Real estate woes seep into malls, office towers
The Treasury readies $1 trillion to buoy faltering properties.
By Ron Scherer | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor/ March 9, 2009 edition
Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor
The John Hancock Tower in Boston has lost more than half its value since 2006, according to an estimate by one real estate adviser.
Reporter Ron Scherer discusses the financial problems some commercial real estate developers are running into.
Reporter Ron Scherer
New York
Now it’s the real estate developers who are slated to get a bailout.
By April, the federal government expects to have a plan to refinance office towers and shopping centers in danger of defaulting. The scale is likely to be massive: Last week Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke hinted at providing another $1 trillion in credit.
The goal, he said, is to head off a “looming crisis” that could spread far beyond “For Rent” signs and shuttered mall shops. For now, commercial delinquencies are few. But office vacancy rates are heading toward record levels, according to one estimate, and banks are exposed, with $1.72 trillion in commercial real estate loans outstanding as of Feb. 18.
Just as significant, many insurance companies and pension funds have invested in real estate, putting them at risk, as well.
“The need is urgent,” says Kenneth Rosen, a professor of real estate at the University of California in Berkeley. “It is important to get this done before we have another problem.”
Due: $300 billion
This year some $300 billion in loans to developers are due to be refinanced by commercial banks. Given the decline in the economy, many real estate ventures might not be able to survive if they are not able to refinance their loans on better terms more reflective of today’s economic conditions. But banks are largely refusing to refinance as the properties drop in value.
Any bailout of real estate developers – some of whom are known for their extravagant living (think Donald Trump) – would essentially be part of the continuing bank rescue. “The banks have significant exposure,” says Mr. Rosen.
To help free up money for commercial real estate, the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve are expected to offer refinancing through a federal program called the Term Asset-backed Loan Facility (TALF) next month. TALF is already providing a backstop for securitized debt such as credit cards and auto loans.
Skyscrapers and pension funds
Yet the concern for the commercial real estate market goes beyond banks to the insurance companies and pension funds who have invested in real estate or made loans to real estate developers.
“Now, to some extent, there is the potential to spread the financial crisis to insurance companies and peoples’ pensions,” says Jon Southard of CBRE Torto Wheaton Research, a real estate research company in Boston.
The impact of the current downturn is already being felt. The market for the packages of loans sold to investors, called Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities, has frozen completely since July. Now, even the highest-rated packages – for those ventures seen as having virtually no risk – are being marked down to produce a 11 to 12 percent interest rate.
The concern is that some large bank will be forced to sell its holdings, overwhelming the market, says Mr. Southard. “The banks are not necessarily in this as a long-term holding,” he adds.
With virtually no new loans available for new commercial buildings, “everything is being postponed,” says Rosen. “There won’t be any new construction in 2010 or 2011.”
Many of the problems for real estate moguls are being caused by the recession. With layoffs, firms are downsizing their office space needs. The national vacancy rate for offices at the end of 2008 was 14 percent, up from the recent low of 12.5 percent in the middle of 2007, Southard estimates.
“But we think it will top 20 percent in 2011,” he says. That would be an all-time high.
Lower rent prices?
As more office towers put out the “For Rent” signs, rents would likely fall. “We expect double-digit declines over the next three years,” Southard adds.
One example of how the market has worsened: Boston’s John Hancock Tower. Broadway Partners bought the iconic blue sliver of glass and steel for $1.3 billion in 2006. Today, based on rent and occupancy expectations for the Boston metro area, it may be worth as little as $575 million to $735 million, says Victor Calanog, director of research at Reis, a real estate advisory company in New York.
“When the building was purchased, that was a good year at the time, and the price was reasonable – if the good years had lasted,” says Mr. Calanog.
In Miami, rents in office towers are now down to 2003 levels, says Tere Blanca, president and CEO of Blanca Commercial Real Estate, Inc. The vacancy rate for office space is about 13 percent.
Empty shop windows at the mall
Problems are cropping up in shopping centers as well. Large regional malls had a 7.1 percent vacancy rate in the fourth quarter of 2008 – the highest level since 2000, according to Reis. “They are in trouble because, for the first time in 17 years, the consumer has scaled back their spending,” says Calanog of Reis.
When a mall operator loses a retail client, the effect may spread to other retailers in the same area.
“Empty stores in a mall deters shoppers just like it deters them in downturn areas if there is vacant space at street level,” says Todd Sinai, an associate professor of real estate at the Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. “Then if your retailers stop selling you cannot get new tenants.”
In a few cases, mall operators are delinquent on their loans. The operator of the Promenade at Dos Lagos in Corona, Calif., has missed some payments. But Joshua Poag, president and CEO of Memphis-based Poag & McEwen which runs Corona, says by e-mail that the company is current with its eight other malls.
In fact, the delinquency rate on commercial mortgages is only 1 percent at this point.
“The problem is refinancing,” says Rosen.
Opportunity among rubble
At least one debt-free real estate investor, the Gaedeke Group in Dallas, Texas, views the current situation as an opportunity.
“We are looking to buy assets,” says Belinda Dabliz, vice president of leasing. “There is a lot of debt coming due, and people have no way to restructure it.”
But if the federal bailout doesn’t happen, “we’re going to get a wave of delinquencies,” says Rosen.
Does that mean real estate developers such as Mr. Trump or Mort Zuckerman – both living the lifestyles of the rich and famous – will be looking for help from the government?
