Discoveries Blog Horizons Blog

(KRT)

Photos (1 of 1)

Taking aim at energy-sucking TVs

EPA sets new guidelines for efficiency that will rise through 2012.

By Chris Gaylord  |  Staff writer/ October 5, 2009 edition


Enlarge This Graphic

Rich Clabaugh/Staff

Television’s high-definition era has done an impressive job of bringing theaterlike experiences to the not-so-small screen. New tube TVs are hard to come by these days, as stores make room for flat-panel models measuring 50 inches or more.

But it takes a lot of energy to power those millions of pixels – enough that the US Environmental Protection Agency suggested in September that perhaps there is such a thing as a television that’s too big.

As picture quality improves, television sets are sucking down an increasing share of home-energy costs. America’s TVs consume “4 percent of all households’ electricity use,” reports the federal energy-efficiency program, Energy Star. “This is enough electricity to power all the homes in the state of New York for an entire year.”

Three things contribute to televisions’ growing appetite: technology, size, and brightness.

Plasma TVs in particular crave a disproportionate energy appetite, placing them close to refrigerators in terms of monthly energy use. An average 50-inch plasma TV, lauded for its top-notch colors and image contrast, guzzles 375 watts of power, according to Energy Star. A similarly sized LCD set wants just half that – 180 watts. (LED-lit LCD sets, still relatively new and high priced, use even less.)

If you think in terms of energy used per inch, tube TVs aren’t that much more efficient than LCDs. However, tubes rarely outgrew 32 inches. Many electronics stores now stick LCDs that size in the “small television” section.

Concerned about the rapid growth in screen sizes, Energy Star started pushing back. The program tracks and certifies efficient home appliances. Most TVs currently meet its standard for energy use, although conforming to it is not required by law.

In September, Energy Star unveiled its guidelines for 2010. Starting next May, TVs will need to be 40 percent more efficient than today’s standard to receive Energy Star certification. By May 2012, the bar rises to 65 percent.

The new rule will be particularly strict on TVs larger than 50 inches – suggesting that Americans really don’t need a plus-sized TV set.

The EPA, which helps run Energy Star, will put in place “a requirement that TVs greater than 50 inches in size meet the same On Mode requirements as a screen of 50 inches – 108 watts,” said the EPA’s Katharine Kaplan in announcing the new benchmarks.

The agency considered disqualifying all TVs that were larger than 50 inches – sending a stronger message about their excesses. But Kaplan explains that the EPA didn’t want to needlessly exclude innovative companies that could engineer enormous yet efficient models.

For example, CNET’s TV reviewers found a 50-inch Vizio plasma that sucks down 474 watts and a 50-inch Panasonic that sips just 163 watts.

Regardless of the size or technology of your TV, brightness can significantly sway its energy diet. If you’re concerned about your energy bill, consider dialing down the television’s settings. Even a slightly dimmer picture can ease your TV’s thirst.

( More stories )

Comments

1. Byron Stuckey | 10.05.09

It would be really helpful if articles such as this would provide adequate information for the reader to evaluate his/her own circumstances. No mention is made of rear projection TVs or DLP technology TVs. Where do they fit in the scheme of things? Are Mitsubishis and Hitachis the same as Panasonics and Zeniths?

2. Wai Yip Tung | 10.05.09

Remember the transition from the CRT era? One of the advantage of LCD is its lower energy consumption. Somehow people always manage to spend all the saving and then more.

3. Jim Palumbo | 10.06.09

Reviewing the EPA web site, 50″ plasma HDTVs on-mode power begin at 155w to the highest performance models in the mid 200w. This is substantially below the 375w indicated in the article. At 155w, one can replace a 35/36″ Sony analog tube using 295w, for example, with a 50″ HDTV and reduce energy consumption by half.

4. Alex | 10.07.09

Of course one thing we can all do to help reduce the amount of energy our TVs use is switch the thing off properly, that is at the wall socket, when we are not using it. Leaving it on standby with the remote switch still means it’s sucking up to 90% of it’s on power load. Invest in a power strip with a switch and put the home entertainment system on it (except the cable/satellite box as that often updates at night) then just click and zero watts!

Reducing the brightness from the shop set level also helps prevent the screen burning out too fast and I find it prevents headaches. Shops always set the brightness way too high to attract your attention. Try using the various settings that come the TV, such as movie, sports etc or just bring the brightness down to mid point or below. Trust me after a few days you’ll not even notice but your wallet will.

5. Don | 10.07.09

Keep your old tv and get the converter box and antenna. The picture is fine.

Get a TV card for your pc and use your existing monitor for the houshold TV.

I do both.

6. Tara | 10.08.09

Once again, thank you to the great Nation-State of California for this initiative, and thank you to Obama for freeing the EPA to catch up to what private industry and the states have been doing for years: implementing solutions.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.