Courtesy of The General Theological Seminary
General Seminary staff members and technical consultants smile for the moment on August 8, 2007 when drilling began for the wells required for the school's geothermal heating and cooling system.
Geothermal heating in action
By Gregory M. Lamb | 12.31.08
At the General Theological Seminary in New York City, thoughts, if not eyes, are meant to be cast heavenward. But the oldest Episcopal seminary in the United States also is looking deep underground for a way to heat and cool its buildings.
Earlier this year seven wells were completed that drilled into schist rock formation hundreds of feet below Manhattan island to tap an underground river that flows at a constant 65-degree temperature year round. By circulating that water to the surface, several of the seminary’s handsome 19th-century buildings are being cooled in summer and heated in winter. When the project is completed, 20 such wells will heat and cool the entire campus.
While large, intensely hot geothermal sites can be used to generate electricity (see main story), even the relatively small differences in water temperature below ground can be used as heating and cooling sources. Such geothermal heat pump projects are springing up nationwide as alternatives to burning oil and gas, from private residences to public buildings such as a fire station in Iowa City, Iowa, and a veteran’s home in Burlington, Vt.
The geothermal heat pumps at the New York seminary were in part an aesthetic decision, eliminating the need to put cooling towers on the historic Victorian roofs or in middle of the peaceful courtyard garden. But being a better steward of the earth by cutting use of fossil fuels was the overriding motivation, says Maureen Burnley, the seminary’s executive vice-president for finance and operations.
“The stewardship issue, I think, is what tipped us over the edge,” she says. “It was an opportunity for us to make a pretty powerful statement … to take a stand for green technology.”
Obtaining permits from the city to drill the wells, and satisfying neighbors that no harm would be done to them, slowed the project and brought some soul-searching, Ms. Burnley says. “This was new territory for us, and we came very quickly to learn that it was new territory for the city [too]. We were very much a test case.”
The project has cost $9 million so far and is projected to cost nearly $20 million at completion. The break-even period will depend on the future price of the heating oil that the seminary won’t have to burn, probably seven to 14 years. Once all the wells are online, the seminary will save about 1,400 tons of climate-warming carbon emissions each year.
“If you believe in the long term, and we do, this [decision] is a no-brainer. If you don’t believe in the long term, you probably shouldn’t be in our line of work,” Burnley says with a chuckle.
The seminary regularly receives calls from schools and churches asking about the project. “We’ve all got to get going on this stuff,” she says.
<< Holding on to 2008 for just one second more | MainComments
2. Theos Rakone | 01.02.09
Very great idea to use the free heat from the ground.
The impact of this drilling is not fully understood jet, but could be less destructive than using above-ground technologies.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. Jerry Brown | 01.02.09
I would like to see the limits of ground source heat. At what point is it uneconomical? I live in an area where ground temperatures range from 32 degree to 45 degrees and ambient temperatures from +90F and -50F. could the correct use of the heat transfer liquid and a heat pump provide an economical and effecient solution. Also can we store heat by transferring summer heat and cooling into the ground to supplement winter heating.