A mind for peace in Africa

Societies across the continent refine models of justice based on equality, inclusion, and reconciliation.

|
REUTERS
People displaced by fighting in Ethiopia find shelter in Abi Adi, Tigray Region, Ethiopia, June 24.

In recent years, Africa seems to have reverted to a tattered script of military coups, corruption, and civil wars. Yet that troubled surface masks a deeper ferment. From one society to another, Africans are charting pathways out of intractable conflict through the gradual, granular work of rebuilding trust through the practice of transitional justice.

“Transitional justice requires people coming together to address the legacies of cycles of violence, putting victims at the center and their dignity first,” notes Anna Myriam Roccatello, deputy executive director of the International Center for Transitional Justice.

Broadly put, transitional justice seeks to rebuild post-conflict societies through a restoration of the rule of law, reconciliation based on disclosure and forgiveness, and restitution for victims. The idea itself, of course, isn’t new. South Africa, Sierra Leone, and Rwanda launched healing models of truth-telling and forgiveness nearly three decades ago. The continent’s more recent examples, however, show how determined ordinary Africans are to create a more peaceful and inclusive future. In 2020, the African Union adopted a formal transitional justice framework for its member states. Last month, it launched a new three-year project with the European Union to support African states seeking to implement the idea.

“We have no other choice than to push and promote transitional justice,” stated Ambassador Bankole Adeoye, AU commissioner for political affairs, peace, and security. He placed a special emphasis on the role of women and youth in post-conflict healing.

Some countries have been at it for years. Gambia, in West Africa, launched a truth commission in 2017 to investigate human rights abuses during two decades of brutal dictatorship following a military coup in 1994. That panel was just a starting point. Earlier this month, legislators passed two bills – one establishing a reparations fund for victims, another banning individuals found to have committed atrocities from holding public office.

Other countries are just setting out. In Ethiopia, the federal government is locked in a debate with various ethnic groups over how to create a common narrative of past conflicts – including the two-year war it ended a year ago with rebellious Tigrayan militias. That dispute hasn’t stopped civil society groups from holding local reconciliation workshops across the country.

A comprehensive poll published in Foreign Affairs this month captured how Ethiopians seek to break cycles of violence reaching back decades. It showed a strong preference for local solutions. Of more than 6,000 people questioned, 41% favored seeking justice through local courts rather than through international tribunals, and 80% backed traditional forms of dialogue and reconciliation to address legacies of violence.

“Regardless of the Ethiopian government’s policy choices,” the survey’s authors wrote, “it will be critical to identify possible fault lines and anticipate unintended consequences so that transitional justice can be survivor-centered, credible, impartial, and effective. Accomplishing this will be no small challenge. But it can be done.”

Three decades of democratization has nourished the democracy aspirations of a younger generation of Africans. In like manner, the continent’s laboratories of transitional justice are deepening a mindset of peace based on justice and reconciliation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A mind for peace in Africa
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2023/1127/A-mind-for-peace-in-Africa
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe