Congress passed a bill this week bringing relief to overburdened credit-card users, but the companies are trying to make up the lost revenue with other fees and cuts in reward programs.
(Paul Sakuma/AP/File)Photos (1 of 1)
Credit-card firms already trimming rewards
By Laurent Belsie | 05.21.09
Will Congress’s newly passed credit-card reforms – intended to help consumers – really hurt them?
That’s the debate online in places like here and here. The reality is that the changes that critics are warning about are already taking place.
Think back over the last few months. Have you gotten one of those gobbledygook notices alerting you to changes in your credit-card agreement? (What? You didn’t read it in full?)
“They don’t take out ads, saying: ‘We’re cutting our rewards program,’ ” said Bill Hardekopf, CEO of LowCards.com, an online credit-card comparison site. “It’s done in a very subtle manner.”
Fewer triple points
Take the Chase Freedom card. It used to be that it offered customers three bonus points for every dollar spent on the three categories where they spent the most money. In January, that changed to three bonus points for each dollar spent on gas, groceries, and fast food, Mr. Hardekopf pointed out in a telephone interview. That same month the Discover Miles card switched its new-customer offer from 12,000 bonus miles on their first purchase to 1,000 miles a month (up to 12,000) as long as customers made a purchase each month.
These are small changes. Hardekopf expects more: trims in reward programs, higher fees, and the imposition of annual fees on some cards.
The industry has known for months that, at a minimum, it would lose revenue next year because of new Federal Reserve rules. Congress’s newly passed law will increase those losses (for details of what the new legislation does, click here). So like any industry, credit-card companies will try to recoup those revenues.
The power of you
Whether they succeed depends on you. If you and tens of thousands of other users cancel their cards once an annual fee is imposed, guess what? The companies will quit doing that. Ditto for sky-high interest rates and other revenue-generators.
There’s no law of economics that says the credit-card industry has to be a certain size or generate a certain amount of revenue. Ultimately, it will offer what brings profit. If that means slimming down and servicing fewer accounts, they’ll do it.
Here’s a thought for any industry executives toying with imposing $10 annual fees: Quit sending me all those credit-card offers. That would save you far more than $10 a year. Trust me.
_____________
Do you need all the credit cards you carry? Comment here or Twitter us.
Comments
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.







1. David K. McClurkin | 05.21.09
There is a troubling aspect, touched on in this: “Take the Chase Freedom card. In January, that changed to three bonus points for each dollar spent on gas, groceries, and fast food…” At least three card ads I’ve seen this week are saying “It’s alright to use the card for groceries, to provide for your family.”
This is making a play to draw more debt onto the books of already cash strapped consumers. Credit card debt makes sense to buy larger ticket items with durability and utility, but unless there is an actual practice of paying for all consumables in full each month, going into deeper debt for those essentials is a wrong step.