Buzz: The Canadian automaker will use ultracapacitors instead of fossil-fuel engines. (Courtesy of Zenn Motors)
Ultracapacitors: the future of electric cars or the ‘cold fusion’ of autovation?
ZENN Motors says its electric car will cruise for 250 miles on a single five-minute charge. Skeptics cry shenanigans.
By Mark Clayton| Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor/ April 16, 2008 edition
Reporter Mark Clayton discusses the prospect of a new type of electric vehicle from Toronto-based firm ZENN Motors.
Reporter Mark Clayton
Ian Clifford wants to start a global revolution by building a practical, everyday car with no gasoline engine, no batteries, and no emissions.
While big Detroit automakers ponder a future plug-in car that goes 40 miles on a battery charge before its gas engine kicks in, Mr. Clifford’s tiny ZENN Motor, a Toronto maker of low-speed electric cars, announced in March that it will build a new highway-speed (80 m.p.h.) model that goes 250 miles on a charge – and can recharge in just five minutes.
Having no batteries, the new “cityZENN” model will use a breakthrough version of a common electrical storage device called an ultracapacitor to store power from a wall socket, the company says. Fuel costs to operate it would be about one-tenth of today’s gas-powered vehicle.
If that astounding claim is real (and there are many skeptics), it could revolutionize automotive travel by making all-electric cars competitive with gas-powered vehicles and easing the world’s dependence on oil.
“The big problem has always been the battery and its limits,” says Clifford, ZENN’s founder and CEO in a phone interview. “This new technology is a 180-degree shift that represents the end of fossil fuel as a transportation fuel.”
That’s because the same ultracapacitor technology could be used across the grid to provide cheap electric storage for wind and solar power, he says. In turn, this process could power millions of ultracapacitor vehicles with no emissions at all. With the cars’ fast-charge capability, recharging stations could pop up to help make even longer trips routine.
Ultracapacitors – also called supercapacitors – are more powerful cousins of the basic capacitor. With activated carbon at their core to act as a sponge for electrons, ultracapacitors can absorb power – or send a charge – far faster than batteries. They are also far more durable.
First used in the 1960s, ultracapacitors today are widely found in electronic devices such as computers. In cameras, they retract and expand zoom lens. Yet the power stored by today’s ultracapacitors is still only about 5 percent as much as a modern lithium-ion battery, far too little to power a car by themselves.
The reported breakthrough was made by ZENN’s business partner EEStor, a Cedar Park, Texas, firm headed by respected computer industry veteran Richard Weir, who’s named on the company’s patent. The company is now nearing commercial production of its new “electrical energy storage unit” or EESU, Clifford says.
But privately held EEStor has had little to say publicly or to the press – and that secretiveness has inspired incredulity among many debating the topic on Internet forums.
But in a break with that tradition, Tom Weir, the company’s vice president and general manager, responded to e-mailed questions.
“EEStor’s technology has the opportunity to touch every aspect of daily life from very big to very small devices,” Mr. Weir writes. “We also see a whole new generation of products … based around our technology.”
Added credibility arrived with the January announcement by Lockheed Martin, the big defense company, of an agreement to use EEStor technology for military and homeland security applications. It refers to the EEStor “ceramic battery” providing “10 times the energy density of lead-acid batteries at 1/10th the weight and volume.”
In 2005, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers sunk $3 million into EEStor. ZENN also invested $3 million and will get exclusive rights to retrofit vehicles with the system – and produce new mid-size cars using EESUs.
According to EEStor’s patent application, the breakthrough is based on a technically arduous process of purifying and fabricating units with barium titanate, a material known to retain vast amounts of power.
“The main feature of the EESU is the charge and dis-charge at electric speed,” Weir writes. “This is a key enabling factor for the advancement of the next generation of vehicles. Another feature is the amount of power the EESU can store. Lastly, the EESU is expected to be considered fully ‘green.’ ”
But some bloggers call the purported breakthrough pure hype, today’s version of “cold fusion,” the still-theoretical energy source announced in 1989.
At least some analysts and researchers, though skeptical, seem reluctant to dismiss entirely the possibility that EEStor could be onto something significant.
“I’m sure they do have a technology, but skepticism revolves around the fact that nobody knows much about it,” says Anu Cherian, an analyst who tracks the $100 million global ultracapacitor market for Frost & Sullivan, a growth consulting company. “The ZENN car looks to be an exciting development. But there’s a lot of hype in the market.”
Other ultracapacitor experts won’t dismiss EEStor’s claim despite technical challenges.
