Olympic Glory Blog

China tightens grip on protesters

‘Protest pens’ have been empty. Those who have sought permission to demonstrate have been detained or harassed.

Peter Ford | Staff writer / August 18, 2008 edition

Marianne Barriaux/AFP/Getty Images/Newscom

Confronted by police: Mr. Hai (l.) handed a placard to his son during a mini-protest at a park in Beijing last week.


Beijing

Mr. Hai is the only Chinese citizen to have successfully staged a protest in Beijing during the current Olympic Games, but it only lasted a minute or two before he and his family were swamped by plainclothes policemen.

And he only got that far because he had not bothered to ask for official permission to demonstrate, “so nobody knew we were going” to Ritan Park in the center of the city, said Hai, who asked that his full name not be used for fear of more retribution.

Ritan Park houses one of three “protest pens” that the Chinese authorities have set aside for demonstrations by foreigners or Chinese citizens during the Games, suggesting that this offers a chance for the free speech they had promised for the Olympics.

One week into the event, however, none of the sites has seen a single officially approved demonstration, and several protest applicants have been jailed, detained, expelled from the capital, or harassed.

The sites’ designation was “one step further to open up and I think it’s a very good gesture” said Wang Wei, vice president of the Beijing Games organizing committee, last week.

The fact that nobody has been allowed to use them, however, and that some people have been punished for trying, “is a step back” says Sara Davis, founder of Asia Catalyst, a US nonprofit that supports human rights activists in Asia. “It is a sad moment and quite disheartening.”

Police spokesmen have refused to say how many applications for protests they have received. Chinese law requires potential protesters to apply five days in advance for permission.

Hai did not do that, he explained, because “I was not protesting against the government or the country.”

His goal, he said, was to draw attention to the way local authorities in his home town of Huiming, in Shandong Province, have refused to compensate his family for confiscating his house.

The morning after the Games’ opening ceremony, Hai and his family went to Ritan Park and raised a cardboard sign. Almost immediately he was set upon by about 20 plainclothes policemen, he said. Only the presence of two foreign reporters, who accompanied him to a taxi, saved him from arrest, he added.

Three days later, however, Hai’s aged mother was questioned for several hours at a police station, and, since then, carloads of plainclothes police have been parked outside his home and his mother’s home, preventing them from leaving.

Other would-be protesters have been treated more harshly. Zhang Wei, who has often protested the destruction of her Beijing home in a redevelopment project, was taken from her home a few days after applying for a protest permit.

She later joined some of her former neighbors at a protest near her old home, and the police have informed her family that she is serving a 30-day sentence for “disturbing the social order,” according to her sister. “As ordinary people we don’t have any rights,” she added. “We are not allowed to file a lawsuit or to sue the government. We can only suffer.”

Tang Xuefen, who applied for a permit on Aug. 5 to protest local corruption in his home province of Henan, has disappeared, and a friend of his, Ji Sizun, a legal activist from Fujian, was last seen being put into an unmarked Buick by plainclothes policemen after going to a Beijing police station to enquire about the status of his own request on Aug. 11, according to a report by Human Rights Watch.

Other complainants have simply been expelled from Beijing.

Ge Yifei, representing property owners in the southern city of Suzhou who are in dispute with the company that built their homes, registered a protest request on Aug. 1.

While she was still in the police station, she says, four Suzhou policemen who had apparently followed her to Beijing burst in and forced her to go with them. The next day she was forcibly escorted back to Suzhou by train.

A similar fate befell Zhang Dongfang, a leader of a small nationalist group defending China’s rights to the Diaoyu chain of islands, currently occupied by Japan.

After another member of his group enquired about the regulations for holding protests, Mr. Zhang said, “the Hunan police called” from his home province. “They forced me to come back and made it clear it had to do with the Olympics,” he explained.

“They said they had received a call from the Beijing Public Security Bureau,” he added.

No foreign group is known to have applied for official permission to demonstrate. The most visible international activist group here, Students for a Free Tibet, has launched its protests – generally unfurling Tibetan flags or banners demanding Tibetan independence – on streets near the Olympic venues or on Tiananmen Square. The protesters have all been deported.

“We saw the protest pens as a cynical public relations effort, nothing more” says Han Shan, Olympics campaign coordinator for the group. “They are a farce, and the government has been using them essentially as a trap.”

