Bright Green Blog

Activists from Oxfam, wearing masks of the G8 heads of state, perform in downtown Rome on Wednesday.

(Remo Casilli/Reuters)

Photos (1 of 1)

Will G-8 countries move faster on climate change?

In the post-Bush era, the major industrial nations meeting this week face pressure to set firm temperature and emission-reduction goals.

By Peter N. Spotts  |  Staff writer/ July 8, 2009 edition

In the 18 months since work began in earnest on a new global climate treaty, the world has been waiting for industrial countries – especially the US – to signal that they know deep cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions must occur soon to avoid the worst effects of global warming. Hopes are running high that this week’s meeting of leaders from the Group of Eight – countries that represent the world’s eight richest economies – will provide that signal.

Climate change is an issue that looms large on the agenda at the economic meeting that begins Wednesday in L’Aquila, Italy. The G-8 event is sandwiched between two United Nations-sponsored negotiating rounds aimed at crafting a new global-warming treaty to pick up where the 1997 Kyoto Protocol leaves off at the end of 2012. Negotiators say they hope the outlines of a treaty will be ready for approval at December’s climate-change summit in Copenhagen.

The G-8 meeting also overlaps with the US-sponsored Major Economies Forum. Former President Bush established it to bring the largest emitters together, along with key developing countries, to try to find ways to smooth out bumps in UN negotiations. Progress has been slow since a road map for talks was set out at the 2007 UN climate summit in Bali.

New momentum from the US

Now, however, the US has a president disposed to act more aggressively on the issue than did his predecessor. And in Congress, the US House passed historic energy legislation last month that laid out clear climate goals.

With this additional momentum from the US, “this year the G-8 could be a game changer,” says Angela Anderson, director of the Pew Environment Group’s Global International Warming Campaign.

For that to happen, she says, the G-8 needs to clearly state that its goal is to hold global average temperature increases by century’s end to less than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above pre-industrial levels. It needs to make firm commitments to help poor countries adapt to climate change. And it needs to provide aid to developing countries so they can afford green technologies to meet any obligations under a new climate treaty and still raise their standards of living.

Cap global warming at 3.6 degrees F.?

The G-8 leaders – from the US, Japan, Canada, France, Germany, Russia, Italy, and Britain – could well acknowledge the importance of capping global warming at 3.6 degrees, say analysts in Italy watching the meeting.

“That would be a shift for the US, because President Bush was not willing to talk about trying to stay under any temperature level,” says Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy for the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington.

To achieve that goal, scientists have projected that global greenhouse-gas emissions must fall by at least 50 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. As outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, that path would require industrial countries to reduce their collective emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels, and developing countries would have to reduce emissions substantially below “business as usual.”

Last year, the G-8 meeting ended with leaders agreeing to a 50 percent reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions by 2050, but they failed to identify a base year against which to measure the effort.

Besides a G-8 acknowledgment of a temperature goal, developing countries are looking for commitments on interim goals as well.

Any long-term goal is helpful “only if it gets us closer to agreeing on near-term commitments to action,” says Elliot Diringer, vice president for international strategies at the Pew Center for Global Climate Change in Arlington, Va.

That’s an issue expected to crop up during the Major Economies Forum. So far, industrial countries have failed to agree on what targets for 2020 should look like, or the base year against which those targets would be gauged.

—–

Follow us on Twitter.

( More stories )

Comments

1. Pip | 07.08.09

Anyone who reads allot and is capable of critical thinking can plainly see that the whole proposition put forth by the Global warming crowd is a Red Herring. Just look how the term Global Warming has been discredited and how their inherent followers change the term to Climate Change. Yes, the Climate is always changing.

2. xinunus | 07.09.09

OBAMA EATS ENDANGERED BELUGA STURGEON WITH PUTIN

Quote:
Russian agencies, quoting the government’s press service, said Putin treated Obama to black caviar with sour cream, smoked beluga with pancakes and tea made in the traditional Russian samovar, a big coal-fired kettle.

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-BarackObama/idUSTRE56657E20090707

http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersComService_2_MOLT/idUSTRE5661Q520090707

WIKIPEDIA:
————–
IUCN classifies the beluga as Endangered. It is a protected species listed in appendix III of the Bern Convention and its trade is restricted under CITES appendix II. The Mediterranean population is strongly protected under appendix II of the Bern Convention, prohibiting any intentional killing of these fish.

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service has banned imports of Beluga Caviar and other beluga products from the Caspian Sea since October 6, 2005.

3. Think Again | 07.10.09

At last. At least some progress.

Come on folks, many millions around the world don’t have time.

They will die of starvation caused by droughts due to global warming while the fat cats and deniers are still ‘debating’ established science.

How about if we put all the deniers in Africa? Should change their tune quick!

4. Robert Lee | 07.10.09

It is most refreshing to finally have an American President who is concerned about Climate Change. Sadly President Bush let the American people down badly in a world where she be united on the most important issue concerning each and everyone of us.

Clean, green energy from renewable sources is the only way forward something President Obama has recognised. All developed countries need to unite and assist the undeveloped to reach common global goals.

One world, one planet, one vision!

Robert Lee
Founder
The Climate Change Challenge
http://www.climatechangechallenge.org

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.