Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is charged with 16 counts of corruption including racketeering conspiracy, wire fraud, extortion conspiracy, attempted extortion, and making false statements to federal agents.
(Nam Y. Huh/ AP/ File)Photos (1 of 1)
A blow for Illinois’s Blagojevich in corruption case
Under threat of lengthy jail time, his former chief of staff agreed on Wednesday to be a prosecution witness.
By Mark Guarino | Correspondent/ July 8, 2009 edition
Gerald Herbert/AP/File
John Harris, Blagojevich's former chief of staff, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and pledged cooporation with prosecutors in exchange for a lighter sentence if convicted.
Chicago
Former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s campaign to clear his name of corruption charges suffered a major blow Wednesday when John Harris, his former chief of staff, entered a plea agreement with the US Attorney’s Office in Chicago. [Editor’s note: The original version misstated the date of the plea agreement.]
Mr. Harris pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud, and he pledged cooporation with prosecutors in exchange for a lighter sentence if convicted.
Mr. Blagojevich is charged with 16 counts of corruption including racketeering conspiracy, wire fraud, extortion conspiracy, attempted extortion, and making false statements to federal agents. He has insisted he is innocent of all charges.
Harris served as Blagojevich’s chief of staff from late 2005 until last December. He and the governor are among six people charged in April with 19 counts of “pervasive fraud.”
The plea agreement is the first in this case, although political insiders say that between now and the trial’s opening day in June 2010 there probably will be more.
“[Blagojevich] will soon be the last man standing,” says Andy Shaw, executive director of the Better Government Association, a watchdog group in Chicago. Mr. Shaw, who was a long-time political reporter for WLS-TV, says “this case is over” due to a growing number of cooperating witnesses who were close to Blagojevich when he was governor.
Last month, Christopher Kelly, Blagojevich’s former adviser and chief fundraiser, was sentenced to 37 months in prison on federal tax fraud charges for concealing the use of corporate funds from a roofing company he owned to cover gambling debts. Mr. Kelly is also involved in a second case in which he is charged in a kickback scheme against United Airlines and American Airlines at O’Hare International Airport. The trial for that case starts in September.
Those cases were not connected to the Blagojevich indictments because they did not involve the misuse of public funds.
Prosecutors also have access to the possible cooperation of Antoin “Tony” Rezko, a top Blagojevich adviser and fundraiser who was convicted in June 2008 on 16 federal corruption charges for trading his clout.
Shaw says prosecutors “now have a litany of cooperating witnesses, people who were right there in the room as Senate seats were being bartered and contracts traded for contributions, and jobs and positions on boards were sold off for cash.”
“They’re all going to stand up, one by one, and paint a picture of the worst pay-to-play corruption this state has ever seen,” says Shaw.
Under the plea deal, Harris faces a maximum of 35 months in prison, providing the testimony he offers proves accurate. Without the plea arrangement, the maximum for the charge is 20 years. Randall Samborn, spokesman with the US Attorney’s Office, says as of Wednesday Harris “is the only one to plead guilty at this point.”
The plea agreement states that in 2008 Harris aided Blagojevich’s attempts to sell the US Senate seat vacated by President Obama. Harris also was alleged to have threatened the Chicago Tribune with the withholding of state funds if the newspaper did not fire editorial staffers critical of the governor. He also was charged with pressuring financial institutions that did business with the state to give his wife a job.
Messages left for Harris’s attorney and Blagojevich’s spokesperson were not returned at time of writing.
—–
Follow us on Twitter.
Comments
3. WILLIAM CHILDS | 07.09.09
The big question is “will pres Obama be cleared or smeared by the testimony of these witnesses?”
4. Luise of the Phoenix | 07.09.09
There has been NO viable link between President Obama and ex-Gov. Blagojevitch. THe only things the two hav in common is the fact they have both been legislators in Illinois. That’s not a legal reason to presume they have anythiong in common other that the fact they belong to the same political party. The implication that the President will possibly be smeared or even NEEDS to be cleared is sheer vile speculation on Willima Childs’ part.
5. dorothy hackney | 07.09.09
If we ever can clean up Chicago and New York City, it will be a Glorious Day … I am from the Chicago area…lots of really good people, I also lived in New York, lots of wonderful people!!! However, all you hear about is the bad and the ugly, and most unfortunately, many of them are the people that run the cities…LET’S US “GOOD FOLKS” TAKE OVER CHICAGO AND NEW YORK CITY…LET’S RUN THESE GREAT CITIES HONEST, AND HONORABLE!!! COME ON EVERY BODY!!! I believe it can be done!!! I’m a believer in HUMAN KIND! ! ! BELIEVE…BELIEVE… I BELIEVE IN OBAMA!! He is the very best that has come out of Chicago…(I’m old, and I’m white, and not poor, either…and I’m Republican; I believe, and I know he and his family are good. He is not perfect, but he is better than I’ve ever seen come out of Chicago, or New York City…Blessings to all.)
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.




1. Robert Levine | 07.08.09
If they get more on Burris, the Democrats better think twice about defending him, rather than cutting their losses and maybe going along with a special election. This situation is a cancer on the party, and the sooner they cut it out and separate themselves from it, the less they will lose.