South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford collects his thoughts Tuesday, as he admits to The Associated Press more encounters with his Argentine mistress than he previously has disclosed, in his office in Columbia, S.C.
(Mary Ann Chastain/AP)Photos (1 of 1)
Is Sanford too lovesick to govern?
Pressure to resign mounts as the Republican South Carolina governor's emotional outpourings raise doubts among his own party.
By Patrik Jonsson | Staff writer/ July 2, 2009 edition
Atlanta
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford hasn’t budged on his vow to remain in office despite laying bare his heart about his trysts with an Argentine lover and encounters with other women.
But some political observers say the love affair and the furor around it has clouded Governor Sanford’s judgment, leaving him too distracted and politically damaged to last much longer as the Palmetto State’s chief executive.
Sanford has turned important business of the state into “The Mark Sanford Show,” says veteran political observer and lobbyist John Crangle.
“He’s lost contact with reality,” says Mr. Crangle. “He seems to go up and down like a yo-yo: One minute he’s involved in the transports of love and romance, and the next thing he’s crying in Argentina for five days. He’s really on a roller coaster, and I’m concerned.”
The lovesick governor is somewhat unusual among political sex scandals, which don’t generally involve waxing lyrical about “magnificent, gentle kisses,” as Sanford did in e-mails to Maria Belen Chapur, the former TV reporter with whom he had an affair for at least a year.
So, will this affair affect Sanford’s future or not?
Andy Brack, publisher of the S.C. Statehouse Report, says he thinks “the pressure is now off” Sanford, and he should be able to serve out his term.
But more than half of the Republican-controlled state Senate has called for Sanford’s resignation. And some say the governor is losing the grass-roots support – including retirees, rural voters, and evangelicals – he relied on in making unpopular decisions such as his attempt to reject federal stimulus dollars, a fight he eventually lost in court.
“I’m concerned about his mental well-being,” state Senate Majority Leader Harvey Peeler Jr. told The State newspaper in Columbia, S.C. Mr. Peeler has called for Sanford to step down.
Sanford’s contradictory statements, such as admitting that Ms. Chapur is his “soul mate” while saying he wants to fall back in love with his wife, may not be helping his case.
In an interview with the Associated Press this week, Sanford revealed that he’d seen Chapur more often than previously noted and had “crossed lines” with other women during his career. He described his affair with Chapur as “a love story. A forbidden one, a tragic one, but a love story at the end of the day.”
It’s of course impossible to know what exactly Sanford is thinking. But psychologists say that heightened states of emotion can impact how people perceive the world around them.
“Emotion can help our decisionmaking, and it can also make it worse,” says Douglas Wedell, a psychology professor at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, who studies judgment and decisionmaking.
Meanwhile, a preliminary investigation has cleared Sanford of any potential criminal acts such as misappropriated state funds during his transnational trysts. There are provisions in state law to remove a mentally unstable governor, but that’s unlikely to happen.
And forcing Sanford to resign could create another leadership crisis. Lt. Gov. André Bauer has also shown some volatile qualities, some critics say, citing two stops this past year for driving more than 100 miles per hour.
Comments
2. David | 07.02.09
Yes, too “lovesick” to govern. Also very misguided about his actions and feelings. What he is experiencing is the high from a “crush” or infatuation for a woman combined the longing for something missing in his life. This is far from a love story, and the only thing tragic (other than his actions) is that he thinks it IS a love story. This is nothing more than a man cheating on his wife and abusing his power. Based this simplistic explanation of his actions, he obviously has no idea what it means to really love another woman and be the leader of a family–the committment, sacrafice and self control implied, among other things. Love is not chasing a broad around the globe, having giddy, sexual encounters–that’s something else entirely.
3. Virginia | 07.02.09
Is he too lovesick to govern? He really hasn’t done much governing that I’ve ever noticed (and yes, I’ve lived in SC during his terms of office and paid attention to state politics).
Sanford’s relationship with the SC legislature is so poor that he has- thankfully!- been unable to push through his ‘Club for Greed’ agenda despite having a GOP majority in the state Senate & House. It takes a truly special person to make the SC legislature look good in comparison…
It’s a sad commentary on US politics when the hypocrisy of a wealthy man denying aid to the residents of one of this country’s poorest states rates as nothing compared to the hypocrisy of sexual infidelity. I don’t just mean the gov’s attempts to reject federal stimulus money- Sanford has never made any noticeable attempts to improve education or the standard of living in this state. His main m.o. is to oppose taxes and state spending on anything- I guess some people might call that governing?
4. Steve | 07.02.09
Bauer’s speeding was 3 yrs ago, not this past year. Also, Reggie Lloyd of SLED that cleared Sanford is a member of his cabinet. What else is he supposed to do?
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.




1. patty smith | 07.02.09
I think the guy, as a republican, needs to stay and continue to disrespect his wife, family and the people of South Carolina. In addition, I think he should continue on with the right’s message of family, marriage and Christian values- ya know do the speaking out of both sides of mouth trick.
Seriously, the guy is not firing from all cylinders, gears are not shifting correctly-