The New Economy

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. The Treasury announced Friday that it was withdrawing emergency insurance for money-market funds, a sign of improving confidence in the economy.

(Andrew Winning/AP/File)

Photos (1 of 1)

US no longer insures your money-market fund, but that’s good news

Withdrawing federal insurance is part of a broader exit strategy from the government's emergency supports for the economy, expected to gather steam this year.

By Mark Trumbull  |  Staff writer/ September 19, 2009 edition

Savers take note: Your money-market fund is no longer insured by the US Treasury.

These mutual funds, which earn interest for millions of Americans in brokerage or 401(k) accounts, rarely run into financial trouble. Almost always, they are able to maintain a reliable value of $1 per share. “Almost” is the key word, though.

Last year, one of the original money-market funds, the Reserve Primary Fund, “broke the buck” because some of it had investments issued by a certain firm called Lehman Brothers. When that Wall Street giant collapsed, Reserve’s share price fell a bit below a dollar.

In the panicked climate of last fall, concern about a broader “run” by money-market depositors caused the Treasury to step in with an unusual guarantee. Commercial banks have long been required to offer deposit insurance, covered by premiums they pay to the government. For the past year, many money-market accounts have enjoyed similar protection against losses.

The guarantees come to a stop Friday, however.

The Treasury is quietly ending the program, which was one of the emergency measures that most directly aided ordinary investors. The program insured as much as $3 trillion in money-market fund holdings, and earned about $1.2 billion in participation fees paid to the Treasury by money-market funds. Currently, assets of US money-market funds total about $3.5 trillion.

The change is a sign of improving confidence in credit markets. But it also means investors may want to take a peek at the holdings of the mutual funds that hold their cash. The funds often invest in short-term corporate debts that come due every few months. The short time horizons make the investments very safe.

But as the unexpected bankruptcy of Lehman brothers shows, ultra-safe does not mean impregnable. Analysts say it can be helpful to make sure your money fund isn’t heavily exposed to just a few firms or industries.

The withdrawal of federal insurance represents part of a broader “exit strategy” from the government’s emergency supports for the economy, which is expected to gather steam this year and next.

“As the risk of catastrophic failure of the financial system has receded, the need for some of the emergency programs put in place during the most acute phase of the crisis has receded as well,” Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said Friday in a statement regarding the change.

The Treasury statement said that maintaining confidence in the markets for such short-term debts was “critical to protecting the integrity and stability of the global financial system.”

The program helped achieve that end. But the fact that it was needed means policymakers need to think about how to best avoid a repeat in the future.

For now, policymakers appear confident that the absence of federal insurance won’t cause investors to flee the funds for safer bank savings accounts and the like. Many investors are shifting out of money funds simply because the interest rates are so low (nearly zero now) and the stock market has had growing appeal.

Still, the market-tracking firm Wrightson ICAP reports an extra uptick in depositor withdrawals from money funds as the Friday expiration drew near.

—–

Follow us on Twitter.

( More stories )

Comments

1. RHarrisonScott | 09.20.09

This bit of news sent shivers down my spine because I just deposited a significant chunk of money in a Citibank money market account. I imagine there may be lot of folks like myself wondering if this is going to put their money market bank accounts at risk. Found the following which assuaged my fears.

http://www.money-rates.com/blog/2009/09/money-market-accounts-money-market-funds-and-september-18.htm

Now I’ll have that martini.

2. CPICK | 09.21.09

This is a risk……the mainstreet economy is not better….this is a depressionary process …..we kicked the can down the road (and missed the sign that said dead end)

Debt is choking the economy off……..large institution needs to write off the debt…or we need to devalue the dollar BY HALF which would wipe out the debt burden by half……..politicians will wait for a emergency before they do either….so…..we muddle thru to the next crisis

3. Chris from Colorado | 09.21.09

Whether or not the FDIC is insuring funds should be immaterial. The FDIC is getting stretched to the limit with the bank failures. That along with the mounting Federal debt could make the FDIC insolvent.

Although we have somewhat of a market bounce now, the same happened in April 1930, and the market continued to head down. Cycles converged on RE, Equities, Commodities and Bonds aggrivated by the Lehman Brothers failure and the credit debacle. The government is on a spending spree (you can’t spend your way out of debt), so the investor/saver has to be very diligent on where to place their money. Best to proceed as if the FDIC never existed in the first place.

4. Mark Flanagan | 10.21.09

FDIC is not now, nor will it be in the future, insolvent. They are getting more money from their banks to replenish their coffers. In addition, they have the deep pockets of the US Government to turn to as well if they need it. FDIC is considered zero risk insurance because it enjoys the full faith and credit of the US Government.

Please try not to increase or incourage the fear mongering that the press loves to do.

In addition, though I don’t want the government to continue to waste money, it is not true that you can’t spend your way out of debt. If the government was more thoughtful, it could spend money on things that would pay off in increased revenues in the future which would be used to pay down our debt.

I am not of the opinoin that either party has the intelligence to accompish this.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.