Franken wins – 239 days after election
Senate incumbent Coleman bows out after Minnesota's Supreme Court rules for the Democratic challenger. Democrats gain crucial 60th Senate seat.
By Linda Feldmann | Staff writer/ June 30, 2009 edition
Craig Lassig/AP/File
Washington
Al Franken now knows that he’s good enough, smart enough, and doggone it, people like him.
That, of course, is a famous line from his days on “Saturday Night Live,” when he mocked the self-help movement as the character Stuart Smalley. But in his most recent incarnation, he is now a Democratic US senator from Minnesota.
Two-hundred-thirty-nine days after the 2008 election, Mr. Franken won his race for the US Senate. After a protracted court battle, which culminated Tuesday with a unanimous Minnesota Supreme Court ruling in Franken’s favor, incumbent Sen. Norm Coleman (R) conceded the race.
Democrats get, in theory, a supermajority
The victory gives the Democrats their 60th seat in the US Senate – a supermajority that, in theory, makes the body filibuster-proof. But even if getting all Senate Democrats to vote together – including two who have been absent due to illness – is tough, at the very least having Franken on board gives the party one more critical vote as it heads toward contentious votes on energy legislation and healthcare.
In remarks to supporters in St. Paul, Mr. Coleman congratulated Franken and explained why he opted not to take his case into federal court.
“I have never believed that my service is irreplaceable,” he said. “We have reached the point where further litigation damages the unity of our state, which is also fundamental. In these tough times, we all need to focus on the future. And the future today is we have a new United States senator.”
Minnesota’s high court found for Franken
Earlier on Tuesday, the Minnesota Supreme Court had ruled 5-to-0 to uphold a three-judge panel’s ruling that found Franken had won 312 more votes than former Sen. Norm Coleman last Nov 4. On Sunday, Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R) told CNN that he would abide by the ruling of his state’s highest court, however it ruled. By conceding, Coleman takes Governor Pawlenty out of the awkward position of having potentially to go against the wishes of his party, if he had opted not to certify the race after all. Pawlenty is not running for reelection in 2010 and is believed to be considering a run for the presidency in 2012.
With Pawlenty leaving the governor’s seat, one option for Coleman is to run for that office. But in his remarks Thursday, he said he had not made a decision about the future.
The last time the Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate was in the 94th Congress, 1975-1977. Then, the Democrats had 60 seats, Republicans held 38, one member belonged to the Conservative Party, and there was one independent. In the current Senate, two members classified as independent caucus with the Democrats, and thus the Democrats effectively hold 60 seats.
According to numbers tallied by MSNBC, the recount cost at least $11 million and the two candidates spent $50.3 million in all between them. A total of 2,424,946 votes were cast, and the final victory margin was 312 votes.
Comments
2. Eric Wenger | 07.01.09
It is a shame that the voters of Minnesota have elected to the Senate, a jester, and a nasty one at that. This state was once regarded highly for its progressive stances and good governance, but lately its voters have taken it in a bizarre direction.
The concession speech of Sen. Coleman showed him to be a highly intelligent, thoughtful and decent public servant. The whole episode is another sad sign of our country’s decline. When I voted for Mr. Obama, I did not expect to have Al Franken ride in on his coattails.
3. Gary G | 07.01.09
To Eric - you comments do not have the ring of truth to it. To be fair to the voters of Minnesota, darn near 1/2 of them voted for Franken, the other half for Coleman, thus you are too harsh on “the voters” and their “bizarre direction” since the outcome is something that you don’t like.
Then your next sentence: So it was “the concession speech” of Sen. Coleman that revealed him to be a “thoughtful and decent public servant.” I’ve read it portions BTW - and I agree that it was a good and gracious one. Seems to me that you felt that way long before the speech was made.
Perhaps as Franken steps into his new role, he may also reveal himself to be a “thoughtful and decent public servant.” You won’t notice, of course, on day One - you have trashed him. Perhaps you should behave more like Coleman, who called Franken and personally congratulated him. That would show some class.
4. Teresa Vasey | 07.02.09
Dear Eric, you did so not vote for Obama. Another transparent try for the repugs to try to confuse people. Coleman charged the people of America millions of dollars just so he wouldn’t have to get a real job. Nice try. Good luck. He can always become a lobbyist, none of them have any morals. He should try tobacco or pharmacuticals. He’ll have a job for life. Franken is an extremely smart man, who just may show this country how idiotic it really is. He did it on SNL, how amazing it will be to see how he does it to the actual idiots who run the Congress.
5. Dutra | 07.02.09
Send in the clowns. We will need to hide Big Al from the cameras and microphones. This man is a gaff personified.
6. Rick Soule | 07.02.09
It’s funny to me how Republicans are always screaming that we need fewer “politicians” in the government, until a Democrat gets in. It’s also interesting that when a Democrat speaks, he’s being “nasty”; but when a Republican speaks, he’s being “honest”!
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.



1. Peter Emm | 06.30.09
I don’t think he “won”but anyway one more clown in our government.