount of illegal stuff going on in what you thought was a sleepy little city,” he says, referring to Raleigh. “The appeal is voyeurism and schadenfreude, and it has some redeeming qualities, too, like helping people protect themselves, their families, and their businesses.”
Cornetti, the son of a well-to-do Smithfield, N.C., family, spent a lot of time in courtrooms as a kid: His mother worked at the courthouse, and during Cornetti’s middle-school summers, he spent days watching lawyers and judges, then went home to watch “Law and Order,” “Perry Mason,” and “Matlock.”
In his late teens and early 20s, he ran afoul of the law himself, and spent a year serving time for drug and larceny charges involving marijuana and a stolen TV. After that, he says, he grew interested in practicing law, and took the LSAT in 2004 in hopes of becoming a criminal attorney.
Instead, he took a series of entrepreneurial jobs in sales and software, then read about Jail (the Orlando-based publication) on a business trip and was inspired. He hopes The Slammer can become “the kind of wake-up call that I wish I’d had when I was younger.”
To some extent, that may be happening: Some readers claim they’ve thought twice about drinking and driving, for fear of ending up in The Slammer. And Slammer readers have helped Charlotte police locate several felons with major warrants, Cornetti says.
Even when arrests turn out not to be justified, Cornetti insists, The Slammer can do some good. A Charlotte lawyer who is in the process of trying to settle a case with the police department for what he says was a wrongful arrest recently contacted him. The client had appeared in The Slammer.
“Obviously we won’t run a correction,” says Cornetti of cases like these. “But we’d be happy to tell a client’s story…. If people are being arrested unlawfully, The Slammer is going to be a barometer for that.”
A die-hard reader of the Sunday New York Times, Cornetti is modest in his assessment of his own publication, which is produced by a staff of 12. “I don’t think [The Slammer] deserves the ‘journalism’ title,” he says. “But we do try to present research and we hope that when [readers are] finished with the newspapers, they’ve learned something.”
•••
More colorful and more professionally produced than its counterparts, The Slammer’s eclectic spread includes features such as the “Slammer Salon” of crazy arrest-night hairdos; a “mug shot extravanganza [sic]” of the bleary-eyed; the “Kiddie Korner” of busted young adults; and “Mature Menaces,” featuring senior alleged larcenists and check forgers. A Wendell, N.C., woman was singled out for repeated driving violations, becoming a recent edition’s “featured impaired driver.”
“Oh, Monique,” the text goes, “Aren’t you feeling weak? So upset you can hardly speak? Knightdale Police done punched your card. Now from walking you’ll be ‘tard’ [tired]. Left-right-left-right.”
Shakespeare it’s not. But to fans of such tabloids, like St. Petersburg, Fla., resident Courtney Doerr, a regular reader of Cellmates, they’re “street poetry.” And The Slammer runs more sober pieces, too: A recent editorial came down against the death penalty.
Even some police officials see little difference between the role of The Slammer and those of more prestigious media outlets. These modern crime rags “may well be reaching some readers that the daily circulation papers don’t on a regular basis,” says Jim Sughrue, a spokesman for the Raleigh Police Department. “I would say there’s a value to these publications.”
But critics say ridiculing people who remain innocent in the eyes of the Constitution is the definition of unethical. “They’re basically creating a miniature billboard in which these individuals are named and visually identified, often pejoratively, in a way that does not give them a fair hearing,” says Mr. Steele at Poynter.
Indeed, Mike Hoyt, editor of the Columbia Journalism Review in New York, calls the publications barely a “step up from the stocks.”
But Randall Brown has a different take. An avid reader of Cellmates, Mr. Brown is also a regular feature: He claims he’s been in Cellmates 10 times, all for misdemeanor alcohol violations, and he doesn’t mind the publicity. In his view, all of us are just a banana peel-slip away from arrest. “Everybody makes mistakes – the Bible says so,” he says. “People love to gossip.”