It is unclear whether the designation of the protest parks was ever a serious proposition.

The Beijing police have made no official reference to the proposal since it was first announced last month by Liu Shaowu, head of security for the Olympics’ Chinese organizing committee BOCOG, at a press conference.Nor did the official transcript of Mr. Liu’s comments, carried on BOCOG’s website, contain the names of the three parks that he had specified, suggesting official second thoughts.

Spokesmen for all three of the parks said over the weekend that they had heard nothing from the Beijing police about any plans for demonstrations, and that none had been held.

Zhang Yajun contributed to this story.

( More olympics stories )

Comments

1. Jose | 08.18.08

We, the free world, gave China the helping hand in controlling the Chinese people. We first gave the Chinese government lots of money by purchasing Chinese goods and adopting their girls. We then made it official for them to use Olympics as the excuse to tighten the control.
Shame on us!

2. 董国华(dong guo hua )PRC | 08.19.08

For the sake of safety, isn’t it logical to act like this in such a crucial moment when all people’s safety concerns China the most.
And as to what Jose has said, have we begged you to buy our goods or “adopting girls”? the latter results from the a cheapr price, which allows you to buy more with the same ammount of money; and the latter represent American’s kindness, not what of you has just accused as “Gave Chinese Government lots of money”. It’s a shame to distort your people’s wisdom and kindness, the humanity to say that.

3. 毕海 | 08.19.08

中国公民没有一点实质的人权。农民更是二等公民待遇——准公民(高级奴隶),政府极其严格的操控社会舆情,欺骗、愚弄、摆布、盘剥老百姓。

4. 李达 | 08.19.08

人权不是不知情的人可以随意评价的。有些现象看起来会让人觉得貌似中国人权有问题,但是如果大多数百姓觉得安居乐业没有怨言,这不就是人权了吗?动不动就游行就叫人权了?非常遗憾这样的理解方法…

5. Alan | 08.19.08

I continually find it amazing that our country gives China all benefits, and we deny all benefits to Cuba. Yet both are horribly oppressive communist regimes.

6. 匿名人士 | 08.19.08

to floor 4. 李达 | 08.19.08

bullshit…when people under pressure, they can’t speak what they want, they can’t express what they are thinking, u called this “enjoy living in china, no complaint?”

liar

to floor 4. 李达 | 08.19.08

在政府压力下, 没人敢讲真话,没人敢表达他们的想法,这叫安居乐业,没有怨言吗? 这是政府高压粉饰下的太平… 你不要在这里撒谎了

7. SinoEdwardLonginus | 08.19.08

A: Tibet is not free.
B: How can that be! There must be sth we can do. We shall rescue the Tibetan!
A: Where is Tibet?
B: en…Who cares!
A & B: Free Tibet! Free Tibet!

Even Uncle Sam and his sons free the whole world, there must be and shall be and would be villains for you to oppose. Just like a Chinese old saying “if you want to condemn sb. you can always find out a charge”.

I learn one thing from Uncle Sam, there’s no right or wrong, there’s only haves and havenots; there’s no justice or evil, there’s only strongs and weaks.

After finishing The Origins of Species, everything makes sense.

God Bless America.

8. Alan | 08.19.08

The squelching of public voices conflicts with the open spirit of the Olympics, and I should think that this action will bar China from hosting future Olympics.

9. Love China | 08.21.08

I’m a Chinese,living in China happily.Most of us Chinese people are kind and peace-loving.I think that there is great misunderstanding between China & US. Here I just want to tell the Americans ,more and more progress is being made in human rights,and we Chinese people are living more and more happily.We are proud of our country .and we also expect more communications between the 2 countries. Why can’t we coexist well in the same world. Long live the peace between the 2 countries. May God bless both the 2 countris.

10. Rebekah | 08.22.08

I am the adoptive mother of 3 beautiful children from China. And Jose I do not agree with you our Children, China’s Children are NOT for sale. We did not go in and buy them we paid fee’s to an orphanage who cared for our babies while we could not. I do not feel that your comment was thought out.

11. Paul Andre | 01.24.09

Hello its a very nice site!

==
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulandredevera

12. paul emdek | 03.25.09

What a nice theme

==
http://photoshop.web-elite.com/site.map.php

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

(Websites that are linking to this article)

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate – even pointed disagreement – is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.