The New Economy

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden discusses the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (C) and Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley (R) in the Eisenhower Executive Office building in Washington, Friday.

(Jason Reed/Reuters)

Photos (1 of 1)

Economic stimulus: which states have gained the most jobs

The White House says the economic stimulus accounts for 640,000 jobs. But the picture is mixed across the US.

By Mark Trumbull  |  Staff writer/ October 30, 2009 edition

Some 640,000 jobs exist nationwide as a direct result of the government’s record economic stimulus program, the Obama administration reported Friday.

The White House released a detailed tally, allowing Americans to see how many jobs have been saved or created in their own state or ZIP code. California and North Carolina were among the states reaping the most jobs so far, on a per capita basis. Both those states have higher-than-average unemployment rates, and the administration highlighted this pattern.

“The Recovery Act is creating jobs where they are needed the most,” White House economist Jared Bernstein said in a report accompanying the data, which are viewable at http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx.

According to the Christian Science Monitor’s initial review of the data, the White House report found that $159 billion in stimulus spending is providing nearly 2100 jobs for every million people in the country. That number, again, reflects direct impacts reported by states and businesses receiving the money.

California and North Carolina have each reaped more than 3,000 jobs per million people.

Although the White House appears to be correct that many hard-hit states have reaped above-average job gains, some states with higher-than-average unemployment lag behind. Florida shows about 1,600 jobs per million residents, and Ohio 1,500. Michigan and Nevada, hit hard by an automotive recession and housing slump, respectively, report job gains that are barely above average.

Friday’s White House report covers much of the spending that has occurred under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act this year, but not all. It includes federal contracts and grants to states.

The report does not track the impact of expanded safety net programs (like unemployment insurance), tax cuts, or small business lending. Those programs are also having an impact on US consumer spending and hence on jobs.

Western states fared well.

The states with the biggest job gains, on a per capita basis, are Montana and Washington State (both with more than 5,000 per million residents). Alaska came in third. The states showing the fewest jobs were Texas and Pennsylvania, with about 800 and 600 jobs per million residents, respectively.

Teaching and construction jobs made up a large share of all jobs saved or created under the stimulus, thanks largely to aid flowing to state and local governments.

In a conference call with reporters, administration officials said the jobs also flowed in some cases to areas with lots of federal facilities (including the District of Columbia) or nuclear-waste cleanups under way.

Critics say the stimulus is failing to lift the job market, noting the continued rise in unemployment since its passage. Supporters say joblessness would be even worse without it. The data released is sure to generate more fodder for the debate.

Mr. Bernstein sought to defuse one criticism in the conference call, by saying that it’s inaccurate to divide the total dollars spent by the jobs number to get a “cost per job” amount. That would leave out indirect effects, he said, plus “there’s much more hiring in the pipeline” as the money allocated is not yet fully spent.

—–

Follow us on Twitter.

( More stories )

Comments

1. Michael Graves | 10.31.09

Let’s get some people’s names connected with these 640,000 jobs. Otherwise we already know this idea of saved or created jobs is total BS. My guess is that we will never see people’s names associated with these phantom jobs.

2. Rob Lee | 10.31.09

Well, The Oregonian named two researchers receiving almost one million dollars to work on better treatment for methamphetamine addicts: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/stimulus_spending_adds_nearly.html In fact, there’s an image of the two smiling ear to ear.

My wise elderly friend said it years ago: “Raw resources have been decimated. Now they’re coming after us.”

3. Robert | 10.31.09

Obama is a liar and a fool. He promised the unemployment rate would not exceed 8% if we pass his stimulus plan, but we’ve blown past that and are now near 10%. Was he lying or was he simply naive? Whichever the case, he’s a clown and this country will suffer tremendously under his leadership. And the Dems in Congress are no better. The Republicans didn’t do a great job when they had the power, but the Dems are much worse. We must fight like mad now to save our country.

4. Armando A. | 11.03.09

If you divide $36 billion by 640,000 jobs, the result is $56,250. Is this how much money it really costs to generate a job? Can an expert give me a real number of how much money it takes to generate a job?

5. Alison Gray | 11.03.09

My husband advertised for an assistant with specialized qualifications. He received 2,400 applicatons.

6. Bruce from Oak Harbor | 11.05.09

Keynes is rolling over in his grave. 75% of the money will hit the street just in time to give temporary government jobs to folks…right about the time of the 2010 elections. Even though I don’t agree with the concept of stimulus, Obama was stabbed in the back by Pelosi and Reid. This is no stimulus bill. Go to a library with TCWLJMK thecollectedworksoflordjohnmaynardkeynes and check out volumne 17 between pages 210 or so and 420 or so. Or just re-read your Communist Manifesto and correctly identify Pelosi and Reid as Bourgous Socialists. Sorry bad spelling.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.