Twitter jumps the shark: Yemma tweets
By John Yemma | 04.17.09
Part Pokemon, part NORAD, Twitter is many things: chatterbox, public-opinion meter, posse roundup.
You can follow news in real time on Twitter: earthquakes, the Summit of the Americas, famous-for-being-famous guy Ashton Kutcher playing Pied Piper to 1 million Twitter followers.
You can also find endless nonsense: “Um, thinking of buying a bagel” “Wow. American Idol was awesome!”
Oprah does it (click here for details on her debut). So does Rainn Wilson.
Why is Twitter hot?
Twitter is a prime example of the Internet’s promise and paradox.
The Internet can accommodate almost infinite variety and depth — from War and Peace to 100 side-by-side translations of the Bible to pet beauty contests to bad remixes of videos that were bad to begin with.
Cost of publishing online is practically zero. Space is abundant. So why has an application that allows only 140 characters become the category killer of the moment?
Maybe it’s because for all of the Internet’s vaunted depth and flexibility, enforced brevity is a virtue.
Enter Twitter
Just as cable TV’s 700 channels allow every sensibility to be entertained but also foster channel surfing, the Internet fosters nonstop browsing. If the content of this article is interesting, how about those embedded hyperlinks to related articles? Wait, have you checked the UFO story on Drudge? Responded to Facebook requests? Peeked at ESPN? … And maybe Drudge has a UFO update since you last checked?
Into this easily distracted world comes Twitter. Its genius is its limitation. It piggybacks on the experience of the texting generation, where short text messages are already the standard way of communicating.
Text messaging is the most widely used data application on the planet, with several billion active users. Short messages = multiple messages. By enforcing the 140-character limit, Twitter, too, ensures a constant flow of new content.
A flow of what?
Like a lava lamp, Twitter can be endlessly diverting.
You could watch the Twitter tag cloud on Twitscoop, as I did, on Easter morning as the word “resurrection” grew in size because people all over the world were using it in their 140-character “tweets.” Or you could watch on Friday as the words “Pirate Bay” got hot because a Swedish court sentenced the founders of the file-sharing outfit to jail and a $3.6 million in damages.
It’s all there on Twitter. Along with all the other flotsam and musings and silliness of millions of Twitterers.
Over at ars technica is a six-point advice column on how to be a good Twitterer. No. 5 is my favorite: “No one expects you to force yourself to tweet just for the sake of tweeting if nothing is popping into your head naturally.”
Words to live by.
____________
How do you know when a fad like Twitter has jumped the shark? A graybearded editor joins Oprah in tweeting for the first time.
<< Rebuilding nature: a preview of the next Monitor weekly | MainComments
2. akin400 | 04.19.09
Finally learned enough about Twitter to begin to understand why it’s getting so much hype, and why so many can’t wait to tweet!
3. shadowsprite | 04.22.09
Ever wonder why so many people can’t find the time for spiritual study, deep reflexion and meditation? Why do they tell you they can never get outside for a walk at lunch? Does their routine include Mac Donald’s because they have no time to cook ‘real’ food?
Adding tweeting to their daily activities of perusing Facebook, jumping from one hyperlink to another, reading all their favorite blogs, and carrying on with inane conversations on their cell phone may show that as a society we have an addiction to talking about life rather than living it on a more essential level.
What do you think?
4. David K. McClurkin | 04.24.09
Agree fully - and also note that Editor John hasn’t posted here in the week since he fell under the Twitter temptation, or would that be “twemptation” instead? Just connecting the dots here!
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. David K. McClurkin | 04.17.09
Limit is based on the 160-character SMS transmission protocol using 20 characters for user name, leaving only 140 for the Tweet. Who knew?
(Above is proof that normal language can survive in a Twitter world.)