Bright Green Blog
Return to Environment

A view from Park Ridge Road in Newport Beach, Calif., shows Orange County lights in the night sky. Light pollution has effects on wild species in the area. (Ryan Hodgson-Rigsbee / Orange County Register / KRT / FILE)

Light pollution harms not just stargazers

By Eoin O'Carroll | 12.01.08

NEWSCOM

A view of the Southern Milky Way from Earth. Most Americans cannot see this band of stars from their homes.


For students of astronomy, Sunday and Monday night is the equivalent of a World Cup Final, a new Mac operating system, and a Zeppelin reunion show all rolled into one.

That’s because, as Horizons guest blogger Pete Spotts noted in his post Sunday, Jupiter, Venus, and the moon will gather to direct a lopsided frown at North America, an arrangement that won’t happen again for another 44 years.

But even on a clear night, many would-be astronomers are missing out on this rare celestial scowl, instead being treated to a dull haze punctuated by only the nearest or brightest objects, Jupiter not being one of them. So pervasive is this murky veil that the National Park Service estimates that two-thirds of Americans cannot see the Milky Way from their homes. Had Carl Sagan spent his whole life in a contemporary US city, he’d no doubt have marveled at the dozens and dozens of lights dotting the firmament.

The cause of this stellar pall? Carelessly designed streetlamp fixtures, signs, and office lighting controls that pointlessly illuminate the sky, blocking our view of the universe.

Harmful to wildlife, harmful to humans

But stymied stargazers may be the least of our worries. Light pollution also wreaks havoc on ecosystems. Migratory birds, accustomed to navigating by the stars, smack into brightly lit office buildings. Others endlessly circle spotlights and gas flares until they drop dead by the thousands. Owls lose the element of surprise over their prey. Rodents forage more cautiously. Insects are drawn to their deaths. Frog orchestras miss their cues. Mating schedules get thrown off. Migrations start late, consigning itinerant creatures to starvation.

And then there’s the baby sea turtles. For almost the entire history of the species, the brightest object in the night sky was the moon, which hatchlings would use to guide them to the ocean. But with the rise in poorly designed artificial lighting, the young reptiles are now likely to strike out toward the minimart across the highway from the beach.

It’s not just animals who are being flummoxed by our efforts to create a permanent daylight. As this month’s National Geographic points out, we’re making an end-run around our own circadian rhythms. Verlyn Klinkenborg writes:

For the past century or so, we’ve been performing an open-ended experiment on ourselves, extending the day, shortening the night, and short-circuiting the human body’s sensitive response to light. The consequences of our bright new world are more readily perceptible in less adaptable creatures living in the peripheral glow of our prosperity. But for humans, too, light pollution may take a biological toll.

Not even safe

It would be one thing if all this light contributed to public safety, that is, if the illumination actually reduced the chances of a nighttime collision or mugging. But many of our light fixtures cast light sideways and upwards, temporarily blinding us and creating dark spots that we could otherwise see into. As the New Yorker’s David Owen wrote last year, our light fixtures tend to create “glare bombs” that obscure as much as they illuminate.

Much so-called security lighting is designed with little thought for how eyes—or criminals—operate. Marcus Felson, a professor at the School of Criminal Justice at Rutgers University, has concluded that lighting is effective in preventing crime mainly if it enables people to notice criminal activity as it’s taking place, and if it doesn’t help criminals to see what they’re doing. Bright, unshielded floodlights—one of the most common types of outdoor security lighting in the country—often fail on both counts, as do all-night lights installed on isolated structures or on parts of buildings that can’t be observed by passersby (such as back doors). A burglar who is forced to use a flashlight, or whose movement triggers a security light controlled by an infrared motion sensor, is much more likely to be spotted than one whose presence is masked by the blinding glare of a poorly placed metal halide “wall pack.” In the early seventies, the public-school system in San Antonio, Texas, began leaving many of its school buildings, parking lots, and other property dark at night and found that the no-lights policy not only reduced energy costs but also dramatically cut vandalism.

An easy fix

Fortunately, of all types of pollution, light pollution is probably the easiest to fix. In most cases, it’s simply a matter of aiming low.