“The great hope is that every player in affected markets will somehow survive the coming – or is it here already – storm,” says Calanog. “The difficulty is ensuring that players who behaved poorly – borrowed, lent, or paid too much – are also penalized, otherwise we run into the classic moral hazard problem.”
( More stories )
Comments
2. jim | 03.10.09
This is a very interesting article.
For me, this once again indicates that the issue is not as much overexpansion as it is an inability for real estate companies to orderly refinance their normal debt as it matures because banks remain unable to provide credit to their customers.
As a free market thinker, I would rather see the reorganization of these companies than to invite big government into the deal.
3. EdG | 03.10.09
The new definition of capitalism, circa 2009 is to privatize profits and socialize losses. Farewell to the free market economy. Our nation’s leaders have decided to let us sucker taxpayers bail out the gamblers who threw away our future while we struggle vainly to hold onto what little we have.
4. Tran Harry | 03.11.09
It amazes me who these bailouts tend to help, the ones who lived high flying lifestyles above their living and business means. Than when the market becomes unsustainable due to all the bubbles these individuals created our government wants to pad their lifestyles alittle further with bailout money from tax payer pockets.
5. Patrick Faiola | 03.11.09
This country is lost, when the Government get’s into the bailout business to the degree is has means we are no longer a free market economy. Life will never be the same, personal incentive will be gone and we will slide from our standard of living.
6. C Evans | 03.11.09
The objective, of course, is to fleece the few remaining taxpayers and grow the non-productive and massively overbearing and socialist US government
7. Gordon Hill | 03.11.09
The capitalists have killed capitalism!
The conservatives have destroyed the free markets!
It is the wealthy who get the lions share of government handouts. (welfare)
Big business is being run by incompetent criminals.
The future must be built on small businesses, small government and small religion.
8. Eddy | 03.11.09
Would everyone please google Gerald Celente, Bob Chapman, Peter Schiff. Then,
Turn your television off. You are all being brain washed.
9. Matt P | 03.11.09
For those who feel we live in a socialized country - realize we don’t and stop complaining how other people live their lives whether or not its in excess. Sometimes it seems people want to remove a CEO and replace them with someone off the street in the name of equality. Truth is, the guy off the street didn’t have access to the proper education when he/she was young and once you miss this ticket, its very difficult to catch up. It’s not a fair system, so think about how do you help children who have parents who can’t dream big enough, we’re cast aside, were simply unaware or whatever. This is where people’s ability to “move up” if often lost.
I believe wealth carries responsibility - some do good while others are selfish. The founders of successful companies are not here to do it for free - does the bailout help them more than say a person living on minimum wage - of course! Is there still a lot of corrupt policies governing our business - yes, but its present in all industries and ironically most severely in government? Try taking a peek into other nations - believe it or not, although we have a lot of room for improvement, our economic system is the most transparent in the world.
So - as I reread my comments, I see I’m all over the place, I just hope we stop complaining and instead, do something, work, go back to school, volunteer, whatever you can do - do it!
10. Bob | 03.11.09
They know we’ll just keep sitting at home, watching TV and posting on the internet, and maybe once in a while they’ll have to endure a small protest from 1,000 or so slaves (taxpayers), but in the end, we’re all to lazy to do anything but complain to each other…
When will we actually show them we’ve had enough? What will it take?
11. David | 03.12.09
GREED! Got Real Estate? Not Enough Equity? Too Much Debt?
It’s hard for me to sit by and watch the blame game point to the lenders…
If you’re purchasing commercial real estate… you need to know your product and you need to know your market… and if you don’t… then you need to suffer the consequences…
If you, as an individual, are invested in these lenders, then so be it, you should suffer the consequences as well. You too had a choice of where to place your money…
And finally, as to the lenders… perhaps the greediest bunch of them all… hire better people, adjust your risk profile, and settle for more realistic returns…
And to all of you… maybe if it sounds to good to be true - it really is…imagine that!
12. Matt | 03.14.09
The TALF bailout of CMBS will not have an effect because the Fed will be committing $ to the investment grade tranches of these prospective CMBS syndications. You can’t have AAA bonds without B shares to carry the equity risk and those investors are getting hammered in completely illiquid CMBS deals of the past several years. They are not going to pony up $ and take all of the risks just because Bernacke agrees to buy the AAA piece. Besides, when your CRE asset’s NOI is down 20% and cap rates are up 300 bps from when you bought it with 80% leverage, why would anyone lend you 120% LTV so you can refinance your deal? Not going to happen.
13. Miami Beach condos | 03.18.09
Great article. Commercial real estate seems to be taking a backseat in terms of industry media coverage. I appreciate the fact that this blog article is dedicated to commercial real estate issues.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
1. Government Moving Towards Bailout of Commercial Real Estate | Square Feet Commercial Real Estate Blog | 03.09.09
4. Access Real Property » Blog Archive » Real estate woes seep into malls, office towers | csmonitor.com | 03.11.09
5. Real estate woes seep into malls, office towers | csmonitor.com | Money Blog : 10 Dollars : Money Articles. | 03.11.09
6. Actual Estate World » Blog Archive » Real estate woes seep into malls, office towers | csmonitor.com | 03.11.09
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.





1. tom | 03.10.09
Where are all the the comments in vigorous defense of the free market by conservatives for this article? I haven’t heard much from the free market opinionators defending the practice of letting failing businesses fail.