The Brazza River on the island of New Guinea as it appeared to the author on a trip to seek out the primitive Korowai tribe of Papua. (Danna Harman)
Jungle diary: I set out in search of Papua’s cannibals.
Where is it, why do you want to go there, and why couldn’t I have had normal children, my mother asks.
By Danna Harman | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor/ December 17, 2008 edition
Danna Harman
Villagers encountered along the river have had much contact with Westerners.
Dekai, Indonesia
Part 1 of a four-part series. Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4
Why Papua? My mom asks me. And where is it, anyway? I have no immediate answers. But a week later I have not only found it on a map and purchased all forms of cool camping paraphernalia (think quick-dry towels and waterproof socks) but also come up with a philosophy to explain the importance of voyaging across the world to this tropical land. My mom closes her eyes, raises her eyebrows, and wishes she had normal children.
The sparsely populated island of New Guinea, the second-largest island in the world after Greenland, is divided between two countries: the independent nation of Papua New Guinea in the east, and the Indonesian Papua in the west – formally known as Irian Jaya. More than 75 percent of Papua is covered by impenetrable jungle, and is home to a wide diversity of plant and animal life, as well as an array of indigenous, so-called “primitive” tribes – many of whom have little or no contact with the world outside.
Believed to number some 3,000 to 4,000 people, the Korowai of southeastern Papua are one such tribe. They were “discovered” in the 1970s but remain isolated. They hunt with bows and arrows, subsist for weeks on roots and beetle larvae, are illiterate, and don’t wear clothing. They practice polygamy, believe in witchcraft, and live in scattered treehouses some 25 feet off the ground. They are also thought to be among the last people in the world to practice cannibalism.
Thoughts of traipsing into the jungle to meet Korowai begin to fill my imagination. “Are there actually tribes with no knowledge of modern life?” I wonder. “Is cannibalism still practiced?” “Is the jungle really so dense you can’t get through it?” “Might such a trip be a good way to lose weight?” And beside all this: “Why is all this ‘otherness’ so inherently compelling to me?”
That last is a good question to chew on. The answer probably has much to do with trying to understand myself. Perhaps seeing how others make sense of the world around them will give me some insight into my own. “Good luck,” says my brother.
I set out with Adam, a TV producer and fellow searching soul, who has a three-week vacation. He packs unread New Yorkers in a special watertight pouch, buys a spear gun (“for fishing, idiot,” he explains when he sees my face), and we set off, stopping for lattes and mini-ginger muffins at our favorite hip Tel Aviv cafe en route out of the country.
The journey to Papua is not short. We drive across the border to Jordan and from there fly to Qatar, watching the latest Indiana Jones movie on our personal TV monitors and daydreaming about discovering new tribes. After a seven-hour layover, we get on another flight – 12 hours – to Jakarta, where it turns out (surprise!) the spear gun sticking out the top of Adam’s knapsack had been offloaded in Doha, Qatar.
Twenty-four hours and many new friends at the Qatar Airways lost and found office later, we are back on track, with a complete luggage set. We fly overnight to Jayapura, the capital of Papua, and on to Wamena in the highlands. It’s pouring rain, dark, and buggy as we leave the airstrip, and we speak not one of the reported 300-odd languages used here. Male members of the Dani tribe – best known for their kotekas, conical gourds used to cover their privates – wander around town wanting to shake hands.
We begin to realize that part of the reason so few tourists come to Papua (fewer than 800 last year, according to The Lonely Planet guidebook) is not solely because no one is as intrepid as we are, it’s also because no one is as uninformed. Traveling into the jungle, it quickly turns out, is not only dangerous, time-consuming, and physically challenging – it costs a fortune. Who knew, for example, just how expensive hiring a motorized canoe could be?
We spend days negotiating, finally putting our faith (and close to $3,000) in the hands of our newfound guide and translator, Isak. And then off we go, by small plane – the cost of which is calibrated according to one’s weight – to Dekai, a dusty village on the edge of the Brazza River.
There, we meet up with Lakor, a young cook who does not stop smiling and who knows how to make rice topped with instant Ramen noodles and nothing else. He joins our party and we spend another two days in protracted renegotiations over money while swatting mosquitoes and eating cookies filled with pineapple cream.
Finally, armed with just about enough information for a PhD thesis on motorized canoes in Papua, we pick up our travel permits from the local police chief, lower ourselves into the dugout, and motor 10 hours downriver, mainly in pouring rain, to the improbably even smaller village of Mabul.
Moving right along, we recruit four Korowai tribe teenagers who will be our porters: Gershon, who has the use of only one leg; silent Lucas; Solomon, who is adorned in colorful beads; and little Titus, whose father, we are told, was eaten by the Kombai tribe last year.
A week and a day after leaving home, we march bravely into the jungle. I immediately fall off a log and ram my left shin. The adventure has begun.
Part 1 of a four-part series. Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4
( More stories )
Comments
2. Marilyn | 12.31.08
Just getting to this now, and re the comment above, I have my doubts that anyone who can use the phrase “en route out of the country” (and no editor caught this??) is a particularly experienced journalist.
3. neil miller | 02.23.09
Why can’t you leave these people alone? The missionaries in Victoria’s times did the same in Africa and gave the poor natives the common cold killing thousands perhaps millions.
Would you like your life being photographed for a handful of cheap beads? I only hope they cut off your stupid heads and put them on a pole.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.




1. Brigham Golden | 12.22.08
I am an Athropologist at Columbia University who has studied (West) Papua for nearly two decades. I will be watching this article carefully, because I have deep concerns about where it is going.
Accounts of trips to Korowai/Kombai territory such as your own invariably succumb to a key misunderstanding–well illustrated in Lawrence Osborne’s piece in the New Yorker, from April 2005.
This misunderstanding involves an assumption about the nature and signs of human isolation. For though the Korowai might appear to be the most untouched and isolated peoples in Papua, in fact they are not. Indeed as many as a hundred adventure tourists a year travel into their communities seeking encounter with ‘untouched natives’. This actually makes it among the more well touristed parts of interior Papua! The people of the Rouffaer Basin, for example are far more isolated than the Korowai. But no one goes there. Why not? Because these peoples do not conform to the vision of the primitive and isolated people that curious people like yourself are looking for. They are more than happy to use any modern object they can manage to get their hands on–usually through trade with neighboring tribes. The Korowai, as you surely know now, are not willing to use such objects due to their strong fears of the exogenous.
The Korowai are, quite simply, the Amish of Papua. And like the Amish they are well aware of the curiosity the outside world has to them–and are trying to figure out a way to negotiate that interest to their own advantage within the context of their strongly held beliefs.
I should also note that if your piece must at least acknowledge the greater political context in which the Korowai live–and by this I mean the long history of political oppression and socio-economic marginalization of Papuan people by the Indoensian State. Surely you saw this for yourself while you were in Papua. To ignore this is, in my strong opinion, to particpate directly in that opression and marginalization by presenting a primitivst caricature in the place of real suffering Papuans.
I should add that I have always held the CSM’s work on Papua in high regard. In fact, I was consulted for a number of articles about the region by Daniel Murphy when he was in Indonesia. I can only hope that you continue that high standard of journalism and do not succumb to the crude sterotypes of a primitivst fantasy–what we Anthropologists call “cannibal tourism”.
For more on my work in Papua: http://www.asiasource.org/asip/papua_golden.cfm
-Brigham Golden
Columbia University