“It would be unfair to make an analogy between what EEStor is doing and cold fusion,” says Joel Schindall, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor who is using nanotechnology to improve ultracapacitors. “I don’t doubt that they have built a device on a small scale that does store the amounts of energy they are talking about. I just don’t know if they can manage the process of scaling it up … for commercial applications.”
Dr. Schindall and his colleagues hope soon to demonstrate a fivefold boost in ultracapacitor energy storage to up to 25 percent of the energy storage capacity of a lithium battery – and someday up to 50 percent – using a different approach to the problem.
Such significant advances would make ultracapacitors viable in vehicles, though they still fall far short of Clifford’s claims about EESU.
Making commercial quantities of EESUs could prove challenging since even tiny impurities and defects in manufacturing could result in “a violent discharge,” Schindall notes.
Safety is a huge issue for energy storage in vehicles whether powered by gasoline, ethanol, hydrogen, batteries – or ultracapacitors. High-capacity lithium-ion battery research for cars, for instance, is focused on ensuring those devices don’t burst into flames. EEStor has ensured that its new ultracapacitor will be safe if damaged in a crash by “instantly discharging to ground,” Clifford says.
Skeptics don’t bother him, he says, because “we’ve seen this product with our own eyes.”
“We’ve had a great 100-year run with petroleum,” Clifford says. “But the time has come for all of us to come to our senses now and realize that the electric-powered era for cars has finally arrived.”
Comments from EEStor
Much of the rampant skepticism on the Internet over whether or not EEStor has had a breakthrough in automotive propulsion stems from the company’s reticence to speak or to demonstrate its product publicly. Only a handful of press releases have been issued since the company was formed, and press reports have rarely included any direct quotes from company managers. Below are comments from a Monitor e-mail interview with Tom Weir, vice president and general manager, EEStor, Inc.
Can you offer an idea of what your product could do for automotive transportation and a time horizon for development?
“We see our Electrical Energy Storage Unit, ‘EESU,’ enabling the next generation of electric vehicles. The main feature of the EESU is [its ability to] charge and dis-charge at electric speed. This is a key enabling factor for the advancement of the next generation of vehicles. Another feature is the amount of power the EESU can store. Lastly, the EESU is expected to be considered fully ‘green.’ ”
Some have suggested that ultracapacitors will play more of a supporting role – others that it’s a “game changer,” or even world changing. How would you describe the potential?
“EEStor’s technology has the opportunity to touch every aspect of daily life from very big to very small devices. We also see a whole new generation of products and services that [are] based around our technology.”
How would you characterize EEStor’s contribution to developing new systems to transmit the energy for automotive propulsion?
“No comment.”
EEStor has announced passing an evaluation on purity of its production process. Explain why this is important.
“To be discussed in the near future.”
Why has EEStor been so quiet, some say secretive, about what it is doing?
“We talk about our achievements through press releases. We talk with our current customers almost daily. We will also talk about more things when the time is right.”
Do you see any show stoppers, or is it just a matter of ramping up?
“With any start-up you have some speed bumps that come up from time to time. We have no show stoppers.”
Competitors rev their engines
At the North American International Auto Show in January, AFS Trinity created a stir by strutting its “extreme hybrid” plug-in concept vehicle that uses ultracapacitors to boost battery life and get 150 miles per gallon. The Bellevue, Wash.-based company sees ultracapacitors as a natural fit with new generation lithium-ion batteries that are vital to plug-in hybrids. Company chairman Edward Furia compares batteries to a long-distance runner (providing the stamina a car needs over the long haul) while ultracapacitors are akin to a weight lifter – giving cars that 0-to-60 oomph while minimizing impact on the delicate battery.
As oil prices rise, new ultracapacitor research has emerged. Companies like Maxwell Technologies, Panasonic, Nippon Chemi-Con, and others are working on advanced devices with attributes of both an ultracapacitor and a battery, according to a November report from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). But the recent focus is only a continuation of a long-term fascination with ultracapacitors in automobiles.
A small fleet of ultracapacitor-powered buses began running in Moscow in 1995, and some garbage trucks in the US now use ultracapacitors to efficiently absorb energy from braking – and discharge it for acceleration, the IEEE article notes. Honda’s Dualnote concept car in 2002 also showed off ultracapacitors’ ability to instantly absorb braking energy and then return it in acceleration. German automaker BMW is also said to be evaluating ultracapacitors in their hybrid vehicles.
