As GPS merges with cell phones, the ability to meet up with new “friends” online becomes much easier. But it is fraught with security concerns.
(Newscom)Photos (1 of 1)
Cellphone tracking services: Friend finder or Big Brother?
Mobile location tracking lets you see where your friends are. But what about privacy?
By Michael B. Farrell | Staff Writer for The Christian Science Monitor/ May 1, 2009 edition
Reporter Michael Farrell discusses the pros and cons of cell phones with GPS tracking capabilities.
Reporter Michael Farrell
San Francisco
Where r u? That text message, says Sam Altman, was so common that he wanted to find a way to answer it – for everyone.
As a sophomore in computer science at Stanford University, Mr. Altman imagined a way that mobile phone users could seamlessly check their friends’ whereabouts with location-tracking technology. But back in 2005, global positioning system (GPS) hadn’t arrived in smart phones.
Technology soon caught up with the idea. Today his company, Loopt, has more than 1 million users and is one of the most popular services to allow people to track their friends via their smart phones. And with more cellphones now equipped with GPS, other services such as Google Latitude are collecting location data from scores of users and broadcasting that information through phone networks or the Internet.
Such tracking services offer a great way for people stay connected – and can be a boon for parents – but their proliferation also has privacy advocates biting their nails. As companies forge into largely uncharted areas of tracking and recording customer locations, many worry that consumers won’t be able to ensure that their private information – such as their whereabouts on a given day – is being safeguarded, especially from advertisers.
“How are we going to get all the benefits that come from doing geo-location without sacrificing people’s privacy?” asks Lauren Gelman, executive director of Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society (CIS).
Ms. Gelman and other privacy experts caution that when users allow companies to track their locations, third parties – such as the government, litigants, and advertisers – can potentially tap into that data. “If you have the information, someone is going to come asking for it.”
In other words, could your iPhone or BlackBerry be used to spy on you? Will your spouse or employer know where you are even when you don’t want them to?
Who’s in the Loopt?
As Loopt and Google are moving forward in the realm of geosocial or mobile social networking, companies such as NearbyNow and Placecast are exploring ways that advertisers could potentially exploit growing databases of location-specific information (imagine, for instance, getting a coupon for pizza on your mobile phone after walking by a pizzeria).
Altman stresses that Loopt puts a premium on customer privacy and doesn’t sell the information to advertisers. It does, however, post ads on its service based on location. Its privacy policy states: “Loopt discloses some personally identifiable, registration, profile, or location information to subsidiaries, affiliated companies, or other businesses or persons for the purpose of providing certain features of the Loopt Services, in order to serve relevant advertisements in support of the Loopt Services, and for processing such information on our behalf.”
When it comes to safety, Loopt gives users control over when to reveal their location and who gets to see it. It also gives them the ability to alter or remove it at any time. While Loopt is built to let people meet up with friends who happen to be nearby, it has a public option in which users reveal their location to a broader group.
The intent of this option, called Loopt Mix, is to allow users to meet other service subscribers in real life.
Loopt advises caution when using this feature: “When meeting up with another Mix user, always meet in a public space with people around. Bring a friend or at least let a friend know where you’re going.”
What happens if the service is abused? Altman says the community of Loopt users has proven to be a reliable watchdog. Several users suspected of illicit activity have been reported and kicked off the service, he says.
Services that keep tabs on your every move do seem a bit “creepy,” admits Ryan Calo, a residential fellow at CIS and an expert on electronic privacy issues. But, he says, while they could potentially lead to some criminal wrongdoing, he doesn’t think “location based services are going to play into that dynamic…. [I]n the bulk of cases, this tool is going to be used by people who already have a relationship to augment that relationship.”
Some tracking services, for example, allow family members keep track of each other or parents to keep an eye on their children.
Much of what’s driving the growth of mobile social networking or geo-locating services, says Mr. Calo, is the fact that “location data is really salient. It really matters to an individual to find things around them and really matters to advertisers to connect with people.”
