The Christian Science Monitor
Books

What the Chinese must not forget

Mao may be gone but a legacy of repression lives on.

By Lori Valigra | July 10, 2008 edition

Out of Mao's Shadow: The Struggle for the Soul of a New China By Philip P. Pan Simon & Schuster 349 pp. $28

Lin Zhao, 36, was an imprisoned poetess who cut her flesh and wrote hundreds of pages in her own blood before being executed in 1968 for repeatedly criticizing the Communist Party. But the same passionate and charismatic Lin Zhao also was a fervent follower of Mao Zedong in the early days of the party.

Sent to the countryside during the land-reform movement that resulted in the violent deaths of more than 2 million landlords and their families by 1952, Lin Zhao once placed a landlord in a vat of freezing water overnight, later telling her comrades that his screams made her feel “cruel happiness.”

A decade later, she had turned against the party. During a prison visit two years before her death, she handed a close friend a tiny sailboat folded out of a cellophane candy wrapper and asked him to “tell people in the future about all this suffering.”

Such is the enigma lying just beneath the surface for the millions of Chinese who suffered before and during the Cultural Revolution (which lasted from about 1966 to 1976). By government estimates, about 36 million people were killed and as many permanently injured at that time.

In Out of Mao’s Shadow: The Struggle for the Soul of a New China, journalist Philip P. Pan gets almost unprecedented access to Lin Zhao’s friends and other ordinary Chinese people still struggling to understand their past even as they forge ahead into a future of rapid transition.

Pan’s book is a dark, sober, but highly important look at the struggle against repression in China. Today, more than half of the Chinese population was born after the Cultural Revolution ended, so they have come of age with only a vague understanding of the scale of the violence endured by their parents and grandparents. Pan’s interviews help to document some of their stories.

But he also talks to Chinese involved in contemporary struggles against their government. His interviewees are often simple people, but their stories are complex. They include an elderly surgeon who exposes the government’s coverup of the SARS epidemic, a teaching instructor and former Red Guard member who is trying to identify the bodies in what may be China’s only cemetery dedicated to victims of the Cultural Revolution, and a blind man jailed for his fight against forced abortions under China’s one-child policy.

Pan, who is fluent in Chinese, was bureau chief for The Washington Post in Beijing. His stories depict people who are not docile about individual rights, although many have been crushed by government resistance.
Often, Pan’s subjects were initially hesitant to talk to him. Some eventually let details of the past gush out. Others remained unwilling to look back and instead seek happiness in the future. The party has succeeded in part, Pan asserts, because Chinese people have been willing to forget.

What Pan found in his years of travel across China was a country whose Communist leaders retained their political grip and power amid its economic revolution. And while he says the country’s past 25 years have been the best in its 5,000-year history, the Chinese people still have not escaped the shadow of Mao, who died in 1976. A momentous struggle is under way for the soul of the world’s most populous nation, Pan asserts. His book, he says, is an effort to describe the battle for China’s future through the eyes of the handful of men and women he interviewed.

“Out of Mao’s Shadow” ends somewhat wistfully, with Pan recounting his final conversation with Chen Guangcheng, the blind man who took on the government’s one-child policy. Pan tells Chen that he studied Chinese in Beijing in the early 1990s and that he naively thought at that time that the Communist Party’s fall from power was imminent. He was even reluctant to leave the country when his studies were completed, he says. because he didn’t want to miss that historic moment. Today, however, Pan tells Chen, he has come to believe that the party could continue to hold on for quite a while. “I hope [the government’s fall] happens in our lifetime,” Chen responds. “He said it almost cheerfully, without a hint of sadness,” Pan writes.

Shortly afterward, Chen was arrested.

Lori Valigra, a journalist based in Cambridge, Mass., worked and traveled extensively in Asia for five years.

Comments

1. Coinach | 07.11.08

I am a 77 year old Australian, I agree with the writer, China will be FREE from communism, I am sure there are more Chinese people who WANT this, than there are who wish to live under the comunnist s—e.

2. solveyn | 07.13.08

I’m a chinese.But as most chinese’opinion , I donnot think the goverment of communism should fall .Do not judge what we think by what you think.We know that there are such problems in my country.But just like an American said :where is freedom ,where is my country.well,i want to say that this is my country ,and i will make it be of freedom.

3. David Dresser | 07.15.08

I am American, nearly 72, old enough to have lived through strange times of fear. It is clear to me that laissez-faire capitalism is often more oppressive than any of the variants of communism. Communism is more often just a bogeyman best for scaring children. The Chinese are engaged in more capitalism at this time than orthodox communism. That may lead to collapse of the nation.

4. Drs. William K. Gelok | 07.15.08

Cruel China, were no human rights exist. A shame that Olympics are there to be hold. This country will be a serious threat to the free world in the future.And theres no freedom for Christanity there!

5. Tim | 07.15.08

Only very old people would be fooled by these 60′-70’s stories.

6. Judy Roach | 07.16.08

I teach at a university in China. I work with students whose knowledge of the Cultural Revolution has been whitewashed and is merely a dust mote for them. Some know nothing about Tienanmen Square or know it to be merely a misguided student demonstration. The educational system is dictated from Beijing. It is a system of rote memorization; they are bewildered by critical thinking. Our concepts of individuality and privacy are entirely foreign to them. The economic opportunities distract absolutely from the political realities, as we understand them. The problem is infinitely more complex than overthrowing communism which, after all, is another dynasty by any other name. Judy Roach

7. الف | 07.23.08

thank you how are you todey

8. Wayne Wang | 08.29.08

thank you, Judy Roach.
i’m a university student at present.
in my view, indeed, much of those discussed above are not even critical to me, so here according to you, i feel somewhat a little favored that i could be what i am today, but the fact is that, frequently i feel upset and lonely for what i am today.
In other words, it takes a person some effort and costs to be a critical person.
or it can be said in other way, most students maybe are wiser than me for choosing to avoid all of these and live simplely.

9. Wayne Wang | 08.29.08

forget to mention, i am chinese.
谁才有真正的资格去谈论这世界的是是非非呢?这是个问题。

10. Wayne Wang | 08.29.08

forgot to mention , i’m Chinese.

and sth to add as a “?”
we have the right to talk all rights and wrongs, yes, but are we really qualified?

11. christina | 09.13.08

i`m a chinese and i love china, i don`t think our nation will collapse . on the contrary china is becoming stronger and stronger. maybe there are some problems in china, but that`s the showing of growing of china. and i know many west coutries are afraid of china`s growing and they are trying to control this, but i`ll say that nothing can stop china to be the greatest country in the world

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate – even pointed disagreement – is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.