A man uses a computer at an Internet cafe in Fuyang, central China's Anhui province. China wants all personal computers sold domestically to come with software that blocks access to online pornography, which it has banned, the main developer of the software said.
(AP/File)Photos (1 of 1)
China’s censorship software found faulty
University of Michigan team finds ‘major security vulnerabilities,’ even as mandate to install the program sparks fury.
By Peter Ford | Staff Writer for The Christian Science Monitor/ June 12, 2009 edition
Staff Writer Peter Ford explains why new measures by the Chinese government to control information on the Internet may endanger the country's computer security.
Reporter Peter Ford
Beijing
As the Chinese government banned public criticism of its controversial new requirement that all computers sold in China carry censorship software, the plan came under new fire from an unexpected quarter Friday.
A team of computer engineers at the University of Michigan warned that the program, due to be installed on all new computers here by the end of this month, “will significantly weaken China’s computer security” because of faulty programming.
The policy, communicated quietly last month to computer manufacturers but published only this week, had already drawn fierce international and domestic criticism from free-speech advocates.
Officials have presented the Chinese-made program “Green Dam-Youth Escort” as a way of protecting children from pornography by blocking computer access to websites that appear on an automatically updated blacklist for offering “harmful information.”
Critics say it could too easily be used by the authorities to deny access to any site they found politically undesirable.
“Pornography is one concern, but their main target is political and other sensitive information,” charges Li Fangping, a civil rights lawyer who has filed a request under China’s Open Government regulations for a public hearing into the decision to impose “Green Dam-Youth Escort.”
Such fears seem to be justified by the lists of banned words that would trigger the software that the University of Michigan team, which tested it on its own initiative, decrypted: They include both sexual and political references, especially to the outlawed Falun Gong spiritual sect.
The US experts’ report also said they had found “two major security vulnerabilities” that “allow remote parties to execute arbitrary code and take control of the computer” running the software. They recommended that anyone already running the program should “remove the software immediately.”
Supportive comments (only) allowed
Meanwhile the ruling Communist Party’s propaganda department ordered all media to “focus on supportive comments” about the Green Dam software, and “not print doubts or criticism,” according to a June 10 edict that has leaked onto the Chinese Internet.
The order came in the wake of several days of fierce debate, both in the official media and in Internet chat rooms, over the dangers of the program.
Its makers, Jinhui, boast on their website that Green Dam offers “real-time screen captures, detailed Internet usage records for post-facto monitoring,” and a tool to disable proxy servers, which many Chinese Internauts use to get around the “great firewall” and into sensitive political sites that would otherwise be blocked by existing filters.
China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology ordered on May 19 that all computers sold in China from July 1 must have the Green Dam-Youth Escort program “pre-installed,” though ambiguous wording in the directive has suggested to some that it could be sold as an accompanying CD-Rom.
The manufacturers insist that users are free to turn off or uninstall the software, though users of the free downloadable version currently available say it cannot be uninstalled simply from a computer’s control panel.
US manufacturers in a quandary
US computer manufacturers, caught between breaking the law in the second-largest market in the world and assisting censorship, have called on Beijing to “reconsider implementing its new mandatory filtering software requirement.”
In a statement earlier this week, four US technology industry associations said they hoped for “open and healthy dialogue on how parental control software can be offered in the market in ways that ensure privacy, system reliability, freedom of expression, the free flow of information, security, and user choice.”
( More stories )
Comments
2. Rick | 06.13.09
Wow, the staements from Christian Science Monitor below of what can or cannot be posted here and much of its Terms of Service is not too much unlike this story of China’s Censorship. Ironic.
4. chrys thorsen | 06.13.09
In the end, the almighty dollar will win. Manufacturers will not give up the second largest market for ideology. Just as Google prostituted itself by putting filters in place for the Chinese govt, computer manufacturers will quietly acquiesce to demands to keep up sales.
5. Malc Dow | 06.16.09
Rick’s comment is a) quite right and b) presents the ‘problem’ well.
“…the statements from Christian Science Monitor below of what can or cannot be posted here and much of its Terms of Service is not too much unlike this story of China’s Censorship. Ironic.”
What is China after all, than a larger version of the C.Monitor!
If one can understand C.M. not wishing to present their readers with, as regarded by the editorial, as offensive for what ever reason, why is it an affront that China does the same?
Could it be that one is not forced to read the C.M., while perhaps the same cannot be said of China.
6. Andrew W. Bilinski | 06.16.09
To those commenting on the limits imposed by CSM: Are you for real? The substantive limitations that I see are as follows.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
The purpose behind sponsoring a commentary feature is to encourage people to offer their opinions. A purpose which your own postings seem to fulfill. The PRC purpose sounds like it is trying to control and effectively block any negative commentary and to otherwise control what is allowed to be published. Given that these folks are the same ones that gave us the show “Tiananmen Square” with armored vehicles playing tag with un-armored humans, I have to wonder how well you would fare if you were living in mainland China … or perhaps you are?
Funny. Mao pushed a program “Let a thousand flowers bloom” and used it to identify and purge those who did not think like him. Sounds pretty close to the mark.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
2. Friday’s coverage agenda: Iran votes, China censors, Security Council meets | csmonitor.com | 06.12.09
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.






1. Matt | 06.13.09
well .. we’re all crazy to think similar software is not already installed on every computer anyway. even if not, there are certainly ways to seize a computer or if anything “shut it down” remotely. the software is just a guise to make it look like you have a choice.