Politics
Politics Blog

People form the number 350 with umbrellas on the steps of the Opera House in Sydney, Australia, on Saturday. Scientists claim that the upper limit for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere should be no more that 350 parts per million to avoid runaway climate change.

(Rob Griffith/AP)

Photos (1 of 1)

The world demonstrates against climate change, but US public concern wanes

Activities around the world Saturday focused on the need to reduce carbon emissions. But a new Pew survey shows that fewer and fewer Americans believe there is solid evidence the earth is warming.

By Brad Knickerbocker  |  Staff writer/ October 24, 2009 edition

Around the world Saturday, environmental activists touted the number “350” as a way to recognize the seriousness of global climate change.

It’s not a secret code. The number refers to the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere – meeting a goal of 350 parts per million (ppm), which is considerably less than the current level of 387 ppm.

The “International Day of Climate Action” includes more than 4,500 events in 173 countries. Everything from skiers in New Zealand spelling out “350” on a snowy slope to a mass bike ride in Canada to tree planting in Ghana. Here’s an interactive map of the day’s activities.

“It seems far-fetched that you could get this many people to rally around a scientific data point, but the number just keeps climbing,” says Bill McKibben, author, activist, and founder of 350.0rg. ”It shows just how scared of global warming much of the planet really is, and how fed up at the inaction of our leaders.”

Environmentalists see today’s events as a call to action – in the US Congress and at the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December.

“The Arctic is already melting, sea level is already rising, and polar bears are already dying,” says Rose Braz of the Center for Biological Diversity. “As President Obama prepares for the international climate negotiations in Copenhagen, the time to act is now. If we fail to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide to 350 parts per million or below, many thousands of species, including our own human race, face a perilous future.”

Though Saturday’s turnout may have been impressive – Archbishop Desmond Tutu was among the luminaries involved as “messengers” – public interest in and concern about global climate change have been dropping in the United States. This, according to the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, which released new survey results this week. The conclusion:

“There has been a sharp decline over the past year in the percentage of Americans who say there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising. And fewer also see global warming as a very serious problem – 35 percent say that today, down from 44 percent in April 2008.”

Pew finds that since April 2008, the percentage of Americans surveyed who believe there is “solid evidence the earth is warming” has dropped from 71 percent to 57 percent.

“Over the same period,” reports Pew, “there has been a comparable decline in the proportion of Americans who say global temperatures are rising as a result of human activity, such as burning fossil fuels. Just 36 percent say that currently, down from 47 percent last year.”

Although the decline is steeper for Republicans, the drop-off occurred among Democrats and especially among Independents. All of which makes it tougher for lawmakers to pass substantive laws dealing with greenhouse-gas emissions, for the Obama administration as it assumes a stronger environmental leadership role for the United States, and for diplomats trying to negotiate international agreements reversing global warming.

So once all of today’s hoopla is a memory, the 350.org folks will still have a lot of work ahead of them.

—–

Follow us on Twitter.

( More politics stories )

Comments

1. Tom R. Burns | 10.24.09

Spencer, there are also lots of people who believe the earth is flat. While the exact number 350 is questionable, the concept of a limit or tipping point is well-known in ecological and system analyses. More importantly is the mobilization of millions of people through the efforts of Bill McKibben and the 350.0rg Movement to Save the Planet in Peril.

