A Los Angeles Fire Department official is administered the H1N1 vaccine at a public health clinic in Encino, Calif. on Friday.
(Damian Dovarganes/AP)Photos (1 of 1)
America in the midst of two major ‘national emergencies’
Terror threat plus H1N1 flu emergency could test Constitutional protections.
By Patrik Jonsson | Staff writer/ October 24, 2009 edition
Just over a month after extending the 9/11 national emergency for another year, President Obama announced another federal emergency on Saturday over the worsening H1N1, or swine flu situation.
The president’s proclamation – “The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in the United States constitutes a national emergency,” it reads – allows the government to give healthcare providers legal waivers as a means to better handle any flood of new patients.
The White House said the dramatic language isn’t based on any new findings, but is intended simply to allow greater flexibility for healthcare providers.
But news about H1N1 has steadily worsened in recent days as the flu, which authorities say threatens mostly children, young people, and pregnant women, is now widespread in 46 states and has caused 411 confirmed deaths and more than 8,000 hospitalizations, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Delays in distribution of the new H1N1 vaccine is also worrying many Americans.
“The H1N1 is moving rapidly, as expected. By the time regions or healthcare systems recognize they are becoming overburdened, they need to implement disaster plans quickly,” White House spokesman Reid Cherlina explained to the Washington Post.
The US has been under near constant national emergency since the Korean War. Presidential emergency declarations go back to the founding of the Republic and have included the Whiskey Rebellion and the Great Depression. The political philosopher John Locke believed that not just war and natural disasters but simply the “common good” could be a good enough reason to impose an emergency.
Indeed, most declared emergencies have less to do with real threats to Americans and more to do, for example, with trade or, as in one current emergency, an import ban on rough diamonds from Sierra Leone.
Emergency powers under President Bush’s declaration shortly after 9/11 have been credited with successfully interdicting terrorist cells. But civil libertarians argue that the Bush administration crossed constitutional lines with some of its interrogation and communications interdiction initiatives.
Presidents are technically not allowed to waive any right but habeas corpus during an emergency. But their legal powers extend farther than that, and these have largely gone unchecked by Congress or the courts.
“When the president formally declares a national emergency, he may seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise, restrict travel and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens,” writes Harold Relyea, a specialist in national government with the Congressional Research Service, an arm of the Library of Congress.
The reform-minded National Emergencies Act of 1976 intended to formalize executive branch emergency powers and force declarations to automatically lapse after a year. But the standard operating procedure has been for presidents to simply renew ongoing emergencies year after year.
Mr. Obama’s swine flu declaration is the 33rd national emergency declaration since 1976.
—–
Follow us on Twitter.
Comments
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.
1. matti may | 10.24.09
i would like to know why this author thinks > “Delays in distribution of the new H1N1 vaccine is also worrying many Americans.”
because all the stories i have read say there has been a low turn out for flu shots. Also lets report on how much the drug companies have made off this ****, and our lovely government protecting them from lawsuits. They want to force us to be vaccinated and when many of us end up like DESIREE JENNINGS, they will say oops too bad.
This agenda of change is all wrong… Keep Your Change, there are plenty of socialist countries move there. I hated Bush and clinton and bush and carter, and now obama! Obviously these people hate us too, its time to take america back from the bankers Since 1913 this country has lost its way. Look It up 1913 they stole our country, and now, we want it back!
They want martial law because they know that we know… This country was built on the idea of FREEDOM, not service, change, and civilian armies, not health care for all, not taxes, do you know the founders revolted against less than ten percent tax … while we **** around allowing our work to be plundered, as they take 50 percent, at what percent will you recognize that you are a slave, with iphones and uggs? best chains are the ones you cannot see or feel. Slave for money then you die. This is not the path to salvation.