Mollusks on the ocean floor. (NEWSCOM)
New sea change forecasts present a slimy picture
Column: Overfishing, a potential mollusk invasion, and the rise of slime threaten ocean ecology.
By Robert C. Cowen | Columnist for The Christian Science Monitor/ August 20, 2008 edition
Science columnist Robert Cowen discusses how algae at one of Beijing’s Olympic venues could portend environmental trouble.
Columnist Robert Cowen
Earth’s oceans are on the brink of massive change. You see it in such details as the hordes of Pacific mollusks that researchers have identified as ready to invade the North Atlantic as a thawing Arctic Ocean opens the way. You also see it in broad trends: A new overview warns that such relentless human impacts as overfishing or agricultural pollution – as well as global warming – threaten mass extinctions of marine life.
Jeremy Jackson at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who made that overview, notes that this is “not a happy picture.”
He says that “the only way to keep one’s sanity and try to achieve real success is to carve out sectors of the problem that can be addressed in effective terms and get on with it as quickly as possible.”
For example, policymakers and governments can work aggressively to get international agreement on sustainable fishing practices that really work. They can vigorously pursue development and implementation of nonpolluting farming.
Change is a way of life in the ocean. It’s been going on since the planet formed. Even the potential mollusk invasion has a long history. Geerat Vermeij with the University of California at Davis and Peter Roopnarine at the California Academy of Sciences traced that history in last week’s issue of the journal Science. Pacific Ocean mollusks were invading the North Atlantic during a relatively warm period 3.5 million years ago. The scientists note that computer-based climate forecasts expect similar conditions to return by 2050 with a nearly ice-free Arctic Ocean.
Millions of years ago, abundant food and stiff competition in the Bering and Chuckchi Seas developed a population of shellfish bigger and tougher than Atlantic animals. These tough guys rode a northward water flow across the ice-free North Pole into the Atlantic. The researchers now have identified at least 77 lineages of equally rugged shallow-water shellfish in the Bering Sea that are ready to make that trip again. They explain that the earlier invasion led to new North Atlantic species but did not cause significant extinctions. They say that a new invasion will also change the makeup of North Atlantic communities. They add: “But whether that will harm local fisheries is an open question. Humans may have to adapt as well.”
Millions of years ago, only nature was at work. Now the human impacts Professor Jackson reviewed last week in the online Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences have become a wild card in the game. Jackson explains that mass extinction does not mean loss of all ocean life.
But key elements of long established healthy food webs such as fish and sharks are disappearing. He warns that intricate food webs that feature large animals are being converted into simplistic ecosystems dominated by microbes, toxic algal blooms, jellyfish, and disease. It’s what the Scripps’ announcement of this research calls the “rise of slime.”
Jackson identifies coral reefs and estuaries and coastal seas that suffer from overfishing and farm runoff as “critically endangered.” Saving these critically endangered ecosystems would be a good place to start the long-term efforts to save the entire ocean from man-made devastation.
( More stories )
Comments
2. Goddessence | 08.22.08
Vegetarianism is not only an environmental advantage but also safer in our toxic age
3. Ron Scheurer | 08.22.08
The biggest contribution humans can make to solving the earth’s ecological problems is to reproduce less. A billion people might be sensibly sustainable; not 6.5 billion and rising. You cannot blame mollusks and jelly fish poop for the increasingly slimy oceans. It’s humans that are turning it into a cesspool.
4. Ciceroji | 08.22.08
Intestesting article. However, I wonder why noone is talking about the potential release of massive quantites of methane from the ocean floor as the earth gets warmer. If you look up methane, it is not by itself poisonous but leads to asphyxiation when it reaches a certain percetage in the air. I think we should be worrying about mass extintion of human beings.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.





1. Scott | 08.20.08
We, as individuals, can stop contributing to all three malignant processes; overfishing, agricultural pollution, and unnecessary GHG production by becoming a moderate vegetarian.
This does not mean becoming a hardcore vegan, it merely means limiting our meat intake to special occasions and reducing egg and dairy consumption to lower levels.
An isocaloric serving of beef consumes 16 times as much fossil fuel energy as does a vegetarian equivalent.
Likewise, the average U.S. diet of 8 oz. meat daily produces a per capita production of 3 tons of livestock waste, much of which ends up as freshwater runoff and ultimately ends up in the oceans.