Politics
Politics Blog
More photos (1 of 2)

Sen. Barack Obama visited the Western Wall in Jerusalem in July 2008. Polls suggest that Mr. Obama is popular with younger citizens in Israel. (Menahem Kahana/AFP)

Israelis uneasy as US nears vote

John McCain leads Barack Obama by 12 percent in one Israeli poll, a reflection of security concerns.

By Joshua Mitnick  |  Correspondent/ October 27, 2008 edition

Jerusalem and Tel Aviv

Though newspapers and televisions here percolate with news of Sen. Barack Obama’s surge toward the helm of this country’s most important ally, Nir Lev refuses to be swept away.

“I prefer McCain,” says Mr. Lev, a landscaper, while watching soccer at a Jerusalem bar. “But you want to know what it comes down to? We don’t know who [Obama] is.”

While it seems like the world is eager for a victory by Senator Obama, the Democratic contender, many Israelis remain uneasy.

This is a country where a security-first mantra often trumps all other arguments. It’s a nation anxious about an Iranian attack or Hezbollah strike. It’s wary about international involvement in peacemaking with Palestinians and edgy about suicide attacks from Gazan militants.

These are the types of threats that color Israelis’ worldviews and influence the type of American president they want: someone who will take a hard line when confronting any existential threat to the Jewish state.

“They look at [Sen. John] McCain and they see a tough president willing to help them do what is necessary. The look at Obama and they see a liberal with big ideas. But when the time comes when Israel has to do something tough and not so beautiful, they don’t know whether he’ll say ‘do what you have to do,’ ” says Shmuel Rosner, an Israeli expert on US politics.

That perception has placed Senator McCain 12 points ahead of Obama in a recent poll conducted by the TNS Teleseker polling agency. The survey, commissioned by the Rabin Center for Israel Studies, found that 52.5 percent of those polled thought McCain would do a better job of protecting Israel.

This country’s preference runs counter to the likely choice among American Jews, who are expected to back Obama by at least 3 to 1, according to a recent Gallup poll. Also, the Democratic candidate’s popularity is stronger among younger, more dovish Israelis.

“People stop me on the street and ask me for reassurance that Obama will not be [elected]. It’s the old the ‘security first’ argument,” says Avraham Ben Tzvi, the US affairs commentator for Israel Radio and a professor of international relations at Haifa University.

What’s more, while the McCain campaign tries to distance itself from the Bush administration, Israel hopes he would carry on many of President Bush’s same policies, especially regarding the Middle East.

Obama’s condemnation of Hamas rocket attacks from Gaza on a visit to the Israeli border town of Sderot in July has helped allay concern that he would mark a radical shift in US allegiances.

Mr. Rosner says that initial concern among Israeli officials that Obama would take a critical line toward Israel, reminiscent of former Democratic President Jimmy Carter’s comments this past year, has eased somewhat in recent months.

But Obama’s thin foreign-policy record still counts as a looming question mark.

“McCain is seen as a safe bet. The gut feeling on whether the US will support Israel’s need to use force is a key element,” says Rosner, a former US correspondent for the Haaretz newspaper.

He says there’s little difference between the candidates on a possible peace accord between Israel and the Palestinians. But there’s been a hint of the candidates’ differing worldviews: Obama has called that conflict a “sore” that affects the Middle East – a view echoing former British Prime Minister Tony Blair – while McCain has said that a solution wouldn’t necessarily temper extremism.

Israeli public opinion, along with local experts, has been used on both sides of the campaign to make inroads with American Jews.

In August, a pro-Obama Jewish group produced an Internet video purporting to show a group of ex-generals and security experts endorsing Obama. Several participants later said the producers of the film misled them into believing it was a nonpartisan production.Kory Bardash, chair of the Israel chapter of the Republicans Abroad, speculated that 70 percent of the ex-pat vote from the Jewish state backed Mr. Bush in 2004.

“All the Jewish papers want to know what Israelis think,” says Mitchell Barak, a local pollster. “I hold that what Israelis think has absolutely no bearing on what American Jews think. Israel isn’t necessarily the sole issue.”

Public opinion polls have been sparse and volatile. A mid-June poll for the right-wing Mekor Rishon newspaper put McCain’s lead between 36 to 27 percent, but an Israel Radio poll taken at the same time showed an Obama advantage.

