Book Reviews
The Tales of Beedle the Bard
J.K. Rowling serves up five fairy tales for wizarding and Muggles readers alike.
By Yvonne Zipp | December 17, 2008 edition
There’s no such thing as new fairy tales. Or so a friend – just back from a teacher’s conference – explained to me. Children can’t be taught to write them, the theory goes, because fairy tales are formed from the slushy undercurrents of a culture’s subconscious and so it takes years for a “once upon a time” to fully form.
I wonder what those theorists will make of J.K. Rowling’s slim new The Tales of Beedle the Bard.
First mentioned in “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” the five tales were initially limited to seven handmade, jewel-bedecked copies that Rowling auctioned to raise money for a children’s charity.
Those of us who could never afford to raise a paddle at Sotheby’s now get our chance to delve – sans emeralds – into “The Wizard and the Hopping Pot” and “Babbity Rabbity and Her Cackling Stump.” The “new translations,” courtesy of Hermione Granger, are accompanied by scholarly commentary by the late Albus Dumbledore and illustrations by Rowling herself.
Such stories are very similar to Muggle fairy tales, Rowling explains, except that the main characters can perform magic themselves and aren’t prone to “taking a prolonged nap or waiting for someone to return a lost shoe.”
The stories range from the humorous “Hopping Pot,” which forces its wizard owner to be nice to his Muggle neighbors, to the bloody “The Warlock’s Hairy Heart,” my least favorite.
The book is a bit short to justify its $13 price tag. Three or four more tales would make it feel more complete, but fans should find it good fun.
Different from the Muggle world, the commentary here is perhaps more delightful than the stories. So don’t skip the footnotes.
Dumbledore offers historical context and throws in tidbits such as excerpts from the treacly adaptations of Beatrix Bloxam.
While most Muggle parents will probably find the bard’s stories mercifully tame, Mrs. Bloxam worried about “their unhealthy preoccupation with the most horrid subjects, such as death, disease, bloodshed, wicked magic, unwholesome characters, and bodily effusions and eruptions of the most disgusting kind.”
If that weren’t enough to send kids running for a copy, all the profits go to help needy children.
Yvonne Zipp regularly reviews fiction for the Monitor.
( More stories )
Comments
2. Laura Brown | 12.18.08
I think it is wonderful that the proceeds are going to charity. We need conspicuous charity from those who can afford it in these days when so many are hurting. I wish the press would make a bigger deal out things like this so we readers can make wiser decisions as to where our gift giving money goes.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. Peter | 12.17.08
” the five tales were initially limited to seven handmade, jewel-bedecked copies that Rowling auctioned to raise money for a children’s charity.”
My understanding is that Rowling made seven copies, gave six to friends, and auctioned the seventh.
Muggles! Can’t trust them to get anything right!