Politics
Politics Blog

Budget gap: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to raise taxes. (Rich Pedroncelli/AP)

In red, states seek tax hikes

Budget shortfalls are pushing many states to raise taxes in a recession.

By Daniel B. Wood  |  Staff writer/ January 7, 2009 edition

Reporter Dan Wood talks about the revenue struggle states like California and New York are having in this current recession.


President-elect Obama plans middle-class and business tax cuts to stimulate the economy, but the impact of those cuts could be softened by state governments trying to hike taxes and fees to close the worst budget gaps they’ve seen in decades.

Most states face a budget shortfall this year. New York and California each face gaps of approximately 25 percent of their total budgets.

That means possible taxes on gasoline – passed in Minnesota and Nevada last year and proposed in California – as well as fee hikes on everything from boats to cars, libraries, and parks. New Hampshire and New York raised cigarette taxes and Indiana has raised sales taxes.

The situation also means forgoing proposed or planned tax cuts. Florida canceled a sales tax holiday and California has suspended net operating loss deductions.

“States are telling us their revenue situations are a disaster,” says Arturo Pérez, analyst for the National Conference of State Legislatures in Denver. “They are looking at every possible way to make up for billions in lost revenue.”

These comprise both spending cuts and tax hikes. Iowa is cutting back on schools, Kentucky is cutting library hours, and Minnesota, where the Republican governor has said he will not raise taxes during a recession, is proposing to cut $5 billion from state services.

Illinois is contemplating an 8 cent gasoline tax to raise $7 billion and one proposal in California is for a 13 cent per gallon tax, which would help raise $9.5 billion.

At a conference of US state legislators December, Standard and Poor economist David Wyss told legislators to first consider hiking gasoline and sales taxes.

Still, tax hikes remain an unpopular solution. Despite the severity of the 2001 recession – the worst in 50 years at that time – there were few tax increases, according to Donald Boyd, fiscal analyst for the Rockefeller Institute for Study of the States. But this time around, the recession is worse, he says.

All told, 40 US states are reporting an estimated $150 billion in budget shortfalls.

California’s crisis

In California, where state finance director Mike Genest declared that this is “probably the most challenging budget situation the state has ever faced,” legislative Republicans have blocked several of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s tax hike proposals.

As the legislature convenes this week, it will examine the governor’s proposal for $14.3 billion in tax increases in addition to $17.4 billion in spending cuts over the next 18 months.

The state is attempting to close a projected $41.5 billion shortfall.

Mr. Schwarzenegger has already signed an executive order forcing 235,000 state workers to take two furlough days a month starting Feb. 1 and required a 10 percent cut for state agencies, which could lead to thousands of layoffs.

There is also talk of reinstating a notorious car registration fee that Schwarzenegger ended with great fanfare five years ago by staging the dropping of a giant wrecking ball on a rusting old car, and declaring, “Hasta la vista, baby!”

“Republicans cannot support the governor’s proposal to impose a $14 billion in higher taxes on Californians,” Assembly Minority leader Mike Villines told the San Francisco Chronicle last week.

Democrats hold majorities in both houses of the California legislature and have moved closer to Schwarzenegger’s position than Republicans. Nevertheless, the governor vetoed Tuesday a Democratic budget plan that fell short of meeting his demands on spending cuts.

California is one of only three states that requires a two-thirds legislative majority to pass a budget, which is why the state is often extremely late in doing so. When Schwarzenegger signed the most recent budget in September, it was 85 days after the fiscal year began, a record in state tardiness.

Worse before it gets better

Most states are reining in their budget projections for 2010 and anticipating still more cuts.

In New York, another state awash in red ink, Gov. David Patterson proposed 137 new or increased taxes and fees, including an obesity tax, and $9 billion worth of spending cuts in the coming fiscal year.

Reaction to a proposed 18 percent obesity tax ranged from high praise to ridicule: New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof calling it a “miracle tax diet” to rival the health benefits of not smoking, while the tabloid New York Post labelled it “Tax Hell.”