The current concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is beyond the safety limit (350 parts per million) and the planet is at a tipping point, risking human survival itself. The campaign was launched ahead of the Copenhagen meetings by Bill McKibben and others is successfully raising consciousness about the 350 figure and the catastrophe in store if no remedial actions are adopted.
350.org is a platform, a global network connecting people in every corner of the planet. The network consists of over 200 organizations around the world and every continent is well represented. Bill McKibben is, in addition to being a well-known writer, activist, and co-founder of 350.org, a scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College in the USA. He is the author of The End of Nature, which was the first book for a general audience on climate change. We interviewed him at a recent international conference in Oslo, Norway — the Oslo Sustainability Summit.
Many scientists now believe that 350 is the highest number that is safe. In a paper published by NASA scientist Jim Hansen, he writes that above 350, we cannot have a planet on which life adapted. Those are very strong words for a scientific paper. We used to think that numbers like 450 would be safe, but that changed in the summer of 2007, when the ice in the Arctic suddenly started melting at a rate no-one had imagined. The ice was melting 50 to 60 years ahead of when the computer models said that it would. There was 25 percent less ice in the Arctic than there had ever been, at least for millions of years; photos of the Earth from space looked very different.
Now, if one degree temperature rise melts the arctic, we don’t want to see what two degrees will do, much less three or four. There are scary and insidious feedback loops. The permafrost is melting and releasing methane gas, and once that gets out of hand we’ll never get back. Some scientists say that it is already too late to stop global warming, that we’ve waited too long.”
“Glaciers are also melting. The glaciers on the Himalayan plateau provide water to rivers like the Ganges, the Yellow, the Brahmaputra, etcetera. One in three people on Earth live downstream from these rivers. The glacier above the Ganges will be gone by 2035 at the rate it is going. And let me tell you a little about Bangladesh, a country with more than a 120 million people. These people are basically screwed. Their rivers are flooding because of melting glaciers, and the Bay of Bengal is rising. Salt water is leaking into their soils and, when I was there, there was an outbreak of what is called dengue fever, which is increasing due to rising temperatures. The people are suffering because of global warming, and the thing is that none of them have done a damn thing to make it happen. Bangladesh’s emissions are not even measurable on the scale, they’re within the margin of error. The U.S., with four percent of the world’s population, is responsible for 25 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. I was at a hospital where people were dying of dengue fever and I thought to myself that one out of every four of those hospital beds are our fault. There are around 300 000 people dying every year from global warming, a number that is going to go up exponentially.”
McKibben and others behind the 350.org movement have built a mass movement around the world, as strong in the North as in the South. Among the more than 160 countries involved, there were mountain climbers unfolding banners with the number 350 on mountain tops, there were people playing planetary scrabble, forming a 3 in India, a 5 in South Africa and a 0 in Florida. The intent was to have the media pay attention and show some very powerful images in the weeks before the UN Climate Change meetings in Copenhagen in December. 350.org had more than 4000 actions taking place around the world. Their major goal was to establish the idea of limits (such as approximately 350 ppm) in the minds of as many people as possible. McKibben stresses, “People need to get involved politically, it isn’t enough for people to just change their own individual behavior, it’s too late for that.”
We also asked Bill McKibben how the planet earth can get back to 350 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere when it is already close to 390.
“We’ll have to stop burning coal by 2030. We’ll probably use all the easily accessible oil, I mean it’s too valuable to be left alone.
At the same time, there are powerful vested interests in the fossil fuel economy, and McKibben is not sure that they can be overcome. “They may be too powerful, and we may lose. But they grow weaker everyday, as people become aware of the problem.”
Finally, we asked Bill McKibben if he is an optimist or a pessimist regarding our chances of saving the planet. He answered directly:
“Look, I’ve stopped being an optimist or a pessimist. I just get up in the morning and do what I can. Clearly, the outcome is uncertain; all I can do is shift the odds. Right now we may have a 15 percent chance of succeeding; maybe if we in 350.org do all we can, we might make it 20 percent. Given the stakes, I think it’s worth it”

Max Jerneck (free lance journalist, Sweden) and Tom R. Burns (Visiting Scholar, Stanford University and Professor Emeritus, Uppsala, Sweden), email: tomburns@stanford.edu

2. Tony | 10.26.09

Pew’s environment group has disavowed this poll saying it is inconsistent with other polls. Besides polls are the wrong tool for measuring support for climate. It’s pretty silly to poll people on facts - polls are meant to gauge OPINIONS - like ‘do you support action to combat global warming’.

An August Zogby poll showed 71 percent support the House climate bill. A June Washingtpon Post poll showed 3/4 support strong climate action. A later post poll showed a strong majority supporting Congress and the administration’s clean energy policies.”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Comment

  By clicking "Submit Comment", you agree to our Terms of Service.

We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.

Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.

Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.

Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.