President Barack Obama speaks about education at the Wright Middle School in Madison, Wisconsin, Wednesday.
(Larry Downing/Reuters)Photos (1 of 1)
Schools sprinting to win Obama’s Race to the Top billions
In speech Wednesday, Obama touts his $4.35 billion bid to reshape education in America. Schools nationwide are eager to compete for Race to the Top funds.
By Amanda Paulson | Staff writer/ November 4, 2009 edition
President Obama touted Race to the Top to the nation in a speech in Madison, Wis., Wednesday. But schools already know it well.
Mr. Obama’s $4.35 billion in Race to the Top funds have already spurred significant education reform in a number of states – even though the final guidelines for the program haven’t yet been announced, no states have yet applied, and the first grants won’t be made until at least April.
The program offers competitive grants to states that have policies aligned with certain federal priorities. These priorities include a willingness to evaluate teachers using student achievement, an openness to charter schools, and a commitment to building long-term data systems to track student performance.
Now, numerous states are revisiting laws that would disqualify them from the grants or make their applications less attractive.
“The administration has done a good job of having a lot of states make a long-odds bet that they’re going to win Race to the Top funds, so they’ve shaped their behavior a lot in advance of a single dollar being awarded,” says Russ Whitehurst, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. “Most of what the administration is going to get [in terms of reform] it will get before the competition is actually completed.”
Changes coming
Obama highlighted these changes Wednesday.
• Some states, including California, Indiana, and Wisconsin are taking steps to remove “firewall” laws that prohibit student achievement from being used to grade teacher performance.
• Four states – Illinois, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Delaware – have raised or lifted their caps on the number of charter schools they permit, and at least seven more are working to do so.
• Some of the 11 states that don’t yet allow charter schools are considering proposals to do so.
“We’re saying, if you’re committed to real change in the way you educate your kids; if you’re willing to hold yourselves more accountable; if you develop a strong plan to improve the quality of education in your state, we’ll offer you a grant to help make that plan a reality,” Obama said in his remarks.
A competition for prestige
In federal terms, the $4 billion in Race to the Top funds is relatively small – especially compared with the other $95 billion for education, also included in the stimulus package, which went to more traditional expenditures like saving teacher jobs.
But the innovative design has given the money an outsize influence, say analysts – the promise of extra funds and the prestige that comes with it spurring states to demonstrate that they’re worthy.
“This is very historic…. You’re looking at a fundamental redefining of the federal role,” says Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform. With the guidelines that the administration has set forward, he adds, “there’s an established criteria for what it means to be a reform-minded governor or an education leader… The prestige is proving almost as valuable as the money.”
Four key areas of reform
In its draft guidelines for the fund, released in July, the administration announced it would be focusing on four key areas:
• Enacting internationally benchmarked standards, and tying assessments to them.
• Attracting and retaining good teachers, including measures such as performance pay and achievement-based evaluation systems.
• Improving data collection and using it to drive instruction.
• Using effective turnaround approaches for failing schools.
The right reforms?
Mr. Whitehurst of the Brookings Institution applauds the general guidelines in the reform, though he questions some of the particulars.
“It’s been a mistake to ignore curriculum,” he says. Evidence suggests a high-quality curriculum can make enormous difference in student achievement, he adds.
Whitehurst also questions the decision to place so much emphasis on charter schools and on turning around failing schools, calling such strategies more “hopeful” than “evidence-based.”
Be that as it may, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan “today has more money at his disposal to bring about change than any secretary of education has ever had,” says Jack Jennings, director of the Center on Education Policy in Washington.
To Mr. Jennings, the priorities that Race to the Top emphasizes seem aligned with where school reform is headed.
“This is the next wave of school reform, and it’s eclipsing No Child Left Behind,” Jennings says. “The conversation has shifted to charter schools, data systems, tying pay to performance, and common standards. It’s as if we’ve moved on.”
See also:
Obama’s $4 billion is massive incentive for school reform
—–
Follow us on Twitter.
Comments
2. Cap Lee | 11.05.09
So far they miss the mark. Systemic change is necessary, this only re shuffles the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Carnegie units began in 1906 and are of no value today.
Demonstrations of learning in the form of proficiencies should guide progress.
Students learn iat different rates and in different ways, accept it and deal with it.
Current test scores has nothing to do with kids.
and on and on. For my new book go to http://www.wholechildreform.com
Saving Students from a Shattered System
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Comment
We do not publish all comments, and we do not publish comments immediately. The comments feature is a forum to discuss the ideas in our stories. Constructive debate - even pointed disagreement - is welcome, but personal attacks on other commenters are not, and will not be published.
Tip: Do not write a novel. Keep it short. We will not publish lengthy comments. Come up with your own statements. This is not a place to cut and paste an email you received. If we recognize it as such, we won't post it.
Please do not post any comments that are commercial in nature or that violate copyrights.
Finally, we will not publish any comments that we regard as obscene, defamatory, or intended to incite violence.




1. Mike Johnson | 11.04.09
Good story, but as with many things in the Obama administration we are left with appetizers instead of a main dish. I do, however, agree with the decision to leave out guidelines for curriculum development. Mr. Whitehurst is absolutely correct in his claim that curriculum is key to successful education, good curriculum from school “A” may be a complete failure in school “B” due to differences in opinions and culture. I would worry that any attempt to guide curriculum development would ultimately hinder the process of improving education.