Laws lag behind
Congress is taking interest in the growth in mobile tracking – and the growth in all sorts of data tracking that’s happening online – and what it means for consumer privacy. At a hearing on communication networks and consumer privacy last week, Loopt chief operating officer Brian Knapp was asked whether the federal government should begin regulating how companies use the private data collected by internet service providers and other companies that gather location information.
“A high-level privacy framework that sticks by tried-and-true principles would be beneficial,” Mr. Knapp told the House panel. But he added that he had concerns that laws could also get “focused on a snapshot in a moment in time and may get outdated.”
“The laws are always years behind technology, says Paul Stephens, director of policy and advocacy at the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. “These location-tracking services have been available since about 2005 and the laws haven’t caught up with the technology.”
The most important thing, he says, is for new users to be fully informed of the potential consequences when they opt for mobile tracking services. But, “typically they aren’t.”
( More stories )
Comments
2. Claudio | 05.04.09
As I wrote back in January in my BLOG, I believe this is the paradox of social networks in general and those based on location in particular. I want to make my information public but at the same time I want to keep the information secured (actually not the information but myself).
Looking over the other side of the table, the value of a social network resides on the information you provide. The lack of privacy is one of the pillars that sustain the business models of many, if not all, social networks. When privacy issues are raised, we usually ask what the companies are doing to protect their customers. Expecting the companies to protect your privacy is like expecting the cat to safeguard the cream; this is the fuel for their business. It’s not the companies that need to protect the information, rather YOU the customer.
You can read the full post “Location Based Social Networks - Is Privacy Overrated? Rules for a New World” at http://bdnooz.com/2009/01/20/location-based-social-networks-is-privacy-overrated/
3. caarlitosvodka@gmail.com | 05.10.09
perfect mobility and perfect information are required of a prefectly competitive market which can considerably bring down prices of all good in the world but the price we have to pay considering psychological costs and benefits, we are not ready yet to face due to ethical and social reasons.
being used in a capitalist system people will have companies a being big brother and easily on non established middle and lower class using the law, how this translates to us is that we have no time at all to mosey around and the company may know if we are lying this violates isms standards.
if used inappropriately can cause severe security issues and may prove very helpful. this bandwagon is a bane and boon and cannot be left alone, somebody will definitely benefit from this, highly likely not the first one to try in big scale due to the initial risks. this will solidify societies perception about perfect mobility and nformation and then the secondaries will improve on the idea and will eventually win the bandwagon over to his side. this is inevitable and somebody will definitely benefit and regret this concept monetarily.
people initally interested can usually cause a danger which is why this was created in the first place, no place for trust and blood will be shed easier. specially if there are no restrictions on the
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. Henry | 05.01.09
The potential of location-based services is far too great to be written off as merely a dangerous fad. We stand on the threshold of a whole new generation of services able to serve up hyper-contextualized and highly tailored content and recommendations in large part based on the awareness of location.
Concerns of privacy and safety almost always arise in fervent opposition to any new social technology or service highly reliant upon user data. Take social networking for example. Certainly these concerns have some foundation. Both MySpace and Facebook have shown up in their fair share of regrettable headlines. Any medium that enables users to broadcast intimate details of their lives holds the potential for exploitation.
It comes down to responsible use and intelligent choices by “we” the consumer. Of course, it should be expected that any location-based service worthy of our attention ought to provide an ethical, straightforward privacy policy and rich privacy options and settings for protecting our informaiton.
At a minimum, location sharing should be allowed only on an opt-in basis-that is, two users must establish a “relationship” before any information is shared between them. The service should further enable users to safeguard their privacy by providing for the management of when, how much and with whom to share their information once a relationship is established. Perhaps you share your location to the street address with your mother, but only to the city level or not at all with a co-worker. Ultimately, however, it is incumbent upon the user to make wise, “safe” decisions when choosing to share personal data.
In summary, good old-fashioned commonsense combined with strong service based privacy settings ought to provide for a safe and enjoyable user experience, while paving the way for the next evolution of personalization through the use of highly contextual information including location.