Meanwhile, Florida, trying to close a $2.3 billion gap in its $66 billion budget, this week is considering raising cigarette taxes. Increasing the tax by between $1 to $1.34 a pack will pull in $700 million annually for the state treasury.

By spring, legislators may also reconsider many of the exemptions they have given that now apply to dozens of goods and services, from accountants to ostrich farmers and charter boat fishing captains.

Like most states, Florida’s fiscal situation is expected to continue to deteriorate. Florida leads the nation in job losses and is among the worst hit by mortgage foreclosures. It has had to cut measures that were supposed to slow those problems – such as a small-business loan program and expanded tax credits for firms that create Florida jobs.

As on the national level, economists expect the fiscal situation for states is likely to get worse before it gets better.

Obama’s stimulus package may stave off further state tax increases, says Mr. Boyd, the fiscal analyst, since outright fiscal relief makes raising taxes harder to justify. Obama’s cuts may be close to 40 percent of a possible $775 billion bill.

But the potential for more tax hikes won’t go away, adds Boyd. And after constituencies see what spending cuts do, they might be more amenable to them.

( More politics stories )

Comments

1. ChrisMarks | 01.07.09

Why do we as a society allow businesses to go bankrupt, shed debts and liabilities and then go on operating? Its because we realize its in the general public good. These debt-ridden public entities would also enhance the public interest by following such a path. If instead they just receive a loan from Washington it will only dig a deeper hole for their citizens to climb out of.

2. Michael Bedar | 01.08.09

I hear states like California are reducing the number of school days, probably to save the money on teachers salaries - but the point about whether that is a good idea or not FOR THE CHILDREN is WHAT THEY DO WHILE NOT IN SCHOOL. If it is spent on mind-numbing consumer activities like watching advertisements on TV, which is sadly the reality for a lot of kids on non-school days, then this is bad news for their development into full human beings and futures.

On the other hand, if the children’s non-school days are filled with engaging experiential education, whether with tools, in stimulating social situations, in the outdoors, creating music, etc, then this could in the balance be good for children. Engaging learning situations happen in many cultural and work environments if the child is brought in and included, with appropriate protective boundaries and rules of course. I have seen it many times. This gives children something often more valuable than tiresome classroom or book-learning.

So parents, families, and neighborhoods - if we’re all battening down for a tough budget year, are we going to pull together to lift children up from a sad possible scenario of 5 more TV days, and create real valuable days for our children?

3. MiserDD | 01.08.09

1. ChrisMarks | 01.07.09 wrote: “Why do we as a society allow businesses to go bankrupt, shed debts and liabilities and then go on operating? Its because we realize its in the general public good. These debt-ridden public entities would also enhance the public interest by following such a path…”

Obviously you understand little of where public debt is owed. If the public debt were allowed to “follow such a path” as bankruptcy, then all those bonds that you bought for your kids (or had bought for you) would now be worthless paper. It would wipe out a huge number of the elderly retirement accounts which have been invested in public bonds because they are seen as A+++ investments (though with a small return, but the elderly need a guaranteed return and often can’t risk higher returns in the market). Additionally the “Social Security Trust Fund” has no money in it. It’s full of OIUs from the government. That money has all been borrowed against by the government. A huge portion of the national debt interest payment the government makes every year is towards interest on those loans, which is then immediately paid out as Social Security. Invalidate that debt and Social Security ceases to exist tomorrow, not twenty years from now. I think the saddest part of your comment is it shows how little Americans really know about to whom the “public entities” owe their debts.

4. l c lander | 01.08.09

While they’re considering cuts, why aren’t they considering cutting their own salary’s… Further, cut ALL new spending projects plus a substantial fine for any who propose ANY pork-barrel projects…

5. Diane | 01.08.09

I agree with taxing smokers as they’re suggesting in Florida. I live in Florida. Our biggest litter problem (as with all the states I’ve visited) is cigarette butts–In my yard from people walking by, at the entrances to every building, on the beaches, along the road…if I threw trash out of my car, I’d be subject to a fine. We don’t seem able to fine the largest group of litterers in the world. Tax them. We need the money.

6. Zebra | 01.13.09

Just tax the Democrats…….they LOVE taxes to support all their endless social programs.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.