Indeed, Israel is no red state. During the Democratic and Republican primaries, Hillary Rodham Clinton polled as the most popular candidate because of Israelis’ memories of Bill Clinton’s close ties with former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin before his assassination.

Israelis with more dovish political leanings tend to speak more positively about an Obama presidency. Polls suggest he’s more popular with young Israelis.

“He symbolizes the winds of change,” says Gal Kachman, a psychology student at Tel Aviv University, sipping coffee at a cafe while a friend perused an article about Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

Mr. Kachman predicts that Israel would eventually fall into line with Obama’s backing for talks with Iran. He expresses hope that the Illinois senator would infuse Israel’s jaded public with a some optimism about politics.

“Because Obama is a rookie, it’s a gamble but the payoff is big. It’s change pushed to the extreme: black, young, inexperienced. Let’s go all the way.”

( More politics stories )

Comments

1. Ben | 10.27.08

How big was this poll sample set?

What’s the margin of error?

You shouldn’t really be able to quote statistics without those numbers…

I mean, what if the sample set is like 200 people? Then 52% of people saying McCain would do a better job protecting Israel means 104 people, to what I would assume is the negative of 96 people. 8 person difference. Not a lot to go on…What if the margin of error is 3%? Then 52% could actually mean 49%?

I’m just saying, if you are going to use math/statistics, provide all the details.

2. Anon | 10.28.08

It boils down to this:
Barak will play fair with the Palistinians
That will threaten the desire of isreal to wipe them out and create greater Zion
So they’re scared

3. Yankee | 10.28.08

I suggest that the prevalent fear of these anti-Obama Israelis is that Obama will not fall for the Zionist fiction that equates the security of Israel with license to Israel to continue its brutal and criminal occupation of Palestine. They sense the truth: Obama is oblivious to the Zionist myths behind this occupation. He sees the paramount mutual interest of the US and Israel as mid-east stability - not the turmoil-perpetuating Zionist colonial agenda to destroy Palestine and its Arab peoples.

4. Harold Reimann | 10.28.08

Israelis still have their heads screwed on straighter than Americans. The election should be held there.

5. Robert | 10.28.08

Robert -

Obvious Anti-Jewish and anti-Israel comments alleging that Zionism seeks to destroy Palestinians is not helpful. Recent experience, especially in Gaza, shows that the type of Palestinians in control of Gaza are doing more to destroy Palestinians than the Israelis have. And where these terrorists who are happy to terrorize their own people would enjoy killing Israelis even more, it is not surprising that the Israeli public, surrounded by hostile forces for the past 60+ years, would feel that security is of primary importance.

Back on point with the article, One cannot usually have perfect agreement with a candidate on all the issues, so one casts a vote for President on faith that he will be better on most issues than another candidate. American support for Israel is an important to me, but not the only issue. Obama’s pick of Joe Biden is encouraging on this front. Biden is a strong supporter of Israel over a long period of time.

It is important for us to support Israel, a vibrant democracy which has at least 9 Palestinians (Israeli Arabs) in their Knesset (Congress). Many people who have a one or two-dimensional view of Israel do not have any idea of this telling fact. Thank you.

6. Peter | 10.28.08

Israel is the only socialist welare state in the world subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. Israel is also just another theocratic state in the middle east dominated by religious fanatics.

7. Sean | 10.30.08

Zionism is kinda of a misnomer, isn’t it? I mean Israel has been around for 60 years so I say Zionism has been accomplished. Is Israel an Apartheid regime as Desmond Tutu, Jimmy Carter, and many others have said? undoubtedly. Am I concerned that the faith of OUR nation is dictated by an ally that is more bothersome than supportive? Yes. It worries me that our politicians are so easily distracted by the fleeting concerns of a nation that is more than capable of holding its own. Iran getting nuclear weapons doesn’t precipitate the end of the world. Pakistan falling under the control of the Al-qaeda Taliban regime in Waziristan is troublesome. Iranians, whatever you may think of them, are not interested in their own destruction. Listen, Tzipi Livni has said that Iran doesn’t represent an existential threat to Israel. Israel has nuclear weapons too and that has been the major deterrent to STATES acting out against them. No country is dumb enough to openly attack Israel, and the Iranians certainly are not as crazy as some of our candidates who purports to have foreign policy credentials because they are unnecessarily hawkish towards countries like Iran and Spain.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.