US Marines temporarily occupy a house after arriving in an overnight air assault near the Taliban stronghold of Nawa in Afghanistan's Helmand province on Thursday.
(David Guttenfelder/AP)Photos (1 of 1)
US offensive in Afghanistan targets Taliban stronghold
In Helmand Province, poppy cultivation funds insurgent activities. As the operation began, the US military announced a US soldier had been captured in another province.
By Ben Arnoldy | Staff writer 07.02.09
The US military launched a major offensive in southern Afghanistan today, unleashing newly arrived American manpower in a bid to stabilize the country ahead of national elections slated for August.
Nearly 4,000 US Marines and 650 Afghan soldiers and police moved into riverside towns in Helmand Province overnight. The operation marks the first major strike using some of the additional 21,000 US forces sent to Afghanistan by President Barack Obama.
As the offensive got under way, the military said that an American soldier who had been missing since Tuesday was believed to have been captured in Paktika Province, in eastern Afghanistan. A spokesman for the Taliban could not confirm that the soldier was being held by militants.
Over the past several years, British forces have struggled to permanently wrest territory in Helmand away from entrenched Taliban insurgents. The fertile province leads the nation in poppy cultivation and has become a cash cow for insurgents involved in the drug trade.
However, Helmand’s rich agriculture land and large population also make it attractive as an initial target for the new US-led counterinsurgency push, say analysts.
“It provides a lot of the drugs which are sold in order to fund the insurgency, but it also provides a lot of opportunities for turning the population around,” says Christopher Langton, a retired British Army colonel and senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. “It’s a relatively fertile province with the possibility of the cultivation of a lot of legal crops.”
Helmand’s governor, Gulab Mangal, also has proved “very proactive” in trying to restore stability, says Colonel Langton. “So the ingredients for success are there.”
Promoting a sense of security among the local population is the new mantra for the war in Afghanistan under incoming Gen. Stanley McChrystal. That will mean this operation will need to not just overrun Taliban positions by surprise, analysts say, but hold the territory convincingly – something the British struggled to do.
NATO dispatched the British forces in early 2006 after devoting virtually no peacekeepers to the province for more than four years, says Nick Grono, who is with the International Crisis Group in Brussels.
Taliban dug in during forces’ absence
In the absence of a military presence, Taliban insurgents dug in, finding fertile ground in the ethnic Pashtun stronghold and former home of Taliban leader Mullah Omar. The British assignment was by definition difficult, says Mr. Grono: “It’s a big province and you have a small force.”
The British didn’t have enough manpower or helicopters to hold territory, says Langton, “and that’s precisely what McChrystal is trying to address.”
So are 4,000 marines enough to hold? Langton thinks they are, because the operation is limited to two districts in Helmand. “Though it’s a big operation, territorially it’s quite limited – and I think that’s quite deliberate,” he says.
Grono welcomes the focus on the Helmand River Valley, one of the major Afghan population centers. In the past, he says, the US military has cleared rural areas and expected civilian forces to move in to hold and rebuild.
“Part of a smart strategy,” says Grono, “is focusing on those areas that, if they were cleared … [would] be more attractive for civilian forces to go into.”
<< Thailand: Panda-monium for newest Thai superstar | MainComments
2. Priscilla Manning | 07.02.09
I would appreciate a map detailing the area in which these operations are occurring. Afghanistan is difficult to envision.
3. Ann Rich Smith | 07.02.09
Thank you…thank you for this wonderful paper. When the daily Monitor was stopped, I certainly missed it, and the weekly I tended to let stack up. HOWEVER, now that I am into the E form, I find I read the news more than ever. I ALWAYS read and appreciate the Home Forum page with the spiritual article. Then too, I don’t think I am wasting trees as I did before when days would often pass that I didn’t read the Monitor.
It’s all very inspired. Again thank you for all your insights and efforts.
Ann Rich Smith, Phoenix, Arizona
4. Neville Gafa’ | 07.03.09
Keep up the good work.The news that can be found in this paper is huge.
Your work is much appreciated.
Neville Gafa’
Malta
Europe
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. Rubicon | 07.02.09
It seems there is something missing from this story. Obama has forgotten to “apologize” for America’s use of heroin as the source of the problem before the military offensive got underway. His teleprompter must have been broken.