The International Dark-Sky Association, a collection of astronomers, environmentalists, and others devoted to combating destructive outdoor lighting, has developed a certification program for fixtures that enhance visibility while directing light only where it is needed, that is, at the ground.

An example of this is a streetlamp whose bulb is flush with the hood, so that light is directed only below the horizontal. Other fixes include installing timed or motion-sensitive residential lights, improving light controls in office buildings so that they use light only where it is needed, and avoiding over-illumination.

As a bonus, many of these steps also save energy. According to the US Energy Information Administration, Americans spend about a quarter of their electricity on lighting, at an annual cost of more than $37 billion.

And let’s not discount the joy of looking up and seeing, instead of a drab void, a boundless expanse of stars. Such a spectacle, which for too many Americans is relegated to a once-a-year camping trip, could help all of us appreciate the scale of the universe and our place in it. It might just remind us of the improbability and precariousness of our existence here on earth, and might even inspire us to work a little harder to preserve it.

<< New bluefin catch rule riles scientists | Main

Comments

1. Ben | 12.02.08

Oh, tell me about it! For years now my family has lived in rural West Virginia in the mountains. For years we could see all the stars in the sky when walking out onto the porch on a summer evening. However, within the past five years our neighbor installed a bright dusk-to-dawn light. It seems you cannot escape urbanity even in the quiet Appalachians.

2. Francis Parnell | 12.03.08

My friends and I grew up in the late 50’s and early 60’s, and at night we’d stand out in the fields behind our homes and stare, fascinated at the thousands of stars we could see. In 1967 I became an amateur astronomer; even then thousands of stars were still visible. But, as the decades have passed, the beautiful dark sky has disappeared behind a curtain of wasted light. Light pollution is so easily fixed, but politicians just don’t seem to “get it.” Maybe one day they will.

3. Graham Cliff | 12.04.08

The wider implications of light pollution LP or light at night LAN include insect decline meaning insectivores starve, loss of the night and so nocturnal creatures are compromised (bats, whip-poor-wills, night jars etc)) and we humans suffer circadian disruption caused by LP/LAN - the 24 hour day which we “enjoy” in the west. The problem is few understand or even care? By the time they do it may well be JIT - Just Too Late!

4. Stephen M Pauley MD | 12.05.08

Potential harm to humans from eye exposure to light at night is no longer just theory. Grave yard shift workers have higher incidences of breast and colorectal cancers. The World Health Org. now lists light at night as a “probable carcinogen.” Along with algae and the rest of the animal kingdom, human melatonin production is related to day-night circadian rhythms. Melatonin is an oncostatic (cancer preventive)hormone, and its production from the pineal gland is inhibited by eye exposure to light at night. A recent Israeli study showed that women in light polluted towns have a 70% higher incidence of breast cancer than those living in darker towns. Light pollution levels were measured by overhead satellites. More light does not equate to better light. Solution: fully shielded, downward shining lights, and sleep in total darkness. Get rid of unneeded outdoor lights. Enjoy the night sky. Those stars are our ancestors. Get to know them.

5. Colin Henshaw | 12.08.08

I would just like to concur with the comments posted here. Light at Night is an insidious cancer of the environment that is doing untold damage, not only to ourselves, but the environment at large. Thousands of cities world-wide are cooking the atmosphere, all night, every night, three hundred and sixty-five nights a year. Most organisms are regulated by a twenty-four hour day-night cycle, and once disturbed their behaviour is compromised, often with fatal results. Not only that, a substantial amount, possibly around 40%, of all global warming is photogenic, yet this is the easiest problem to solve - switch off all unnecessary lighting, and install better lighting fixtures where they are needed. The ideal design for street lighting would be 45 degree cut-off, that is even better than full cut-off as it minimises light intrusion even further. Even with full cut-off, light pollution is still a problem due to reflectance off road surfaces, as I have seen flying over the Middle East where a lot of this kind of lighting has been installed. To minimise this impact, 11.00p.m. curfews need to be imposed on minor roads to restore the natural balance between day and night. Outdoor lighting in rural areas is totally inappropriate. All domestic security lighting should be shielded, downward-pointing, and motion operated. The only appropriate outdoor lighting policy should be “When needed, where needed, and in the correct amounts.” Otherwise we will be provoking an unprecedented natural disaster through global warming and environmental degradation.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.