( More stories )
Comments
2. vanderbilt | 06.10.08
Aren’t we all just exasperated to keep reading stuff like this and not see any remote chance of this coming out in the next year? Look folks, we need this stuff NOW, not later. How long will we have to go before the car makers cave in and actually get serious about this? Ten dollars a gallon? Twelve? What is the breaking point? Or would the car makers rather just give up and file bankruptcy?
3. Ray NL | 06.10.08
That’s funny: the ‘car’ in the picture is actually a Microcar MC-1 or MC2, i have one but with a diesel engine. It’s a two seater and official status here is a ‘4 wheeled roofed moped’. It does 30 kilometers per liter diesel (about 135 miles per gallon) but (here) it may only do 45 kmph (30 mph) although the first uncapped models did 80-90kmph.
I’d like my car to have an electric engine instead, especially if it can be charged in 5 minutes (heck, i’d like all my electronic equipment to be charged in 5 minutes!).
Would also be great if they implemented a solar panel on top or somewhere, even if it only charges the capacitor even marginally..
It is an exciting era to live in, i hope i will be able to see those developments in real action!
Thanks for the article ![]()
4. fauxscot | 06.10.08
I used ultracaps in a vehicle engine startup voltage sag filter a few years ago. Got the units from an outfit called Maxwell Technologies and fell in love with them. (I was using a 15volt stack of 340 F / 2.5V caps that netted me 58 F.)
Using these things presented some interesting challenges. One was that when I charged a fully discharged cap, it obviously too some serious current, and for one helluva long time. The impact was mostly on connectors and wiring, which had to be sized so that it did not melt. There’s a tradeoff of charging time versus circuit sizing versus circuit complexity to deal with when putting a lot of energy into one of these things in as short a time as possible.
The point is… there were many unforseen implications of a shift from a battery to a cap. I read about EEStor a few years ago, and they claimed to have drastically improved the volumetric efficiency of the caps, which was dismal compared to a battery. It IS promising technology, if they can pull it off. They are also right to be circumspect about releasing info on it. Engineers don’t fully appreciate the challenges, and you can bet lay people wouldn’t either.
I also used to work at Lockheed Martin (when it was Martin Marietta). If they gave their gold stamp of approval, I am highly inclined to believe them. Remember, they put two Viking landers on the surface of Mars in the 1970’s. The design life was 30-60 days. One lasted 5 or 6 years and the other about 8 or 9, as I recall.
Go EEstor. I hope you are on to something big.
6. Jeff | 06.10.08
Let’s just say “snake oil” until I can sit down and do the math.
Regardless of what the conspiracy theorists say, there are no 150mpg carburetors sitting in safes at GM or being suppressed by secret agents in the employ of Ford. The first company to get a really practical (fast charging, practical range, reasonable load-carrying capacity, low maintenance, safe and unsubsidized [read battery pack replacement]) electric or alternate-energy-source vehicle in the showrooms will make a killing. Everyone in the automotive industry knows that — the race is on, folks.
The person who asked “How long will we have to go before the car makers cave in and actually get serious about this?” has no concept of how much action there is on this front at the moment and not the faintest idea how long it takes and how much it costs to get a mass-market automobile into production.
There is no magic bullet. E85 is just a smokescreen and an entitlement program for midwestern corn farmers. Hydrogen is unsafe. Look to hydraulic hybrids for at least part of the solution.
7. web design company | 06.10.08
Awesome, another concept that excites everybody until it slowly fades into the realm of overzealous claims. Can we stop submitting stories about the ‘next best car’ until any of these articles have some damn facts and sources to back them up?
8. rick | 07.02.08
my bs meter goes off anytime a company acts like estor. My bet, they are bluffing and just buying zapp stock to make some quick cash.
Look at this story 2 years from now and see if anything came of it.
9. Zehaas Sram | 07.23.08
As an analyst in the field of alternative energy, I see no insurmountable problems with implementing the device as stated in the patent. The question isn’t IF they can do it, the question is WHEN. I believe they can do it, and I think it will take longer than originally anticipated.
I am excited about the prospects for use Plug-in electric cars (PEVs) and Photovoltaic (PV) systems. Nanosolar has a new PV cell which is printed on aluminum foil, just like with an ink-jet printer. It will be ten times cheaper per watt than we have now. Imaging the marriage of that technology for generating with this technology for storage. It would finally make PV systems the thing to do, instead of the grid.
– Zehaas Sram
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate – even pointed disagreement – is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.




1. heyzeus | 06.10.08
“Autovation”? Please report to your nearest bridge for gene pool removal.