Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper (left), Mexico's President Felipe Calderón, and US President Obama held a three-nation summit Monday in Guadalajara, Mexico. The economy was one of three items on their agenda.
(Eliana Aponte/Reuters)Photos (1 of 1)
Obama: ‘Buy American’ hasn’t hurt trade
By Laurent Belsie | 08.10.09
Job losses. Bankruptcies. Business failures. They’ve all been part of the world’s great recession, just as they were part of all previous downturns.
But one effect has largely gone missing: protectionism.
So when President Obama and his counterparts in Canada and Mexico each emphasized their nations’ rejection of protectionist measures in Monday’s three-nation summit in Guadalajara, Mexico, they could afford to make pro forma statements rather than special pleading for global restraint.
That is no small accomplishment for the world’s global trading system. Despite a plunge in exports and imports in many nations around the world, governments have mostly avoided tit-for-tat moves against imports. In the 1930s, a rapid slide toward protectionism among large nations lengthened and worsened the Great Depression.
That’s not to say that current protectionist measures haven’t edged up. Nations’ initiations of antidumping duties – a tax on imports – rose 28 percent from 2007 to 2008, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said in its annual report (.pdf) late last month.
The US itself has come under fire for a “buy American” provision in the Obama administration’s stimulus plan, which forces companies receiving stimulus money to buy American raw materials and equipment.
But when asked about it at a post-summit news conference, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper only said the issue would probably crop up again. Mr. Obama tried to put it “in perspective.”
“We have not seen some sweeping steps toward protectionism,” Obama said. The provision “was introduced at a time when we had a very severe economic situation, and it was important for us to act quickly…. [But] this in no way has endangered the billions of dollars of trade taking place between our two countries.”
That same general tenor – examples of protectionism but not a radical outbreak – seems to be holding, so far, for the rest of the world, according to the WTO’s recent report. “Evidence to date suggests some increase in the use of measures that restrict trade, but so far against a background of general restraint.”
_____________
– Don’t forget to Twitter us.
Comments
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. James Corbin | 08.10.09
Protectionism is a dirty term used by the news media to describe the thinking that American workers should not be put on the same economic footing as Chinese workers who make 1/10 the salary. America First would be a much more descriptive term. It is the belief that the American economy is for Americans first and foremost. Once we believed that cheap foreign goods should have a tariff on them to prevent driving American goods out of the market. Now, thanks to CEOs and their cozy relationship with Congress, manufacturing jobs are disappearing from America at a rapid rate and no one seems to care. One day the world will wake up and figure out that the Emperor (America) has no clothes (produces nothing but inflationary currency).