That love of gossip and the longing to know – drives older than newsprint itself – may be Cornetti’s most reliable sales force. Philip Isley, a lawyer and Raleigh city councilor, likens The Slammer to “our own little ‘Entertainment Tonight’ weekly.”
“Clearly, there’s a morbid desire for people to know exactly what’s going on criminally in the community,” he says, suggesting that awareness “can have a great deterrent effect, notwithstanding the thrillseekers who enjoy seeing their mug shot in print.”
Back at the Raleigh Times restaurant, where Cornetti is a minor celebrity, one group of barstool readers is trying to determine if a friend’s boyfriend, who supposedly got arrested recently, is in the paper. Cornetti gets up for a few minutes and returns to the table. He nods back toward the server, who had eagerly grabbed The Slammer when he came in. “She just told me she was in it in May,” he says.
Apparently, she harbored no hard feelings.
2. debartolo | 01.06.09
nothing new here….ben thomas started a st louis crime sheet, complete with rap journalism, in the 1930s…
3. Rick Kenney | 01.06.09
Bob Steele is, of course, correct about the schlock and sleaze factor. But it’s not just specialized publications that are doing this. The Orlando Sentinel, for example, features “Mug Shots” on its home page and links to more:
http://www.orlandosentinel2.com/data/arrests/
Despite the disclaimer that those pictured are innocent until proved guilty, it’s still pathetic pandering to the basest tastes. Then again, the Sentinel also chose to feature a picture and story about a chihuahua on its Web site for months. More and more, it seems, this kind of project is being pushed and published by people with little or no connection to journalism and the best of its traditional values. It’s beyond a shame, but then those selling this schlock know no shame.
4. John Telford | 01.06.09
Sorry, but I couldn’t agree less with the “expert” Mr. Steele.
It’s called supply and demand, Mr. Steele. These publications make no grandiose claims or pretend to be something they aren’t. They obviously strike a chord with readers because the papers offer them something they can’t get anywhere else.
Having worked in the newspaper industry for 17 years, I know a little bit about the inner workings of “serious” journalism, and the newspaper industry has no one to blame for the current climate it finds itself other than, well, the newspaper industry.
Newspapers are full of people who have noble ideas about serving the public good, an admirable thing to be sure. The problem is no one asks whether or not the public is interested.
I’m not suggesting traditional newspapers should completely stop delivering “serious” journalism, but clearly there’s an interest among readers for content available in publications like The Slammer (when was the last time a traditional newspaper saw a 50% circulation jump?).
No disrespect to Mr. Steele, but perhaps he should come down from his ivory tower once in a while and actually ask what people are interested in reading.
5. Medival Pranger | 01.06.09
This is stupid, pathetic and - most of all - sad. It shows the demise of a society which censors rather harmless words in order to “protect” the youth and at the same time feeds minor offenders to voyeurs and tabloids.
Just imagine the mug shot of your son or daughter appears in this filth because they participated on a protest rally, smoked a joint, drank a beer in the park or even where mistakenly arrested.
You could pay me $5000 every month for the rest of my life just for coming to live in the USA, I would prefer to stay in my country and work for little money and keep my civil rights, my privacy and dignity instead.
Medieval Pranger, Belgium
7. timmay | 01.07.09
great story! but i didn’t see any links to websites for any of the mags? are there any? Im in Connecticut and would love to take a look at it. thanks for any help.
8. AG | 01.07.09
5 police cars, lights and sirens blazing, speed by me at night while I was walking downtown. Nothing in the local papers or the internet about what was happening.
I saw police arrest somebody inside a bank. Again nothing on the internet or local papers.
I’m more likely to read a story about homelessness in Nepal then I am about somebody I may know in my own neighborhood. Such is the state of our media industry.
