Politics
Politics Blog

Sen. Arlen Specter (D) addresses the Pennsylvania Democratic State Committee Meeting in Pittsburgh, June 6. Senator Specter switched from the Republican Party two months ago.

(Gene J. Puskar/AP)

Photos (1 of 1)

Are Specter’s Senate days numbered?

The five-term senator from Pennsylvania faces dipping polls and now, a Democratic primary contender in Rep. Joe Sestak.

By Linda Feldmann  |  Staff writer/ July 1, 2009 edition

Washington

When Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania joined the Democratic Party two months ago, he was fleeing a tough Republican primary. Now, he may face a tough Democratic primary.

Rep. Joe Sestak (D) of Pennsylvania has all but formally announced his candidacy for Senator Specter’s seat, regularly telling interviewers he’s running. On Wednesday, Congressman Sestak told the Wayne County, Penn., newspaper, The Wayne Independent: “I am going to get into the race against Arlen Specter.”

Sestak, a retired Navy admiral, could undercut Specter from two directions – appealing to conservatives with his military background while appealing to progressives with his support for President Obama’s domestic agenda. For Mr. Obama, the pressure on Specter from the left could be a godsend during these next critical months, when the president will need every Democratic vote. Just days after Specter switched parties, he said on “Meet the Press:” “I did not say I would be a loyal Democrat.”

Does Sestak have a chance? Specter is a five-term senator, a seasoned campaigner, and a survivor. Time and again, he has delivered for his state. He has beat back fierce opponents before, as well as serious illness. He also has the backing of President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D), and the state’s other senator, Bob Casey (D).

But all that establishment support for Specter may backfire. Pennsylvanians don’t like being dictated to, and polls now show that they’re not sure about Specter. In March, before Specter’s April 28 party switch, his job approval rating was 52 percent, according to the Franklin & Marshall College poll. By June it had dropped to 34 percent.

The poll also shows Specter leading Sestak among Democratic primary voters 33 percent to 13 percent, with 48 percent undecided. No incumbent senator wants half his state on the fence about him, however early in the election cycle.

“Republicans deserted him en masse, Democrats don’t quite trust him, and independents worry about what he stands for,” says Terry Madonna, director of the Franklin & Marshall poll.

Still, Sestak faces an uphill battle. He remains largely unknown outside his district, which includes some Philadelphia suburbs and most of Delaware County, and he will have to raise many millions of dollars in a state with some expensive TV markets. Specter can be expected to raise all the money he needs. Sestak has said he doesn’t have to raise as much money as Specter, but he has to raise “enough.”

Another unknown about Sestak is how he will do as a campaigner in a tough race. He unseated a longtime incumbent, Rep. Curt Weldon (R), in 2006, but Congressman Weldon was mired in scandal and President Bush was unpopular, which tilted the playing field toward the Democrat. Sestak had to present himself as a credible alternative, and he did.

For now, nobody rules out a sixth term for Specter.

“He’s like Houdini, he’s a master escape artist of whatever hole you get him in,” says Mr. Madonna. “I don’t think you can automatically say that Sestak rolls over him.”

On the Republican side, former Rep. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania is so far the only serious contender for his party’s nomination. But no matter who he might face in the general election, the conservative Mr. Toomey would be the underdog in a state that is now solidly blue.

( More politics stories )

Comments

1. Forrest | 07.01.09

This race will come down to the Employee Free Choice Act. If Joe Sestak votes for the Act and Arlen Specter votes against it, Joe will win the Democratic primary.

2. smokehouse | 07.02.09

“in a state that is now solidly blue”…..Don’t give me that baloney Linda. For God sake look at the election results state map. Dems rule Pittsburg and corrupt Philadelphia. Everything else in solid Republican.

3. Pocono Joe | 07.02.09

Are Specter’s Senate days numbered? Let’s HOPE. Now that’s CHANGE I can believe in.

And hopefully we can soon say the same for Ed Rendell, John Murtha, and the surpassingly disappointing “Blue-Dog-In-Name” only Bob Casey.

4. Abu Rahman | 07.02.09

Do you know how Hudini died? Three punches in his abdomen.
Do you know what was his last word: ” I am weak, I list the fight”

5. usr102 | 07.02.09

I don’t care who beats Specter … Democrat or Republican … as long as he is gone!

6. proteus48084 | 07.02.09

It may well be that Specter is a rat who has deserted a sinking ship. However, no matter how celebrated the rat, a rat remains a rat.

It will be interesting to see how much support this rat gets from his new-found friends.

7. David S. Levine | 07.02.09

Snarlin Arlen, personally and politically, has a foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. He has been self seeking filth his whole miserable life–why would anyone want him reelected?

Just one incident tells it all. On a Sunday morning program just after his defection he spoke about his opposition to Robert Bork as being “out of the mainstream” at the same time as he spoke about his leading Thomas, Roberts and Alito through confirmation. Just HOW are the views of the latter three different from those of Robert Bork, probably the greatest legal scholar of the 20th Century? He didn’t explain and was not held to account by the questioner, a mainstream media liberal.

Too bad he was not defeated by Congressman Twoomey six years ago and it’s just great that the population of the sewer he climbed back into will defeat him next year.

Good riddance to him!

8. gabe | 07.02.09

Solidly blue? So that is why the state house and legisalture are Republican controlled eh? It was a good report until that little ending. Get your facts straight.

9. JohnR | 07.02.09

I don’t know about Specter, but Sestak is NOT the guy. As a three star admiral he was relieved of his assignment in the Pentagon by the CNO for abusive behavior. IMO Sestak is another one of these hubristic, power hungry admirals/generals. He’s in the same category as Wesley Clark and Alexander Haig.

10. Alex | 07.02.09

It couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

11. waldo5 | 07.03.09

I hope Mr. Specter can keep his Senate seat. I am a long-time resident of California, yet I have observed Mr. Specter and his office carefully since he has been in the Senate. He has done well; he stands more for principle than person, prudence rather than party.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.