The remote Pacific island-nation of Palau has agreed to a U.S. request to temporarily resettle up to 17 Chinese Muslims now held at the Guantánamo Bay detention center.
(NEWSCOM)Photos (1 of 1)
Guantánamo Uighurs: pack your bags for Palau
The tiny Pacific nation agreed Monday to accept the detainees – along with $200 million in US aid.
By Carol Huang | Asia editor 06.10.09
At last, 17 Uighurs detained in Guantánamo since 2002 and stuck in legal limbo since last year will leave the prison camp. Their departure had been delayed as the United States sought to find one country willing to defy China, which wants its “terrorists” back, and take the men in: Palau.
Where?
You know, the tiny archipelago of eight main islands and 250 islets 500 miles east of the Philippines. It’s famous for its tropical climate, tourism, and diving.
Apparently, the little Pacific nation is willing to do what Germany, Australia, Canada, and about 100 others wouldn’t. Their reluctance is probably not from the men’s terrorist inclinations – senior US officials say they pose “the least risks” of all remaining Guantánamo prisoners. More to the point are repercussions from China, which has tried to block the Uighurs from being resettled elsewhere.
Albania took in five Uighur detainees from Guantánamo in 2006 but has since refused to accept more, “partly for fear of diplomatic repercussions from China,” according to the Associated Press.
The US had refused to send them back to China out of concern they would suffer persecution. (Click here to read about the oppression of Uighurs, a Muslim minority based in western China.)
Last month, the Monitor reported (click here) about China’s efforts to block the resettlement of one Uighur detainee in Sweden. Adil Hakimjan had originally been sent to Albania but applied for asylum in Sweden while there for a human rights conference. He won his case in April, making him the first Guantánamo ex-detainee to avoid return to his homeland and instead win asylum in the European Union.)
So why is Palau willing?
For one, the superpower in its corner: the US, for which Palau was actually a trust territory until it gained independence in 1994. The US still gives Palau significant foreign aid and has guaranteed its security until 2044. The two countries are so close that native-born Palauans can enter the US without a passport or visa. Palau also uses the US dollar as its currency. Last month, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called the tiny nation one of America’s “staunchest allies.”
“This is but a small thing we can do to thank our best friend and ally for all it has done for Palau,” Palauan President Johnson Toribiong said in a statement released to the Associated Press.
China had no immediate comment on Palau’s decision.
Palau will also receive $200 million in development and other aid as thanks for taking in the Uighurs, according to two US officials speaking to the AP on the condition of anonymity. A senior State Department official quoted in The New York Times rejected the idea that the money was a quid pro quo.
Whatever the cause, it’s a generous sum, especially for a country with the population of a typical American suburb (about 20,000 people) whose gross domestic product barely tops $167 million.
Of course, Palau has experience in defying China: It’s one of just 23 nations that still recognizes Taiwan, the island that China considers part of its territory. Over the decades many countries have severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan and thrown their weight to the People’s Republic of China instead.
<< Brazil: Don’t blame it on Rio | MainComments
2. Ummmm | 06.10.09
Uhh… have these people been put on trial? What are their names, ages, backgrounds? Why were they arrested?
I’m all for closing Guantanamo, but where did this assumption of innocence come from?
3. Anne | 06.10.09
Once again, thank you so much for a clear summary of the news.
You have the best writers ever!
4. nonlawyer | 06.10.09
Dear Ummmm,
I’m no lawyer, but isn’t innocence supposed to assumed, until proven guilty? If they were not tried, it probably means that there was not enough evidence to warrant a trial.
6. Vincent Michaud | 06.10.09
I heard of their story in Courrier International a few years ago. I may not remember details very well so you should excuse me. They flee their homeland China because like Tibetan, Uighurs are sometimes massacred which is a little awward I presume you agree. Then they were intercepted in Aghanistan by US army and shipped to Guantanamo. First they thought they would be safe, they thought US were the good guy. They tried to explain their situation to US army which understood it in a peculiar way and sent them to Guantanamo. No need to say that they are left with a poor taste of America’s ideal and liberty.
8. Zach | 06.10.09
Dear Ummmm - the presumption here is that they are innocent. Thus the Constitution.
10. Jake | 06.10.09
The question is whether the CIA is keeping them around to train them and someday have them go back to China to start a revolution.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
1. Wednesday’s coverage: Mitchell to West Bank, Uighurs to Palau, Iran to vote | csmonitor.com | 06.10.09
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. bgnh | 06.10.09
we could learn a few things from palau