Giordano Bruno: Philosopher/Heretic

Giordano Bruno was a philosopher before his time.

By M.M. Bennetts  |  August 22, 2008 edition

Giordano Bruno: Philosopher/Heretic By Ingrid D. Rowland Farrar, Straus and Giroux 400 pp. $27

During the 15th and 16th centuries, Europe underwent an information revolution unprecedented in the history of mankind.

The invention of the compass, the printing press, and the telescope, the translation of the Bible into the vernacular, the rediscovery of classical Greek philosophy, and the discoveries of the New World, gunpowder, and that the Earth was not the center of the universe – all instigated radical shifts in the thinking that had dominated the mental landscape for centuries.

Occasionally the shifts were seen as good things. More frequently, they were fiercely resisted by church and state authorities. Moreover, the great thinkers, writers, pioneers, and scientists of the age – Leonardo da Vinci, Erasmus, Galileo, Luther, and Tycho Brahe to name a few – were often persisting in their work in the face of unparalleled persecution.

Giordano Bruno: Philosopher/Heretic is Ingrid Rowland’s portrait of a lesser known, though no less daring, Italian, whose religious, philosophical, and scientific quests helped to usher in the modern age of science and mathematics.

Shaped by the priesthood
Filippo Bruno was born in Nola, in southern Italy, in 1548. He was the precocious only child of a mercenary soldier. At 17 he was sent to the convent of San Domenico Maggiore in Naples to train for the priesthood. There, in the rigorous academic atmosphere that was Renaissance Naples, he studied and learned to emulate or argue with the writings of Aristotle and Plato, as well as those of Thomas Aquinas, Marsilio Ficino, and Giles of Viterbo.

He took his vows as a friar of the order in 1566, and assumed the name Giordano. Although he would spend the next 10 years of his life pursuing his studies, including developing his own method of memorization, eventually the reactionary crackdowns of the Inquisition would force him into the life of a peripatetic scholar and teacher.

His travels took him from Switzerland to Paris to England to Germany to Prague and back to Italy. But wherever he went, an irascible nature and fiery intellectual pride drove him into conflict with local academics, whom he bitterly reviled and caricatured.

Profuse thinker, writer
Yet throughout his life, he wrote and published copiously: poetry, plays, books on the art of memory, philosophical tracts, and essays expounding his evolving theories of infinity. His attempts to find an adequate means to measure and calculate both the infinite and the infinitesimal led directly to his formulation of atomic theory.

Unsurprisingly, his theories were far too expansive and threatening to the dogmatic religious authorities of his day. Thus, after nearly a decade in prison, first in Venice and then in Rome, he was condemned as a heretic by the Inquisition in 1600 and suffered a heretic’s fate: burned at the stake.

Still, Ms. Rowland’s “Giordano Bruno: Philosopher/Heretic” is less a biography of the man than a largely uncritical examination of his vast literary and philosophical output, with the few facts of his life offered as source material or a mere framework for the discussion of his writings.

The early chapters are a testament to the risks of speaking out or thinking originally in a society ruled by a repressive regime.

Because of the lack of factual information, the author frequently substitutes conjecture and inference such as “[he] must have read” or “must have known” or “must have met” for factual evidence.

Further, Rowland assumes a specialist’s knowledge of Renaissance politics, religion, and philosophy which may leave one wanting for the nonexistent Cliff Notes on philosophers and significant figures of the Counter-Reformation in Rome and Naples.

And as Bruno wrote copiously, so does Rowland quote copiously – page upon 8-point-type page of it, much of it imponderably obscure. Only rarely does she attempt to convey the color, vigor, and clamor of life in a Renaissance city.

Frequently tangled in the web of her own scholarship and Bruno’s sophistry, she seems unable to distinguish between Bruno’s flights of insightful genius, which, as in the works of many Renaissance authors, lie cheek by jowl with ideas we now find arcane or hopelessly naive.

For the sake of knowledge
But “Giordano Bruno: Philosopher/Heretic” is not without merit. It is a rare excursion into the cosmos of sumptuous prose and philosophical delight as exemplified by Giles of Viterbo, Erasmus of Rotterdam, and Giordano Bruno.

It is a venture into a lost world where man’s pursuit of spiritual understanding and wisdom made for bestseller reading – and where such journeys into the uncharted territory of infinity led these philosophers to examine ideas which although rejected at the time, proved to be modern beyond their and our wildest dreams.

M.M. Bennetts is a freelance writer living in Hampshire, England.

( More stories )

Comments

1. Karen | 08.22.08

Greetings:

Those who discuss Bruno and Renaissance philosophy always seem to leave out the “H” word. The Renaissance was alive with speculation about the knowledge and wisdom of the ancients, particularly as an antidote to the ignorance and fanaticism of the day. Many turned to the pre-scientific Renaissance movement known as Hermeticism, which had a lot to do with changing our world.

Leonardo was quite interested also, but a bit more circumspect, which may have saved him from the flames. For more on this try…A Different da Vinci Code:

http://altreligion.about.com/library/davinci/bl_differentdvc.htm

2. adnan tofiq | 08.23.08

Giordano Bruno was a great philosopher who was one of the greatest minds like Erasmus,Galileo Davinci and many others who participated to transform the anciet world to our modren world by the way of returning to the great Greek and Roman civilization and culture so they set us free from the jewish tradition and its most notorious descendent Islam who take its force from crusades wars, without it ,without ottman invasions there would not be islam in oure modren civilization where nowdays facees the most dangerous threat from islam ,anybody will reach this conclusion if he may read islam history

3. Chuck Dupree | 08.24.08

Bruno was an amazing figure in many ways, and even a poor biography of him would be welcome. He helped Christianity recover from the book-burnings it had used to destroy all knowledge gathered before the supposed birth of Jesus. Those who follow Adnan Tofiq’s advice and read Islamic history will find that the Renaissance followed immediately upon the Reconquista, in which the European Christians overwhelmed the Spanish Moors, and inherited as a result copies of many of the books they had burned centuries earlier. The Muslims were not prejudiced enough to dump knowledge; the Christians were, but they recovered that knowledge through war.

Thus has the legacy of the Prince of Peace continued.

4. Ron Scheurer | 08.26.08

When someone asks if you believe in god, ask which one? For each myth about the creation of the universe, and its inevitable change to something else, there is a human created god. There are as many gods as there are people; we are the gods. The real philosophic question is: What have we created?

5. leslie cox | 08.26.08

To my thinking there is a nexus between Bruno, Caravaggio and Galileo. Caravaggio had to have been in the audience in Campo dei Fiori when Bruno was executed and Galileo was a frequent guest of the Cardinal at Palazzo Madama just off the Campo where Caravaggio worked. Artists were given favored positions at executions so as to observe the anguish in the faces of the victims. What a time and what an interesting group of people. I understand Bruno is even considered one of the fathers of Rosicrucianism. This I found from Michael White’s book, The Pope and the Heretic.

6. andrea pasini | 09.07.08

Filippo Giardano Bruno, was one of the greatest man and academist scholar; the latter was a victim of these pathological criminals religious catholic christian whims whom committed numerable crimes as did Hitler, Stalin and all despotic theocrats and oligarchic dictators! I do loathe religions as a whole; further if this so called Christ was never born, the World sure would be better and less chaotic! Better be a Nihilist than ,a : CATHOLIC and for that matter Christian , Buddist, Islamist and the whole non sense man made + invented fairy tale!

Thanks for your space!
walker.andrea@tiscali.it

7. andrea pasini | 09.07.08

…BRAVO RON SCHEURER!!!!!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.