A humpback whale leaps out of the water in what is called breaching. The marine mammal, which is considered by the United States to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild, is frequently entangled in fishing nets or struck by boats. (AP Photo/Reed Saxon/FILE)
WWF: Wildlife down by a quarter since 1970s
By Eoin O'Carroll | 05.16.08
More than 1 in 4 animals have disappeared in the past 35 years, according to a report published Thursday by the World Wildlife Fund conservation group.
The massive loss of biodiviersity is caused by humans, say the authors of 2010 & Beyond: Rising to the Biodiversity Challenge (PDF), primarily through habitat loss, overfishing and overhunting, the introduction of invasive species, and pollution. According to the report, climate change, while not as significant as the other causes, has “the potential to become the greatest threat to biodiversity over the course of the next few decades.”
The WWF’s Living Planet Index, developed in partnership with the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) tracks some 4,000 populations of 241 fish, 83 amphibian, 40 reptile, 811 bird, and 302 mammal species. The index showed that, between 1970 and 2005, terrestrial species fell by 25 percent, marine by 28 percent, and freshwater by 29 percent. Populations of marine bird species increased from the 1970s to the mid-90s, but have plummeted 30 percent since then.
A ZSL press release said that the current extinction rate is 10,000 times faster than has been tracked in the fossil record.
ZSL scientist Jonathan Loh, editor of the report, said the severe decline was “completely unprecedented in terms of human history. You’d have to go back to the extinction of the dinosaurs to see a decline as rapid as this.
“In terms of human times-scales we may be seeing things change relatively slowly, but a decline of 30 percent in the space of a single generation is unprecedented in human history.”
The report comes ahead of next week’s meeting in Bonn, Germany, of the 189 member states of the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity, a body established in 1992 with the aim of stemming biodiversity loss. In 2002, member states pledged a “significant reduction” of species loss by 2010. Reuters reports that governments are expected to announce that they are unlikely to meet that target.
WWF had harsh words for those governments. In a press release WWF’s International Policy Director, Gordon Shepherd, called on them to fulfill their promises.
<< What polar bears get from new protected status | Main“This is not rocket science. The reason governments are failing to meet their biodiversity targets is because they haven’t provided adequate financial and technical resources. They have also failed to develop economic incentives and other measures to preserve biodiversity. In particular environment ministries must work for the active support and involvement of ministers with a mutual interest in saving biodiversity, especially those responsible for development, finance, agriculture, fisheries and climate.”
“WWF is calling on all the governments that signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2002 to do what they gave their word they would do: implement the Strategic Plan by establishing national targets and allocating sufficient financial, human and technical resources.”
Comments
2. Eoin | 05.16.08
Nolan, it sounds like you’re implying that the WWF and the London Zoological Society are fabricating their data for the purposes of financial gain. That’s a serious accusation, one that deserves to be backed up with evidence, not innuendo.
3. nolan | 05.19.08
Sorry, innuendo’s all I got. Consider this though; the higher the profile of any endangerment to any creature, the more donations that come into each society. These entities are NEVER going to release any study that might negatively impact their coffers or negate the justifications for their existence. Therefore, take their news releases with a grain, or better yet, an entire shaker, of salt. I prefer to think of my approach as common-sense skepticism.
4. dylan | 07.03.08
It takes millions of dollars and many years of research to produce a study that provides an accurate assessment of the extinction rate of species on this planet.
It costs nolan nothing, and it takes him two seconds, to make the baseless accusation that WWF and ZSL have fabricated or altered their data, and to dismiss their study’s conclusions without offering any evidence of his own.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate – even pointed disagreement – is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. nolan | 05.16.08
As long as we still have the tastiest ones, I’m okay…I’m so relieved that we have the benefit of the pristine information, so unassailable and reliable, provided by groups that could have absolutely no financial incentive at all to instill any sort of extinction panic in the impressionable populace. Now we can stop polluting and eating and moving and doing anything at all, especially breathing or procreating, that might exacerbate the severity of the parasitic infection that is mankind.