9. Dapper | 01.07.09
Okay, I do like the story, but COME ON!! There is NO WAY that guy was watching Matlock, Perry Mason AND Law and Order when he was a kid. I know L&O’s been on a long time now, but…Perry Mason? Come on…
10. Tina Trent | 01.07.09
Poynter Institute “journalism ethics expert” Bob Steele may think crime rags are a “sad commentary on the state of American journalism,” but more disturbing, I think, is the pro-criminal bias in crime reporting at the newspaper attached to the Poynter Institute and other prestige dailies. The St. Petersburg Times routinely runs articles that express sympathy for vicious offenders while downplaying or ignoring the impact of their crimes on victims and the community. Today, an article titled “Once a Symbol of Juvenile Crime, Man is Unable to Shake Trouble,” empathetically minimizes the scores of crimes committed by JJ Revear. Revear’s known crimes include armed robberies (in other words, potential murders), multiple auto thefts, and burglary at the home of a women who has recently been robbed of her van and power wheelchair. No words are wasted exploring the experience of the apparently wheelchair-bound victim, who has now been robbed twice in one month, but Revear is described, at florid length, as a passive victim of circumstance, trapped by “mistakes,” unable to “shake trouble” or “escape” from “a cycle of arrests.” He is described as “diminutive” and a public defender calls him “one of her nicest clients.” His many victims are not consulted for their views of the man (and one might be forgiven for wondering what this lawyer’s less “nice” clients could possibly have done, if it is more predatory than armed robbery and victimizing defenseless women).
At least the crime rags don’t pretend to be objective.
11. Andrew Nicholas Roman | 01.09.09
Doesn’t anybody remember a blotter in their regular daily paper?
For whatever reason, this piece of journalism has all but disappeared from most rags. Honestly, it’s a tragedy considering half of the people that purchased the last newspaper that I worked for only did so to read obituaries.
There IS a demand to know what’s going on after dark and any editor that doesn’t recognize that a blotter will help move papers needs to take a note. Besides, all the blotter information is public record and can be retrieved by anyone walking into a police station — so provide a service and give it to your readers!
Especially considering that even the most traditional of papers are switching to a more “tabloid” format — entry points and photographs out the wazoo — in order to try and boost sales.
A perfect example: My old hometown paper in Pennsylvania who still runs a weekly blotter. My mom will call me on average once a month and ask, “Do you know” such and such. My first response: “Did they die or get arrested?” It’s a 50/50 shot because I know those are the first sections she reads.
Great work and keep it coming!
12. Zilyance | 01.12.09
Ok people, look…If you do not like the paper, do not read it! If you do not want to be in the paper do not get arrested! It is as simple as that! Do not down that young man for making his money and if you all would have thought of doing the same thing, I’m sure it would not be a problem for you either. So just chill and do not get arrested! Toodles!
14. John A. | 03.20.09
There is another company that does this to and they even send you a letter in the mail that says “your arrest picture is now online at nccriminalreports.com where anyone can view it. we’re sorry, but we hope everything is ok.” Ask me how I know… ![]()
15. Ellis McKensie | 05.13.09
I’d probably feel more sleazy about this kind of thing if so many people (mostly young) who end up getting arrested didn’t seem to be HAVING FUN at the jailhouse. There’s a thing called muggn that strips things down even more. No names, no crimes … just mugshots that end up being funny. That sure ain’t journalism, but in a society where nobody watches The Nightly News and everybody watches American Idol, it seems about right.
16. Giovanna L. | 06.16.09
Wake Up People!
This is clearly against our own constitutional rights. Posting your mug shot is illegal if you’re not “convicted” of any crime! Your privacy rights are clearly in violation. We due have the right to see “public information” those who has been convicted of these crimes. KEY WORD ” Convicted”.
Threat to democracy in the 21st Century, is the Monopoly of the Media!
Read a book “The Media Monopoly”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.


1. Dave | 01.06.09
We’ve already got a rag like this in Charlotte… don’t need another, thanks.