Pakistani drivers stood beside half burnt trucks after militants attack at a terminal on the outskirts of Peshawar, Pakistan, on Sunday, April 12, 2009.

(Mohammad Sajjad/AP)

Photos (1 of 1)

NATO, US seek alternatives to Pakistan supply routes

By Anand Gopal | Correspondent 04.12.09

KABUL, AFGHANISTAN – Militants attacked a supply depot Sunday in Pakistan that serves Western forces in Afghanistan, increasing the pressure for US and NATO officials to find alternatives to their beleaguered supply lines.

In a predawn raid in the northwestern city of Peshawar, scores of Pakistani Taliban guerrillas torched trucks stationed at the supply terminal. The assault is the latest in a series that have targeted the Western supply convoys that run through Pakistan to replenish forces fighting in Afghanistan.

Attacks on convoys and depots increased dramatically in 2008 after militants gained a foothold in the Khyber Agency, an area bordering Afghanistan through which supply routes run. The guerrillas have torched more than 500 vehicles in the last year, and a number of times they even succeeded in temporarily halting the supply chain altogether.

Some 70 percent of Western supplies come through the militant-infested western Pakistan. To add to US and NATO difficulties, another major supply route via a base in Kyrgyzstan, is slated to close.

“This is strategically vital,” says Waliullah Rahmani, policy analyst with the Kabul Center for Strategic Studies. “For the Americans to win this war, it’s important to find another route.”

US officials are actively seeking such routes. A series of recently-inked agreements allow the movement of non-lethal materiel through the former Soviet Central Asian States. The Monitor recently reported on US efforts to open a supply route through Uzbekistan. Officials are also considering other, even more complicated routes that pass through the caucuses.

But the alternatives come with difficulties of their own. The new “northern route” utilizes a complex rail network through many different countries, taking longer and costing more than the Pakistani route. And American overtures to the former Soviet states, in what is widely considered Russia’s sphere of influence, might spark tensions between Washington and Moscow.

Still, Moscow fears the growing strength of Islamic militants on its flank, and may be willing to work with the US and NATO. Click here to read about it.

But replacing Pakistan supply routes completely won’t be easy. The American military uses jet fuel of a standard only produced in the Gulf States and Pakistani refineries. “This will make it hard for the US to abandon Pakistan even if the northern routes work out,” says Mr. Rahmani.

<< German magazine bags Obama ‘confession’ at G-20 | Main

Comments

1. andrei solomon | 04.13.09

no matter you will find 100 alternative routes to Afghanistan the taliban will succeed in destroying your supply lines and bit by bit a big chunk of the Pakistan will be ruled by them and guess what? in a couple of years you will find a talibanized Pakistan with atomic weapons prepared to fire those rockets, so dunnot fear Iran or NKorea, those islamic militants will evict NATO and american forces out of the area. Unfortunately for you, the crisis came at the right moment to save the taliban-militia and only a decisive action in the area meaning the total wipe-off of this guerillas will bring peace there. you are trying to buy some time putting pressure on taliban witha small force but your time has come and you don’t have time anymore.
you need to send there an entire army there and start a full scale war to overpower and bring defeat to those fanatics.

2. umesh pai | 04.13.09

It seems terroists works according desire of ISI and for Pakistaan Govt which cannot take revange against USA and to creat fear in the mind of Nato solder and think who orders these bad eliments of world

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.