Roger Federer (l.) holds the Wimbledon champion's trophy after beating Andy Roddick in five sets in Sunday's final.
(Alastair Grant/AP)Photos (1 of 1)
Wimbledon title is Federer’s Sweet 15
Federer has now won more Grand Slams than any other men's tennis player in history. Andy Roddick made it a match to remember.
By Mark Sappenfield | Staff writer 07.05.09
Perhaps the most surprising thing about a surprising Wimbledon final Sunday was that, in the end, it was not all about Roger Federer.
By the measure of Andy Roddick’s career, this could be considered an accomplishment.
By the measure of his tennis Sunday, it could be considered nothing but rank disappointment.
If the array of tennis legends fittingly seated in Wimbledon’s Royal Box had had their pick of a tennis player to play guardian at the threshold of history – someone who could deny Federer his record-setting 15th Grand Slam title – they surely would not have chosen Roddick.
The most obvious choice would have been Rafael Nadal, who at times had turned Federer into a huddled mass of despair. Instead, they got Roddick, the man Federer has beaten more times than any other top player on tour.
After one particularly galling Wimbledon final against Federer, Roddick joked that he threw the kitchen sink at Federer, “but he went to the bathroom and got a tub.”
In 20 previous matchups, Roddick had won two. In three Grand Slam finals against Federer, Roddick had won two sets. In short, Federer was Roddick’s Nadal.
He still is. The final score was 5-7,7-6,7-6,3-6, 16-14 to Federer, confirming the history many had come to see with a match all had hoped to see. But there must be some solace in a match of such quality, when the Roddick of years past – emotionally brittle and overdependent on the cannon blast of his serve – was replaced by a man whose tennis often seemed as fit for the Roman Coliseum as Centre Court.
Roddick played gladiatorial tennis Sunday. Federer did not break him until the 38th service game. That Federer still won such a match is testament to the less celebrated but perhaps most important element of his greatness: His grit.
“He gets a lot of credit for a lot of things, but not a lot of the time it’s how many matches he really digs deep and toughs it out,” Roddick told BBC after the match.
“He was having trouble picking my serve today, for the first time ever, he just stayed the course and you didn’t even get a sense that he was even really frustrated by it,” he added.
Instead, in typical Federer fashion, he out-Roddicked Roddick, serving a career-high 50 aces – some to bring him back from the brink of collapse.
On the slick grass of Wimbledon, service games can often seem the ultimate anticlimax – a formal slog through four perfunctory swings of the server’s racket, then a switching of ends. Rallies of more than four strokes were to be filed away and studied by a team of scientists like endangered species.
But the fifth set was a study in the perfection of the stroke.
A month ago, Federer had arrived at the French Open final and on the cusp of history – bidding to become the sixth man in history to win all four Grand Slam titles in a career. The match that followed, however, seemed to be merely a prelude to trophy presentation, memorable only for Federer’s joyous celebration.
Thanks to Roddick, Sunday’s Wimbledon final will not suffer from such anonymity.
<< Shrinking sheep? Ewe’ve got to be kidding me. | MainComments
2. Mona Grant | 07.06.09
WIMBLEDON FINAL
Whata great/fairminded description of the Federa/Roddick Wimbledon final.
Don’t know if your reporter heard/saw this, but when Andy Roddick was being interviewed before the semi-final game with Andy Murray, he was asked how he felt, and would it affect his playing, knowing the crowd would be cheering for Andy Murry.
With a straight face he replied No, when they are shouting Come on Andy, I will just pretend they mean me. What a hero!
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. S. Sandlin | 07.05.09
Will someone please remember that Federer beat Nadal at the Madrid Open just a month or so ago?! This was a truly great match–but, then, at Wimbledon, they all are. It’s just that, with Federer, great is great is really great and becomes superb.